Jump to content

Global Warming Update!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has suggested people should "poop every other day" as a way to save the planet.

This is the hidden content, please

I tell you what, I will give him my cardiologist and nephrologist's number and he can run his climate control plan by them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, baddog said:

Depending on what I eat and how much coffee I drink, I can go to twice in one day. Guess that would put me on the extermination list.

In Brazil, you’d get the death penalty. 

But on a serious note, if they made this a law in California, it’d cut the pooping in the streets in half.  😂😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

At least they are saving the environment I guess....

 

 

FREMONT (CBS SF) – A Tesla electric patrol car by the Fremont Police ran low on electricity in the middle of a pursuit, after the department said someone forgot to plug the vehicle into a charger.

According to officials, the officer was pursuing a vehicle headed down to the South Bay when the car began to run low on battery power.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Biggest scam going 

 

Quote:
Catherine McKenna's Climate Change Ministry is ignoring a century's worth of weather data that doesn't fit with the Liberals' pro-carbon tax, fear-mongering agenda, according to a new exclusive report by Blacklock's Reporter.

According to Blacklock's,

"Environment Canada omitted 100 years' worth of weather data from a federal website intended to illustrate climate change. Staff also used "modeling" instead of actual temperature readings to plot dramatic graphs, but said the result was 
This is the hidden content, please
.


"The historical data is not observed historical data," said Samantha Bayard, spokesperson for the department. "It is modeled historic data."

The temperature data is part of a new website by Climate Change Canada meant for policymakers to "support and enable Canada's climate change adaptation planning, and improve access to relevant climate data." It's meant to be the 
This is the hidden content, please
 are built on.

However, government cataloged temperature measurements collected between 1850-1949 were replaced by 24 models and historical simulations based on data collected from 1950-2005. The ministry claims the readings were excluded because the number of weather stations nationwide wasn't "dense" enough.

However, I think the truth is something much different. The 1850-1949 historical temperature readings are a bit of an inconvenient truth for the Liberals pro-carbon tax agenda.

Blacklock's reports that Vancouver was hotter in 1910 than it was in 2017. Toronto was warmer in 1852 than it was in 2017 and Moncton was warmer in 1906 than in 2017.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,924
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...