Jump to content

SETXsports Archived Threads

Every year, SETXsports cleans out their forums. You can find all old threads and posts here. This is a read only forum


76,489 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 8 replies
    • 4k views
    • 19 replies
    • 12.5k views
    • 3 replies
    • 4.6k views
    • 4 replies
    • 5.4k views
    • 12 replies
    • 9.5k views
    • 13 replies
    • 19.4k views
    • 2 replies
    • 11.8k views
    • 2 replies
    • 10.8k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2.2k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.9k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2.5k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2.8k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2.4k views
    • 1 reply
    • 3k views
    • 1 reply
    • 3.1k views
    • 3 replies
    • 3.6k views
    • 2 replies
    • 3.2k views
    • 2 replies
    • 3k views
    • 16 replies
    • 30.1k views
    • 15 replies
    • 7k views
    • 22 replies
    • 4k views
    • 16 replies
    • 3.6k views
    • 0 replies
    • 992 views
    • 4 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 581 views
    • 0 replies
    • 565 views
    • 1 reply
    • 794 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
    • 1 reply
    • 727 views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 643 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 1 reply
    • 609 views
    • 2 replies
    • 629 views
    • 2 replies
    • 671 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.3k views
    • 12 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 27 replies
    • 5.5k views
    • 1 reply
    • 755 views
    • 1 reply
    • 709 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 4 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 1 reply
    • 809 views
    • 1 reply
    • 630 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 2 replies
    • 550 views
    • 1 reply
    • 730 views
    • 10 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 1 reply
    • 837 views
    • 1 reply
    • 737 views
    • 17 replies
    • 2.5k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1k views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 2 replies
    • 980 views
    • 1 reply
    • 835 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.2k views


  • Live & Upcoming Broadcasts

  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
×
×
  • Create New...