Realville

At this point in time all we have is spineless Republicans and Power hungry Democrats. The rest of the world is laughing at us and shaking their head.

😂🤣
 

I'll agree with abortion under those limited reasons (rape, incest, life of the mother) if you'll agree that any other reasons should be illegal.  
 
Abortion Fans use those reasons to get a "foot in the door." They throw out the listed reasons while they actually believe that there should be no restrictions whatsoever.
 
I personally feel that abortion is immoral, at least for me, anyways... but I really didn't have an opinion on legality.  My opposition came when the D's made "abortion is a right regardless of a woman's ability to pay" a part of their platform.  If I have no business in women's reproductive issues, then you don't need my tax dollars to fund them, either.  
 

I'll answer that one.  Yes on both counts...no other reasons can be used.
Both are very rare and the latter is almost never, although the pro-abortion crowd will tell you different.
Now, do you think these conditions would make the pro-abortion crowd happy?
Absolutely not, their main concern has never been about the health of the mother and certainly isn't about the baby they want to kill.
 

Well I’ll agree with you on not trusting the Democrats and most Republicans.

They’re protecting him so much that they want even release their own use of force guidelines. I promise you if it were a white US Capitol Police Officer shooting an unarmed black BLM protester....Washington DC would be burned to the ground and all names would be released.

I said a prayer for you. Literally. 

Great comparison. Unborn children are as evil as convicted murders. Got it!

He's just stirring the pot...anyone with any sense at all knows that wasn't an attempt to overthrow the government.
Then again, TDS can be very powerful.

Not to me either. It sure looks like they are hiding something. 

The problem is that there is no inherent right to information. It has to be written into the law. The federal government and each state has its own laws on freedom of information. They are definitely not the same. In Texas there are things that must be released upon request, things that may be released upon request but not mandatory and things that cannot be released.
i’ll give you an example on Texas law. Under Texas civil service law The only thing that the state recognizes as punishment for police officers is a suspension. Punishment (suspension) is part of a public record. All of the corrective actions are sealed and private. Even when a police officer is terminated it is called an indefinite suspension. So if an officer gets a letter in his file of a reprimand, it is not public. If he has his duty assignment changed or the shift that he works changed because of a discipline issue, it is not public and is protected information. If it rises to the level of a suspension, then it becomes public. That is an example where the law says you cannot release information but under certain conditions you must release the information.
Another example under Texas law is the making of a police call for service. If a person calls the police, if the police make a traffic stop or any other type of official police contact, it is public record. How far that public record goes is the issue however. The fact that a person called the police is public including the person’s  name (if known) and the address the police went to and the general complaint. An example would be a person calling the police to report his home had been broken into over the weekend.  What the police did there if they made a police report can be protected however. If the police made a report or investigation, the public part would be the location, the accused crime or incident and the victim’s  name. The details of the report however can be protected. That is why the news media in many cases cannot give details of a crime being reported by them because the police do not have to release the information and in most cases will not. Releasing such information tends to hamper the investigation and by law can kill a confession or the information used at a criminal trial. So while it is not illegal to release the information to the public, it could make the investigation very difficult particularly in the area of confessions.
Those are just examples of how the law differs according to where you were at. Apparently the federal law covering Washington DC has not yet required the police release that information. I am sure that media sources have filed legal issues in reference to this to see if the government is complying with the law. I know in my Police Department (and probably all) we get freedom of information requests all the time and turn it over to the legal department to see if The information can be released.or if we have the option of privacy.
I don’t see how policy is protected but without knowing the law in Washington DC, I simply do not know. 

The National Enquirer of TV. 😂🤣

For the last several legislative sessions (once every two years) at least one member of the Texas legislature has submitted a bill commonly called “constitutional carry” or basically carrying a handgun without any kind of license required.
It normally does not get much traction however it has pushed Texas from the no handgun allowed to open carry with a license.
Going back in history, basically since the Civil War Texas has not allowed the carrying of handguns in public. In the early 1990s the Texas legislature passed a concealed handgun license bill however Ann Richards vetoed it. That was significant. The significance of it was that she was defeated in the next election because of that and it ushered in the era of George W. Bush. That in turn propelled him to the presidency. Thanks Ann!!
But back on topic…
I believe in 1995 the legislature again passed a concealed handgun license and this time George Bush, as promised, signed the law. Texas for the first time since The Civil War allowed civilians to carry handguns in public. That original law required about a 16 hour class and a $240 license which like a drivers license had to be renewed every few years. The handgun had to be concealed and there were other limitations on locations such as not in hospitals, large amusement parks, racetrack, etc. For the most part however, a person wishing to take the class and pay the fees, could carry a handgun for protection. 
Over the years they have slowly eased up on the requirements and fees. Then they passed the license to carry which now allowed open carry a handgun as well as concealed. They have eventually reduced the licensing fee to I believe $40 now and reduce the class from two days to only four hours.
Basically if you had four hours and a very few dollars, you could openly or concealed carry a handgun in Texas.
The Texas legislature is back in session which began in the first week of January and ends in about 10 days. Like normal for the last few sessions, a bill was submitted to carry a handgun without a license or constitutional carry. It is just my opinion but I believe this year was different because of the national Democrats making such a move to get rid of gun rights. I believe that spurred some legislators to move forward where in past sessions they have not. The Constitutional carry bill (HB1927) went through the House of Representatives fairly easily (with no Dem support) and was then sent to the Senate. There it met some opposition even from the Republicans. It wasn’t so much opposition as it was wanting to tweak the bill by adding amendments. The Texas Senate then passed the bill however they added several amendments to it.
I’m sure everyone knows the procedure but when the two houses pass similar bills, it cannot become law. Both houses must pass a Word for Word same bill for it to go to the governor. What happens if they are not exactly the same? It then goes to a committee and has conferees from both houses to see if they can work out a compromise that both will support. So the Senate Bill with its amendments went back to the House and they rejected Senate version of the bill. Eight days ago it was sent to the conferees to try to work out a compromise however the session is going to end in a few days.
Well, late yesterday afternoon they reached an agreement that they believe they can get through both houses. I have not seen the final version yet because they have not posted it but I am assuming that some of the Senate amendments will remain (and having read them, I think that is a good thing). 
HB1927 is scheduled to be brought to a vote next week in both houses and I believe there’s about a 98% chance of it passing. The bill can still be killed but I think this is the year it will finally pass. The governor has already said that if the bill passes, he will sign it.
Meaning??
Probably on September 1 of this year, people in Texas who are at least 21 years of age and have not been convicted of a felony or domestic violence or are ian illegal alien, can carry a concealed handgun or openly carry one as long as it is in a holster and can do so with no license, permit or school required.

Thank you sir for your service. 
The only bad thing about retirement is you can’t take a day off......because your already retired. Enjoy retirement.

😂🤣
 

😂🤣
 

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up

Well here it is again.

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up

Is that like a drug addict getting his “fix”?  😂🤣😂

How funny 👏👏👏. Typical liberal meltdown caught on camera. 😂 
I believe Bongino will be taking over Rush Limbaugh’s radio time slot starting next Monday. Big shoes to fill but I think Bongino is the right guy for the times were living in to fill that spot.

If we are being honest, you answer less than 25% of the questions I ask you. But of course there are black men qualified to be a head coach.

The same year my annual pay was cut by 75% due to fear mongering lying greedy power hungry politicians.