Sign in to follow this  
Reagan

Global Warming Update!

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

Biggest scam going 

 

Quote:
Catherine McKenna's Climate Change Ministry is ignoring a century's worth of weather data that doesn't fit with the Liberals' pro-carbon tax, fear-mongering agenda, according to a new exclusive report by Blacklock's Reporter.

According to Blacklock's,

"Environment Canada omitted 100 years' worth of weather data from a federal website intended to illustrate climate change. Staff also used "modeling" instead of actual temperature readings to plot dramatic graphs, but said the result was not intended to be misleading.

"The historical data is not observed historical data," said Samantha Bayard, spokesperson for the department. "It is modeled historic data."

The temperature data is part of a new website by Climate Change Canada meant for policymakers to "support and enable Canada's climate change adaptation planning, and improve access to relevant climate data." It's meant to be the stuff taxes and climate emergency declarations are built on.

However, government cataloged temperature measurements collected between 1850-1949 were replaced by 24 models and historical simulations based on data collected from 1950-2005. The ministry claims the readings were excluded because the number of weather stations nationwide wasn't "dense" enough.

However, I think the truth is something much different. The 1850-1949 historical temperature readings are a bit of an inconvenient truth for the Liberals pro-carbon tax agenda.

Blacklock's reports that Vancouver was hotter in 1910 than it was in 2017. Toronto was warmer in 1852 than it was in 2017 and Moncton was warmer in 1906 than in 2017.

https://regulatorwatch.com/reported_elsewhere/100-years-of-climate-data-deleted-from-canadian-policy-report-including-historic-high-and-low/

Changed numbers, fake numbers, deleted data, how can anyone take this seriously?  And that’s not even taking into account all the other variables that affect the earths climate.  Good grief.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1

Now they are going after drive-thrus...,

 

Quote:
The ease of idling in a vehicle while waiting for your order is now associated with another development: climate change.

As a result, some communities across the U.S. are banning drive-thrus, citing the additional carbon emissions that are released. Minneapolis this summer banned construction of new drive-thrus, while officials in Long Beach, California, have imposed a six-month ban on new drive-thrus while they study the issue. Similar ordinances restricting or prohibiting fast-food windows have also been adopted in communities including Creve Coeur, Missouri; Fair Haven, New Jersey; and Orchard Park, New York.

At other times, such bans have been touted as a means of fighting obesity by discouraging fast-food consumption. There's conflicting research on whether banning drive-thru windows improves health.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cities-put-brakes-on-drive-thrus-to-curb-carbon-emissions/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PhatMack19 said:

Now they are going after drive-thrus...,

 

Quote:
The ease of idling in a vehicle while waiting for your order is now associated with another development: climate change.

As a result, some communities across the U.S. are banning drive-thrus, citing the additional carbon emissions that are released. Minneapolis this summer banned construction of new drive-thrus, while officials in Long Beach, California, have imposed a six-month ban on new drive-thrus while they study the issue. Similar ordinances restricting or prohibiting fast-food windows have also been adopted in communities including Creve Coeur, Missouri; Fair Haven, New Jersey; and Orchard Park, New York.

At other times, such bans have been touted as a means of fighting obesity by discouraging fast-food consumption. There's conflicting research on whether banning drive-thru windows improves health.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cities-put-brakes-on-drive-thrus-to-curb-carbon-emissions/

I guess we better ban heavy slow moving traffic.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    41,243
    Total Members
    1,432
    Most Online
    LCMERock
    Newest Member
    LCMERock
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...