Search the Community

Both parties are to blame, the last administration started the stimulus money and act like they have no hand in what's going on now... materials and fuel increased in 2019 but they'll tell you otherwise... talk about clowns and sheep

I love his salad dressing and pretty good spaghetti sauce for store bought... No really. It's not that Maher didn't see it before. He, and they, always know what they're supposed to do. Now it's back to attacking democrats. Divide and conquer has to go both ways. A perpetual state of confusion to sour the views of all. I've noticed late night talk shows making fun of democrats since day 1. Wonder why that is... controversy sells. They gonna make ratings equal money no matter who's in charge.

OK, anybody but Trump. Everybody understands that. But when you would vote for anyone but Trump, no matter the candidate, why the old white guy? The anybody but Trump attitude makes the Democrats look even more stupid. Here is what that basically means. Trump is so bad that I would vote for a semi-intelligent octopus. Okay, awesome. The Democrats are always pushing any kind of minority, regardless of qualifications. Look at the current Press Secretary. She walks out to take the job for the first day and announces that she’s a quadruple minority. Everything since then appears to have been a disaster. Now they are having guest speakers such as a Korean boys group, a movie star to talk about gun control, etc. and then running her out the door. But OK, if that and what do you want go for it. So here is the scenario. Anybody we put up against Trump will probably win. We don’t have that semi intelligent octopus but we have a female pacific islander/Asian who is a Hindu. We have a male who is the mayor of a large city and he has a husband. We have black female counterpart to Bill Clinton. The list was long and varied. According to the Democrats, anybody could’ve beat in Trump. What a great chance to get someone in there other than a white male. ANYBODY but Trump WILL WIN!!! But who did the rank and file Dems choose when it could have been “anybody”? No, the anybody but Trump argument doesn’t make the Democrats look smart, he makes them look stupid. Not because they wanted someone else but because they could have put in anyone else and chose not to.

You can't be serious...... Have you been on twitter? They are trashing him, calling him anti LBGTQ because he signed the bill that won't allow transgender talk to 1st graders and below......

Okay, so my buddy, @TxHoopsfinally watched this highlight clip. I’m sure his mind is befuddled with all the scientific jargon. Don’t be embarrassed partner. They often talk way over my head. For instance, what’s significant about 1.6 gigahertz? Even Travis (Dr. Taylor, the NASA Aerospace Engineer) doesn’t know. Real interesting episode last night. Prior to the current owner, Brandon Fugal, the Ranch was bought in 1996 by Robert Bigelow, founder of NIDS (National Institute for Discovery Science). He kept it for 20 years. NIDS, in cahoots with the Fed Govt, spent 20 years investigating Skinwalker. NIDS first employee hired was retired Colonel Dr. John Alexander who oversaw most of the research there. He was on last nights episode. Travis and the current group were explaining all the weird things happening there, primarily when they start experiments, and wanted his input. Did Alexander & NIDS have that problem? He said, and I’m paraphrasing, “Your first mistake is thinking you’re in control of these things. You’re not. It’s in control”. And Alexander, like the current researchers, has no idea who or what it is. After the interview they started another experiment. Down what appeared to be a trail, they took a D8 dozer and scrapped about 6” of topsoil off over about 30 feet. Then when starting another cut going about a foot down, the dozer died. Instruments indicated the batteries were dead. Batteries were brand new. It had struck again. That night they shot a rocket, with instrumentation on board, up into the area above the Ranch that seems to be the center for activity. As rocket reached the spot the instruments were released, but the parachute failed to open. How it can seemingly mess with things that it is not connected to in anyway, is an unexplainable phenomenon. The astrologers computers hooked to their cameras went dark and they weren’t connected to the Internet. Stand alone, yet it managed to knock out not one but three of them. That can’t be explained. Not in our world. It is so far ahead of us it’s embarrassing.

