Jump to content

Ask MrUmp1 your rules question.


Recommended Posts

from the case book.

 

6.2.4 SITUATION A: With R1 on third and R2 on first, F1 stretches and comes

set. He then swings his entire nonpivot foot behind the back edge of the pitcher’s

plate, steps toward second and (a) throws the ball to second in an attempt to

retire R2, who is advancing there or (b) feints throw to second to drive R2 back

to first, who has neither attempted nor feinted an advance to second. RULING: In

(a), this is legal. In (b), it is a balk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I usually see in this is a pitcher not directly throw to second if a runner breaks early. Almost everytime he runs at the runner or looks at him then throws. If he does not throw to second in one continuous motion it is a balk. He can not spin and run without disengaging from rubber then throw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I usually see in this is a pitcher not directly throw to second if a runner breaks early. Almost everytime he runs at the runner or looks at him then throws. If he does not throw to second in one continuous motion it is a balk. He can not spin and run without disengaging from rubber then throw. 

this says otherwise. as long as he steps toward second he can feint he does not have to throw. now he is off the rubber and can do what he wants. only base you can not feint to is first.

 

 failing to step with the non-pivot foot directly toward a base (occupied or

unoccupied) when throwing or feinting there in an attempt to put out, or

drive back a runner; or throwing or feinting to any unoccupied base when

it is not an attempt to put out or drive back a runner;

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This can not be settled without a physical demo. There is a legal play to go to an unoccupied base. Umpires judgement on runner actually attempting to steal AND pitchers movement, will decide it. Just because you have never seen it, doesn't make it illegal. I threw that in referencing a reasoning from an umpire on why he called a balk on one of my pitchers. Can't protest bad judgement calls!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I wasn't talking about feinting, I am saying you can not swing around and run after the runner who broke early without disengaging from the rubber first. 

Yes you can. If you're talking about a runner leaving 2nd base headed to 3rd early and a pitcher does an "inside" move, he does not have to throw. And if you don't have to throw, what else is there to do besides take off running and forcing a run down? Once your lead leg crosses over to the backside of the rubber and touching the dirt, you are considered disengaged...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A batter is to be ready to enter the box. If he delays by not getting in the box or walks off after a pitch, a strike can be called. Part of the speed up rules is to keep the batters near the box. Another situation is if a batter ask for time but it is not granted and he walks out of the box, if the pitch is delivered it is a strike no matter if it is in the strike zone or not. I always try to keep the batters near the box, on  very few occasions over the past years have I called a strike on the batter. This has been a rule since the 1990's . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • KF89 unpinned and pinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • There's some truth to that.......some.
    • The AD's job is to win in football. Everything else is window dressing. If the football team is winning the rest can go up in smoke. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...