Jump to content

Bridge City ineligible player ???

WO-S 89

By WO-S 89
in High School Baseball

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

WOSgrad
WOSgrad

Guys, we need to move on for this.  The committee has spoken and the assessments have been made.  From what I understand, Coach Landry moved on from this sometime last week as he gathered the p

Baba Ganoush32
Baba Ganoush32

Hopefully an appropriate and fair ruling can be made. Seems that different levels of severity should be in place for different violations...using your best pitcher too many innings/pitches should carr

demons95
demons95

Who cares who did it, He broke the rules. I wish someone would let them know so these fools quit saying HJ. I’m almost 100% it was Russian Collusion and they knew about this 2 years ago. 

Javelina

Javelina

Posted
Posted

Are we talking about actually playing in both games or playing in one game and being in uniform but not playing the other?  There is a big difference between the two.  It is common practice for a JV player to play in their game and be in uniform for the varsity game for maybe a pinch run situation but if the player never actually enters the game then it does not count against his number of games he can play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AllSportsMom

AllSportsMom

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Baseballer10 said:

If any of this is true does anyone know which district games they will forfeit?

I’ve heard it is 3-5 games so I would think it would be the games in which he exceeded the limit. Wouldn’t be right to say he was on roster but didn’t participate that night so doesn’t count but he was available so should count. Never know how that is interpreted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr Leroy

Mr Leroy

Posted
Posted

*Disclaimer*

All 2nd hand and hearsay information that I have heard from several different people.  So it could be 100% true, or nothing to it at all.  Time will tell.

 

Rumor has it a kid was playing JV and was being moved up to the Varsity and being used as a courtesy/pinch runner.  Supposedly he played the last game he could legally play in a season against Silsbee JV a little while back so he would be ineligible beginning with the Silsbee varsity game that night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cardinals1661

Cardinals1661

Posted
Posted

Looks like the JV had 11 scheduled games before the varsity game against silsbee.  If he played in all 11 he would have needed to actually play in 7 games on varsity to make him ineligible at that point.  Just dressing out and being in the dug out does not count.  The player has to actually enter the game to count as a game.  If a jv tournament was rained out it then adds more games he can play in since he didn't play in 3 tournaments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr Leroy

Mr Leroy

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Cardinals1661 said:

Looks like the JV had 11 scheduled games before the varsity game against silsbee.  If he played in all 11 he would have needed to actually play in 7 games on varsity to make him ineligible at that point.  Just dressing out and being in the dug out does not count.  The player has to actually enter the game to count as a game.  If a jv tournament was rained out it then adds more games he can play in since he didn't play in 3 tournaments.

How many varsity games did the kid play in before district started?  I dont know the answer, just asking the question.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,895
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    ronanhugo529
    Newest Member
    ronanhugo529
    Joined


  • Posts

    • baddog
      Political Memes

      By baddog · Posted

      That’s a president? How embarrassing. 
    • Coach_Izzy
      Boutte Retires - West Brook Hires Mike Thomas

      By Coach_Izzy · Posted

      Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • pine curtain
      Will Anahuac lose a district game ?

      By pine curtain · Posted

      So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Reagan
      Political Memes

      By Reagan · Posted

      Don't jump?!  What?!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...