The claimed party of inclusion needs to take a look in the mirror. This last presidential election saw the most diverse set of people ever run on the Democratic (or any) side. We had black female, openly gay male, Asian, openly of a different religion other than Christianity or Jewish and so on. The Democrats had literally almost any demographic to choose from and who do they come up with, an elderly white guy who’s almost 4 years older than Trump. For all the talk from the people that are liberal, not the politicians, showed that their actions don’t back up their rhetoric. They had a Samoan female Hindu who was a United States military member, a homosexual male who is the mayor of a major city, black female who was a federal prosecutor and a senator and on all down the line. Who did the rank and file Democrats choose…. the old white guy. Then they will lecture you about inclusion……

Here is yet another video that list some details about the shooting in Uvalde. It is a long podcast but the first part is devoted to the shooting. You have to get past his advertisement in preparatory talk and I think you can actually drag it to the 4 minute mark to start listening. It’s an editorial piece written by some Georgia law enforcement or something similar. He basically list a media claim and then debunks it with what they know or believe they know. The part about the shooting discussed in the editorial runs 7 minutes or to about the 11 minute mark so watch 4-11 minutes. I think it is about the 7 1/2 minute mark when the narrator talks about the stupidity of the commanding officers by making comments but they have no clue as to their accuracy. After the 11 minute mark he talks for another minute or two using a bit of profanity about the media will not retract what they have done even if proven (likely) that they were completely wrong.

dear fellow American, I make a point not to tit for tat(argue with anyone) about politics or religion. This is not an attempt to either. But think about this, folks posting on here are not wrong if they do or have taken the 'gun control " talk personally. Cause like I have already said before, I have not heard one politician say anything about how they intend to disarm criminals. So far, only law abiding citizens will be disarmed if their ideas are put into place. take care.

I have said it from the beginning on various forums, it is political. When the news media started asking very pointed questions that they did not have answers to, they should have simply shut up and said we don’t have the answer. But…. they wanted to look like they were in control It was an international news story. It took a long time for the officers to get in and instead of finding out what happened, competing Talking Heads from law-enforcement and the government such as the governor, started putting out what was essentially rumors. I said it in this forum, I don’t remember a situation where so many people who are commanders were tripping over each other in order to get to the front of the line to point at the other guy. Like the video I just posted said, they still need to get the facts And the officer steel might have made a terrible mistake. From what those two officers understand and have talk to some people inside, it does not appear to be nearly the critical mistakes that were claimed. The claimed information that the door could have been easily entered or that there were 19 cowardly police officers that huddled together in the hallway not knowing what to do, appears to be complete nonsense.

From the article, Musk says he might die under mysterious circumstances. Lmbo, talk about getting your name added to a long and distinguished list. The number of folks that have died under mysterious circumstances, after confronting/challenging the Dem Party exceeds the total population of some smaller countries. Hillary is ground zero for the suicide epidemic, many with the most amazing ideas of how to end one’s life - shooting themselves in the back of the head three times - jumping from a high-speed UFO - dying from massive intravenous overdoses of double stuffed Oreos. This story will make a great movie.

With all this "gun control" talk, I haven't heard one politician say how they plan to take guns from criminals, just law abiding citizens.

Yes, that is why I specifically stick with murders. Gun control arguments always talk about suicides but usually forget to mention it. ABOUT 25,000 PEOPLE A YEAR ARE KILLED BY GUNS!!!!! … and 9,000 of them are murders. And I am not negating the tragic nature of the 9000 or all of the suicides but with the gun control argument from the anti-gun people, it’s almost certainly disingenuous.

Dumb and Dumber - I need a sociologist to explain that one to me. I’ve to many (younger) friends talk about how good it was, and I like a good comedy. One guy loaned me the DVD & I sit down ready for some belly laughs. I suffered through a little over half way before I cut it off. Never laughed. Has to be a generational thing since so many liked it. Made me feel old & out of touch. Why didn’t I find it funny? Last good funny movie I saw, We’re the Millers. That one got Hagar’s belly shaking, lol.

Sadly, no one wants to talk about this, especially democrats.

talk about longevity! Calallen now has the winningest baseball and football coach.

Baytown Lee? Talk about ironies.

