Jump to content

West Hardin


StangBacker

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, oldschool2 said:

I don't have a dog in this fight.. but.. it kind of does matter.  Which rule is being broken?.. and what coach, player, referee, or other member was called a name?  The only reason I bring it up is that I post some things every once in a while that people probably don't like but I still don't break the forum rules.  Like if I said some school was a blazing dumpster fire.. probably offensive but not against the rules. 

This isn't against the rules either.

18 ) The bashing of any particular coach, player, referee, etc will not be tolerated. This includes issues involving their personal lives, coaching/playing style or performance, past experiences, etc.

that extends to peoples towns as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bigdog said:

18 ) The bashing of any particular coach, player, referee, etc will not be tolerated. This includes issues involving their personal lives, coaching/playing style or performance, past experiences, etc.

that extends to peoples towns as well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, bigdog said:

18 ) The bashing of any particular coach, player, referee, etc will not be tolerated. This includes issues involving their personal lives, coaching/playing style or performance, past experiences, etc.

that extends to peoples towns as well.

Thanks for clearing it up.  That ETC is a little subjective, though.  Might be better clarified to specifically say "coach, referee, or any person(s) tied to any particular school/town."

I got you though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, bigdog said:

18 ) The bashing of any particular coach, player, referee, etc will not be tolerated. This includes issues involving their personal lives, coaching/playing style or performance, past experiences, etc.

that extends to peoples towns as well.

Ok.... If I can't criticize a team, coach, ref, player, play, penalty, past experiences, towns, etc.... What about the weather?  Is it okay to bash the weather?

 

What is this site for?  Just to rah-rah my own team?  I can admit that I occasionally cross "the line," but sometimes you guys are a little too touchy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Ok.... If I can't criticize a team, coach, ref, player, play, penalty, past experiences, towns, etc.... What about the weather?  Is it okay to bash the weather?

 

What is this site for?  Just to rah-rah my own team?  I can admit that I occasionally cross "the line," but sometimes you guys are a little too touchy.  

And if someone said that about your town in a generalization how would you feel about it?  Some people think they can get on here and say whatever they want, that is not the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, bigdog said:

And if someone said that about your town in a generalization how would you feel about it?  Some people think they can get on here and say whatever they want, that is not the case.

Of course it happens... I'm not mad.  I die laughing when the Newton people come back with their "living in a van down by Bailey's Fish Camp" blasts.  

I miss the days when upon hearing an insult, we'd fire back with one of our own.  Now-a-days we just get all indignant and complain about "bullying" or "privilege" or whatever else excuse that losers can come up with.  There's a big difference between some good ol' fashion "jawing" and outright abuse.  Nothing in this thread has come close to that in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck, what do y’all expect. Cardinal doesn’t even back his own home team !!! He talks a lot of crap about bc and every other town. I think now that his son has graduated already, he needs to get off this site. Dude , Cardinal backer, enough already. Your son was on that bc team that went 3 deep and you think you’re all bad and sh**!  But you’re just a trash talker that is immature for his age 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/6/2019 at 5:06 PM, bigdog said:

18 ) The bashing of any particular coach, player, referee, etc will not be tolerated. This includes issues involving their personal lives, coaching/playing style or performance, past experiences, etc.

that extends to peoples towns as well.

That’s a stretch , but I will conform west Hardin is a great place and the reason why people hate on West Hardin is becuase of systemic racism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, urban_meyer said:

Heck, what do y’all expect. Cardinal doesn’t even back his own home team !!! He talks a lot of crap about bc and every other town. I think now that his son has graduated already, he needs to get off this site. Dude , Cardinal backer, enough already. Your son was on that bc team that went 3 deep and you think you’re all bad and sh**!  But you’re just a trash talker that is immature for his age 

That’s what I’m talking about! 

Whats up with the Urban Meyer handle? It’s 2019, bruh... you can’t be supporting a coach that hires and protects woman fighters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, scat_trap said:

I was hoping Danny Villanueva would get a shot at this one.  Oh well, maybe it's a good thing Big V didn't get it.  Congrats to Coach Taylor!

This guys name tends to pop up for every small school job there is. Weren't you the guy who thought he should get the Livingston job when he was the baseball coach at HD?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 2wedge said:

This guys name tends to pop up for every small school job there is. Weren't you the guy who thought he should get the Livingston job when he was the baseball coach at HD?

I can't remember that far back but I can assure you I'm not Danny.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About the School Board interference, I hope you guys don’t think that’s unique to West Hardin, or just small schools.  It may pull more weight in a small school, but that poo goes on all over.  Lucky are the schools who don’t have this problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2019 at 10:02 PM, Uncle Pig said:

Didn’t GCM give up like 400 points last year? I’m not knocking the guy at all, and wish him the best, but that’s a lotta points 

It's not about x's and o's. Its about Larry's and Joe's.

GCM was short on the Larry's and Joe's when they gave up lots of points to New Caney, Kingwood Park and Porter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Bandwagon Ranger said:

It's not about x's and o's. Its about Larry's and Joe's.

GCM was short on the Larry's and Joe's when they gave up lots of points to New Caney, Kingwood Park and Porter.

Debatable..  But we are always shorter on Larrys and Joes 80% of the time.. Schemes can help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...