All Activity

What are you asking me for? The Supreme Court said that the President can’t override the Constitution at his whim. Whether or not a tariff based Federal economic system is wise will be proved out by time, not courts.

When someone calls out daddy’s money, that’s pure envy because they don’t have that life. I wish my daddy had passed me a million, the naysayers could take a hike, lol.

He acted like a petulant child. The same way he enacted some of the tariffs in the first place. This needs to stop. You can't continue to have a global trade policy change at the whims of a single person. That would mean trade policy could change every 2-3 years at election time. That's no way to run a business, and the U.S. is basically a very big business. SCOTUS stuck with their majority textualist's interpretation. I appreciate their consistency.

Now this is frickin hilarious!!

[Hidden Content]

He only gets his news from TrumpBad.com! (Grin)

Houston ISD has a Hudl account and will be streaming both tiebreaker games tonight. Furr vs. Wheatley at 5:30pm Winner vs. Worthing at 8pm.

They are use to Presidents that do one thing at a time...... Trump knows how to delegate.....He is a master at it. That is why he became wealthy...... Going off a little here, when folks say he used his daddies money to get rich.....The only truth to that is he did inherited a little money.....But if turning a million dollars into several billion were easy, we would have no millionaires, they would all be billionaires.....

From X: Dr. Steve Turley: Yep, this is exactly what we talked about on our livestream today. He can keep all tariffs using Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act and Section 122 of the Trade Act. Tariffs are here to stay. Quote @WallStreetMav LOL! SCOTUS’s ruling basically said Trump was using the wrong law for his tariffs, so Trump just issued the same tariffs under different laws and increased them by 10%. “Thank you for your attention to this matter.” - Trump Trump just keeps winning!

22-3A D2 #2 seed Play in Tonight, 6pm Woodville HS Winner of this game will play Central Heights in Bi-District

@UT alum

Don’t be lazy, look into it yourself.

I’m more concerned with folks that are distracted by the Epstein files and disregard the safe border and lower crime. There are some of us that can pay attention to more than one thing at a time.

I'm not hearing anything. Just curious if anyone has heard any news. I usually like to ask on the forum and in PM"s.

I don’t have a problem with tariffs…: I have a problem with Trump’s haphazard, punitive, ill-advised, with not strategy version of tariffs. “That lady was rude on a phone call… 20% tariff on them! Stuff like that. Announce a tariff, then repeal it. American businesses can’t plan because his polices change every day. It’s no way to run a country. The crazy part is IF the money is refunded, it’ll work like this. The tariffs were collected. The costs were passed on to the American consumer in the form of higher costs. If the money is eventually returned (and I don’t see that happening) those funds will just be sent back to the other countries. In effect, Trump’s tariffs would have simply taken hundreds of billions of EXTRA dollars from American consumers who purchased for made goods and sent them to other countries. It’s the ultimate self-own. It’s all so dumb.

Off topic briefly, not sure why this made me think of Oct 9 1982. That when my older brother and his Kirbyville team mates lost to Kountze 3-0. Kountze was on nation's longest highscool football losing streak (53 games). Of course making headlines across the country. My at least every other season reminder is due.

Not really confused. Just curious myself as to what you’re hearing. Not a lot of emoji options

Head in the sand syndrome!

@CS. Curious: Why would this confuse you?

Hypocrites….. Google search: President Biden maintained most of the trade tariffs on Chinese goods initiated during the Trump administration, even increasing duties on items like electric vehicles and semiconductors . Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi previously advocated for using tariffs to counter China's market influence, despite criticizing specific, broader tariff implementations. Representative Nancy Pelosi | (.gov) +3 Key Details on Tariff Policies Biden Administration: President Biden left many of the 2018-2019 China tariffs in place to protect U.S. industries and address unfair trade practices. His administration further increased duties on, among other things, solar cells, aluminum, steel, and, most notably, quadrupled tariffs on electric vehicles. Nancy Pelosi: While Pelosi criticized the Trump administration's "chaotic" approach to tariffs as a "self-inflicted disaster" that harmed consumers, she previously supported targeted, "smart" tariffs to address unfair trade practices, particularly regarding China. Contextual Shift: Critics and observers noted that some Democrats, including Pelosi, historically advocated for reciprocal trade measures against China, which mirrors the protectionist rhetoric later heavily utilized by the Trump administration. Facebook +6 While Biden and Pelosi often criticized the methods of the previous administration's trade policy, they did not remove the majority of the protective trade barriers

All you Trump haters…..Trump is a very sharp individual. Always know he has a plan “B”.

Two typical liberal comments. As long as it doesn’t affect me……..

Bingo!

There's a difference in being the head coach and being an assistant. I'm glad you brought this up. I was planning to do a little research on this very subject.