tvc184

Wrong!!
Location doesn’t matter. 
Take Mid and South County for example. In the last 5 years, PA has averaged 14.5 murders per 100,000 people. The 3 Mid-County cities with almost the same population as PA (56k-pa  v. 50k-mc) has 2.5 murders per 100,000 people. Adjusted for the slight population difference, it is 2.75.
So cities literally across the street from PA have  the same murder rate of about 3 per 100k people in MC to about 15 in PA. 
Oh wait…….

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
THREE, yes THREE murders on a Tuesday night.......in Beaumont.
Keep saying it happens everywhere.......it doesn't 

Well, we have you here to educate us! 🙄

I thought it would take about 3 days to move forward. It took 1.
😎

Yup......a few hours later and now they can't enforce.
 

Why is this on a political site?
Not surprised it's a Klein piece

This thread has obviously run its course. It was about passing an immigration law but has skewed off into attacks and comments that have nothing to do with the topic. 

You are probably correct… there are millions of Canadians pouring across the border in caravans but for some reason have gone unnoticed.
I hear that Detroit and Seattle now have a huge homeless population because of all the White Canadians streaming into this country.

If I was voting for a spiritual leader then none of them would get my vote.
From JFK’s well known flings to Clinton's Oval Office affair that he was compelled to address on national television, to one time front runner to be the president in Democrat Gary Hart and so on, the Republicans hardly have a monopoly on infidelity. Trump’s accusation as far as I know happened well before he became president however the two Democratic presidents that I mentioned happened in their term and in the White House.
I think I will look elsewhere for moral guidance other than the Democratic Party…. 🤣🤣🤣

You are probably correct… there are millions of Canadians pouring across the border in caravans but for some reason have gone unnoticed.
I hear that Detroit and Seattle now have a huge homeless population because of all the White Canadians streaming into this country.

If I was voting for a spiritual leader then none of them would get my vote.
From JFK’s well known flings to Clinton's Oval Office affair that he was compelled to address on national television, to one time front runner to be the president in Democrat Gary Hart and so on, the Republicans hardly have a monopoly on infidelity. Trump’s accusation as far as I know happened well before he became president however the two Democratic presidents that I mentioned happened in their term and in the White House.
I think I will look elsewhere for moral guidance other than the Democratic Party…. 🤣🤣🤣

WRONG!!
They are of an excellent design, I am sure paid for at a high engineering and consulting cost.
 These signs scream of success!!
Seriously, if you are going to waste money on such an endeavor, that is the best they could come up with?
On the order hand, maybe one of the big oil companies donated the money and it really has no bearing on the taxpayers.
 On the other hand is it any different than the money wasted on the Welkom To Nederland sign? 

Maybe they would prefer unlawfuls. 

I'm not sure if you have kids (Honestly I hope not with your response), but I do and I thank God he is still with me. I have two good friends, one lost her first born Son(to a work accident) and the other to a drug overdose. The pain that causes does not go away....EVER.  That pain is so severe, if you have kids or don't, you can't even attempt to understand their pain. They are reminded several times a year (every holiday, birthday and special event) for the rest of their life they lost their kid.  So, if that guy Republican or Democrat got in to yell at the President over the death of his Son, I support that 150%.....and you should too. Life is short, and you never know if your kid might lose their life and you have that same pain. 
Everything is not politics, and those lives and deaths are real.

So where did Phelan’s $9 million come from, local donors?
I can only find Covey with almost $1 million but I am still looking. I am assuming they some of these pages aren’t updated. 
 You define radicals as anyone that you don’t agree with. I guess school choice is radical.
It is certainly okay if you don’t like conservative politics but that doesn’t make them radicals. It only means that you lean left and don’t agree. 

The sign might not be impressive but I bet it sure makes you want to come to Port Arthur now, right?
 Like:
Geez, what have I been missing!!? 

Sounds like the Band parents are a bunch of helicopter moms.
You get to watch them march at halve time.

Is the failure (as noted by BS Wildcats) the person who has the constitutional right to complain or the legal body that issues a ruling that clearly is unconstitutional?