Could this have happened because they have effectively surrendered? Could it be they have finally realized that the banal and vapid old standards ( aka you are racist, sexist, homophobic, ) have lost efficacy and original thought is required to get back in the game? Or do they, perhaps, now understand that not everyone believes that the government is the solution to all problems?

In another thread in this forum they talk about the woman who stopped the possible mass murder by shooting a man with her pistol when he brought out an A.R. 15 and started firing rounds. At the time there were two parties going on in an apartment complex and a fairly large crowd. Gun opponents will surely say, that man was evidence that people should not have firearms or AR 15 or whatever. He apparently was angry because he was told to leave the complex and he wanted to take revenge. So here is the question for those people. If he did not have access to a firearm and he was angry and wanted to kill and injure a bunch of people with what he had available, could he have? It was a crowd of people with two parties going on outside. What if he had been going approximately 100 miles an hour and driven into the crowd? Would it make us feel better if there were 15 dead people and 20 injured but it’s OK because it was not a gun?

Perfect candidate doesn't exist, but I'd start by saying not cheat on his pregnant wife with porn stars etc and then get praised by the supposedly Christian side of the aisle pshh yeah right, or talk about #### hole countries or say he doesn't want blacks counting his money, yeah I know I know fake news... the list keeps going but that'll give you a hint I guess we could say that's the past repent and move on, same can be said for every accusation towards others.... got to be consistent

JoeBama Was Supposed to Meet Uvalde Residents, But Fled When They Booed and Chanted “Do Something!” Talk about being COWARD! [Hidden Content]

You keep missing exactly what I’m saying…but you’re agreeing partially without even realizing it. New gun laws aren’t the answer. Gun owners, dealers, and lobbyists need to take the lead in policing themselves or whatever you want to call it. That’s what I’ve been trying to say all along. Lock up your guns. Yes, your little is Johnny is no different than Ramos…. I don’t care if you have taught him all about firearm safety. Don’t sell your personal guns to anyone you don’t already trust with your life. Dealers and manufacturers need to be responsible. The problem is that whenever you try to talk common sense with a gun nut, all he can say is some regurgitated mess about the second amendment and those darned democrats. This weekend we’re remembering those brave service men/women that gave their lives protecting our freedom. We should also be remembering all of the kids who’ve died (and will continue to die) so we can keep sticking our head in the sand and pretending that this isn’t a gun issue. The liberals all argue that we don’t have a drug problem in America… we have an addiction/mental health problem. In fact, drugs should be readily available to anyone that wants them. You know, even open stores where you can buy them without an ID. And we all agree that those politicians are stupid and cause the issues that we have in major cities… homelessness, crime, etc. What happens if you mix up that narrative a little bit? The gun guys all argue that we don’t have a gun problem in America… we have an addiction/mental health problem. In fact, guns should be readily available to anyone that wants them. You know, even open stores where you can buy them without even registering them. It sounds trite, but guns ARE a huge part of the problem. Could this have happened with one man and a musket? One man with a sword? 21 people murdered with a pocketknife? The fact that it’s so easy for a whacko to get his hands on a weapon that is capable of doing this much damage should cause concern for even the most die-hard gun enthusiast.

Talk about going off the deep end! Wow If this is what you buy into I'm not even sure how to go bout this

For about 30 years when people talk about or laugh about people who might be caring a .32 or .22 for self-defense, it sure a beats pointing your finger and going Bang!!

A bartender breaks the law when he sells to intoxicated person. A licensed dealer such as this case, broke no law unless he knew the purchaser’s intent. Talk about a slippery slope. Sorry sir, you complied with all of the laws that we gave you but we’re going to have to charge you with a crime anyway. What crime? Well, you should have been a pre-cog and know that the guy intended to kill children at a school. If you can’t read a mind, you are a criminal.

Your TDS is showing again. The only one screaming is you. What’s more stupid and delusional is that you think you can legislate this from happening again. Talk about STUPID! Mentally Deranged Evil people do not follow laws. Stop pawning this off on law abiding gun owners. Move to the UK or Australia with Bobcat if it bothers you so much. Tighten entry points at schools and give teachers the freedom to carry. Make it known to the community that teachers are packing.