Jump to content

Can't help but wonder


stevenash

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, stevenash said:

Regarding the Mueller report, I wonder when Mr. Mueller knew there was no collusion?   Did he conclude it a few days ago, a few months ago, a year ago?  Did he know it before the mid term elections?   Hmmmm

I heard that Mueller knew a year and a half ago that there was not any collusion.  So, the question is -- why did he prolong it?  For more money?  To see if he could turn somebody?   I would investigate that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VeryStableEnlightenedOne said:

Lmao Bless their hearts they truly are low IQ voters 

I'm sure you've heard that saying a whole lot in your lifetime. It's not surprising you would use it inappropriately though. I'm guessing an extreme case of TDS can bring this on, or is it just natural for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Coach Frey said:

Mueller is/was a Republican.......

Let me throw out a fictitious scenario.  Lindsey Graham is the Independent Council to investigate Trump..  He’s going to have 16 lawyers helping.  How many do you think would be registered Republican voters?

Mueller may have been a Republican, but I can’t believe he still is.  He had 16 lawyers helping him and none were registered Republicans.  To give the appearance of impartiality, I can’t believe he didn’t have a few.  

This is the hidden content, please

Edited by Hagar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Do you find it odd that every attorney that he hired was a Clinton donor?  Is that the height of objectivity?

You would think that with all the anti Trump people working on this investigation, they would have, in the very least, fabricated something criminal. Instead, they come up with nothing and the dims won’t believe it. Enlightened one with the far superior I.Q., cn you explain that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/22/2019 at 8:56 AM, stevenash said:

Coach Frey, - is it your opinion that a true Republican  would assemble a staff of attorneys for the investigation that did not include a Republican?

My opinion is that an individual in the position of Mueller would not look at political leanings to make hiring decisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Coach Frey said:

My opinion is that an individual in the position of Mueller would not look at political leanings to make hiring decisions. 

If a jury is made up of twelve White guys judging the guilt/innocence of a Black defendant, you find no problem with that? If so, I'm with you. Don't let stereotypes or past history of the "judges" or prosecutors influence their abilities to do their jobs. Judge each person by their abilities, not the color of their skin...or their ideological leanings. Kudos Coach Frey, we agree that diversity is a non-issue and that a homogeneous group does have the ability to conclude unbiased judgements. Agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2019 at 8:10 PM, Englebert said:

If a jury is made up of twelve White guys judging the guilt/innocence of a Black defendant, you find no problem with that? If so, I'm with you. Don't let stereotypes or past history of the "judges" or prosecutors influence their abilities to do their jobs. Judge each person by their abilities, not the color of their skin...or their ideological leanings. Kudos Coach Frey, we agree that diversity is a non-issue and that a homogeneous group does have the ability to conclude unbiased judgements. Agree?

No, I don't believe in stereotyping. I'm the type of person I'm going to base my judgment of you on what you say and what your follow through is. I don't care what you look like or whether you are dem, republican, libertarian, or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Coach Frey said:

No, I don't believe in stereotyping. I'm the type of person I'm going to base my judgment of you on what you say and what your follow through is. I don't care what you look like or whether you are dem, republican, libertarian, or whatever.

So you agree that a homogeneous group can be fair and unbiased when judging someone that "doesn't look like them". The person being judged should have no worries that the group of "judges" will be fair despite their differences/attitude towards the person being judged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Trump has donated to both sides over the years.

You’re avoiding the question...are you saying there was no bias in Mueller’s selections?

I didn't avoid any question. Read above. I answered clearly. No I don't believe Mueller used political leanings as a bias in selection.

You on the other hand seem to be completely okay with an individual who plays both sides. I can't for the life of me see how an individual who claims to be a Republican, a conservative, pro life, pro second amendment, etc. could donate to Clinton, no matter the reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Englebert said:

So you agree that a homogeneous group can be fair and unbiased when judging someone that "doesn't look like them". The person being judged should have no worries that the group of "judges" will be fair despite their differences/attitude towards the person being judged.

I was pretty clear on my view of this. 

I can see you are trying to weave a web here, but I'm not exactly sure what your angle is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,909
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   Glad to see some of this happening.  I'm sick of the anti-american  and anti-Israel nonsense that's been allowed at some of the most prestigious colleges our country has to offer.  In this case Columbia has had 108 student protestors arrested and trespassed, suspending them from class and housing.  This younger generation thinks they can do whatever they want.  I'm glad the tides are starting to turn and these kids are starting to get a lesson in what happens when you act like entitled idiots.   I know that I'm not as conservative as some of you guys on here, but for the life of me I can't figure out why there are so many thousands of anti-american foreigners up in the northeast.  For me, the very first time you get caught participating in one of these protests, especially if you're burning flags, holding a sign criticizing america, etc., you're deported if you don't have citizenship.  If you have a visa, it's revoked.  If you weren't born here, you're sent to where you were born and not allowed back.  I have no issue with diversity, but why on earth do we allow people to come here who hate us?  Send them back.
    • Just my guess on how things will play out. Hard to predict this district you never know what team will show up.
    • I guess you can't answer the question. Smh
    • Answer my question. You were bragging about all of the states that support Texas. How are they sognificant? Can't be for political purposes. Soldier may submit a 1-A-0 conscientious objector application when the Soldier is sincerely opposed because of religious or deeply held moral or ethical (not political, philosophical or sociological) beliefs to participating as a combatant (including training in tactics or weapons) in war in any form
    • BH 12-1 Crosby 11-2 PNG 10-3 NED 7-5 RSS 5-8 GCM 3-10 Lee 3-10 PAM 0-12   It will end in that order. BH still has Ned (7-5, 13-15) at home tonight. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...