In this case we have a 91 year old former Republican lawmaker who was butt hurt over January 6 and made the sole determination that it was unconstitutional for Trump to be on the ballot. Like you, she was likely blinded by her anyone but Trump hatred but that is a protected right.
This supposedly famed Colorado (first woman state leader) Republican in the article that you posted said that the Founding Fathers contemplated a candidate like Trump. She knew he was ineligible to run again. (quoted from the article)  “She knew!!!”
The Founding Fathers?? 
This doddering old fool has apparently lost enough of her marbles that she forgot that the Fourteenth Amendment came out after the Civil War as a response to civil rights for Blacks almost 100 years after independence was declared and the Founding Fathers have long since left the Earth. With this brilliant insight into the Constitution and history, she solely made the determination that Trump was ineligible. Utterly brilliant!!
Of course she still has enough beans rattling around in her brain to know that her absolute knowledge of the Constitution had to be upheld by the Colorado Supreme Court.
So who is the on the Colorado Supreme Court and how are they selected? 
A Colorado Supreme Court justice is selected by the governor of Colorado. So the only way to be appointed as a Colorado Supreme Court justice, the sitting governor has to make the appointment. They each later face a 10 year term for reelection by the public in a general election. 
All current Colorado Supreme Court justices were appointed by Democrats. Some? A majority perhaps? Nope, the entire Colorado Supreme Court was appointed by a Democrat governor. 
So again, who owns the failure? A person who complains like this old biddy that deemed herself as a constitutional scholar and out to (again from the article) save the Democracy or the duly constituted body who by law is supposed to make decision based on the US Constitution?
Sorry but this falls squarely on the constitutional body who was selected by the Democratic governors. A body who a unanimous US Supreme Court slapped down because they collectively couldn’t understand this section from the Fourteenth Amendment:
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Again, it doesn’t say a state legislature, a state Supreme Court, a state attorney general, an old woman who thinks that the Founding Fathers were still around after the Civil War or anyone else other than Congress.
BS Wildcats was 100% correct. It wasn’t an old Republican lawmaker who has the First Amendment constitutional right to free speech and also the First Amendment right to redress the government for grievances. It was the 100% Democratic Supreme Court of Colorado who could not understand a single sentence and in particular a single word, “Congress”. 

Wow, TVC, it appears you haven't lost your edge after all. 🙂
 

Is the failure (as noted by BS Wildcats) the person who has the constitutional right to complain or the legal body that issues a ruling that clearly is unconstitutional?

In this case we have a 91 year old former Republican lawmaker who was butt hurt over January 6 and made the sole determination that it was unconstitutional for Trump to be on the ballot. Like you, she was likely blinded by her anyone but Trump hatred but that is a protected right.
This supposedly famed Colorado (first woman state leader) Republican in the article that you posted said that the Founding Fathers contemplated a candidate like Trump. She knew he was ineligible to run again. (quoted from the article)  “She knew!!!”
The Founding Fathers?? 
This doddering old fool has apparently lost enough of her marbles that she forgot that the Fourteenth Amendment came out after the Civil War as a response to civil rights for Blacks almost 100 years after independence was declared and the Founding Fathers have long since left the Earth. With this brilliant insight into the Constitution and history, she solely made the determination that Trump was ineligible. Utterly brilliant!!
Of course she still has enough beans rattling around in her brain to know that her absolute knowledge of the Constitution had to be upheld by the Colorado Supreme Court.
So who is the on the Colorado Supreme Court and how are they selected? 
A Colorado Supreme Court justice is selected by the governor of Colorado. So the only way to be appointed as a Colorado Supreme Court justice, the sitting governor has to make the appointment. They each later face a 10 year term for reelection by the public in a general election. 
All current Colorado Supreme Court justices were appointed by Democrats. Some? A majority perhaps? Nope, the entire Colorado Supreme Court was appointed by a Democrat governor. 
So again, who owns the failure? A person who complains like this old biddy that deemed herself as a constitutional scholar and out to (again from the article) save the Democracy or the duly constituted body who by law is supposed to make decision based on the US Constitution?
Sorry but this falls squarely on the constitutional body who was selected by the Democratic governors. A body who a unanimous US Supreme Court slapped down because they collectively couldn’t understand this section from the Fourteenth Amendment:
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Again, it doesn’t say a state legislature, a state Supreme Court, a state attorney general, an old woman who thinks that the Founding Fathers were still around after the Civil War or anyone else other than Congress.
BS Wildcats was 100% correct. It wasn’t an old Republican lawmaker who has the First Amendment constitutional right to free speech and also the First Amendment right to redress the government for grievances. It was the 100% Democratic Supreme Court of Colorado who could not understand a single sentence and in particular a single word, “Congress”. 

There was one article that I saw on another forum that said, Ketanji Brown Jackson sides with Trump.
No, she sided with the Constitution.
If anyone wants some entertainment, look at some of the news articles or videos of the left coming unhinged that the Supreme Court didn’t rule against the Constitution and then did so in unanimous fashion. 

That is what I was referring to with Gabbard.
It should not be a person that anyone thinks can truly be the next president if needed but the person who can win the election.
It doesn’t always work that way as the candidates or their handlers don’t always seem to be the politically most intelligent. I think it’s because most of them do not live inside the real world.
Like Ramaswamy, Lake would be a Trump clone except a female. I am not against that, but what was she bring to the table other than her sex? Nothing except a long shot at winning AZ.


 

The sign might not be impressive but I bet it sure makes you want to come to Port Arthur now, right?
 Like:
Geez, what have I been missing!!? 

I could see Boebert coming in handy.  
 
Sorry.  Sometimes I can’t help myself. 

This was the only result that was ever going to happen  Insane that the states tried to do this.