Jump to content

The Democrat's Dream Ticket For 2020!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted

I rarely praise the Democratic Party, but I have to give them a rare attaboy.  Presently they’re doing everything they can to get Trump re-elected.  

The Party of Inclusion has stepped out there.  They’ve got a racist, Omar, who was supported by two other members, AOC & Tlaib.  The Gov. of Va could be construed as a racist, since he wore blackface.  The Lt. Gov. Is accused of sexual assault on two women.  All this, and not a peep from Dem Party Leadership, except a watered down Resolution.  What a bunch of hypocrites.

And now, in their infinite wisdom, they want to continue investigating Trump.  I’ve heard them compared to someone at the beach with their metal detector, looking for anything.  I’ll go a step further, the nitwits don’t even have a battery in the metal detector.  They’re consumed with TDS, literally.  The independent voters, being of relatively sound mind, will be turned off by this witch hunt.  And yes, witch hunt describes this perfectly.  A few Dems will be turned off and just not vote.  If the election was held Tuesday, Trump would win by a landslide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, Hagar said:

I rarely praise the Democratic Party, but I have to give them a rare attaboy.  Presently they’re doing everything they can to get Trump re-elected.  

The Party of Inclusion has stepped out there.  They’ve got a racist, Omar, who was supported by two other members, AOC & Tlaib.  The Gov. of Va could be construed as a racist, since he wore blackface.  The Lt. Gov. Is accused of sexual assault on two women.  All this, and not a peep from Dem Party Leadership, except a watered down Resolution.  What a bunch of hypocrites.

And now, in their infinite wisdom, they want to continue investigating Trump.  I’ve heard them compared to someone at the beach with their metal detector, looking for anything.  I’ll go a step further, the nitwits don’t even have a battery in the metal detector.  They’re consumed with TDS, literally.  The independent voters, being of relatively sound mind, will be turned off by this witch hunt.  And yes, witch hunt describes this perfectly.  A few Dems will be turned off and just not vote.  If the election was held Tuesday, Trump would win by a landslide.

Hagar -- this Democratic ticket would be the icing on Trump's 2020 victory cake!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Hagar said:

I rarely praise the Democratic Party, but I have to give them a rare attaboy.  Presently they’re doing everything they can to get Trump re-elected.  

The Party of Inclusion has stepped out there.  They’ve got a racist, Omar, who was supported by two other members, AOC & Tlaib.  The Gov. of Va could be construed as a racist, since he wore blackface.  The Lt. Gov. Is accused of sexual assault on two women.  All this, and not a peep from Dem Party Leadership, except a watered down Resolution.  What a bunch of hypocrites.

And now, in their infinite wisdom, they want to continue investigating Trump.  I’ve heard them compared to someone at the beach with their metal detector, looking for anything.  I’ll go a step further, the nitwits don’t even have a battery in the metal detector.  They’re consumed with TDS, literally.  The independent voters, being of relatively sound mind, will be turned off by this witch hunt.  And yes, witch hunt describes this perfectly.  A few Dems will be turned off and just not vote.  If the election was held Tuesday, Trump would win by a landslide.

It wasn’t a witch hunt. The Russians interfered with our election process. Do you care? Or is it another case of ends justifying means?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bobcat1

Bobcat1

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, VeryStableEnlightenedOne said:

Yeah no one is falling for the Abrams angle. I don’t know much about her, but on the surface, just reeks of fishing for votes as Palin 2.0 (although I’m sure Abrams has a significantly higher IQ).

Sanders / Warren is an easy win for Trump

Abrams has already stated that she would not be ready to be president until 2028. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, UT alum said:

It wasn’t a witch hunt. The Russians interfered with our election process. Do you care? Or is it another case of ends justifying means?

Lol.  How?  By posting some Facebook ads?  We are the absolute KINGS of sticking our American noses into other peoples' elections.  Shoot, we'll even depose your leader if he threatens our oil supply.  Every time we send our troops overseas, you can rest assured that we're "interfering" with somebody's leadership.

At least they weren't here actually voting multiple times. Or here illegally and voting in our elections.  Both of which are openly acknowledged and accepted by one particular party.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, UT alum said:

It wasn’t a witch hunt. The Russians interfered with our election process. Do you care? Or is it another case of ends justifying means?

I was alluding to this Congressional investigation Jerry Nadler has been hawking all weekend.  Yes, there was Russian interference, with not only the election, but our whole Govt.  Started with Hillary & the DNC, to Steele, to the Russians.  It’s as simple as that.  Started this whole bru-ha-ha.

There’s no way in hail Nadler and his bevy of clowns will come up with anything if Mueller and his 25 liberal attack dogs couldn’t find anything.  And Mueller had access to powers Congress can only dream of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Hagar said:

I was alluding to this Congressional investigation Jerry Nadler has been hawking all weekend.  Yes, there was Russian interference, with not only the election, but our whole Govt.  Started with Hillary & the DNC, to Steele, to the Russians.  It’s as simple as that.  Started this whole bru-ha-ha.

There’s no way in hail Nadler and his bevy of clowns will come up with anything if Mueller and his 25 liberal attack dogs couldn’t find anything.  And Mueller had access to powers Congress can only dream of.

He wasn’t exonerated on the obstruction charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, UT alum said:

He wasn’t exonerated on the obstruction charge.

Nor was he indicted.  Imo, Hillary and/or Obama need to be tried for obstruction, or treason.  The handpicked people in the Justice Dept were planning a Banana Republic coup.  That’s the real story, and arguably the reason the Dems continue their witch hunt.  We need a distraction.  Stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Nor was he indicted.  Imo, Hillary and/or Obama need to be tried for obstruction, or treason.  The handpicked people in the Justice Dept were planning a Banana Republic coup.  That’s the real story, and arguably the reason the Dems continue their witch hunt.  We need a distraction.  Stat.

Yes Hagar.   UT alum has insisted Hillary, by virtue of not being indicted, is innocent of all of these inferences.   Yet, the words "not indicted", is unacceptable for a Republican

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

So much for innocent until proven guilty, huh?

I didn’t say he was guilty. I’ve said wait for the report from the get go. The report is out. Doesn’t make him a better president. Just gives him ammo to keep up his attack on our free press and expression of disagreement with him and his policies. He’s still the lyingest president in history. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, UT alum said:

I didn’t say he was guilty. I’ve said wait for the report from the get go. The report is out. Doesn’t make him a better president. Just gives him ammo to keep up his attack on our free press and expression of disagreement with him and his policies. He’s still the lyingest president in history. 

lol...ok.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, UT alum said:

I didn’t say he was guilty. I’ve said wait for the report from the get go. The report is out. Doesn’t make him a better president. Just gives him ammo to keep up his attack on our free press and expression of disagreement with him and his policies. He’s still the lyingest president in history. 

Free press. Reach back and grab some constitution when needed, otherwise spit on it. Freedom of the press is the freedom to report facts about anything. Political opinions used to be on page 3C and noted as such. Now it is front page. Don’t ever use the words free press when talking about cnn. Facts confuse and enrage them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      It’s kinda weird…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Election interference. Cheating.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...