Jump to content

Mueller Report is Finished! Let the games begin!


UT alum

Recommended Posts

What is it about liberals?  They’ve lived and breathe Russian Collusion and Mueller’s Report for the last two years.  It clears Trump, and they’re hollering rigged.  Once their brains get something implanted, they ignore everything unless it affirms their position.

Btw, wonder if UTalum regrets getting off now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hagar said:

What is it about liberals?  They’ve lived and breathe Russian Collusion and Mueller’s Report for the last two years.  It clears Trump, and they’re hollering rigged.  Once their brains get something implanted, they ignore everything unless it affirms their position.

Btw, wonder if UTalum regrets getting off now?

How does one obstruct a non-crime?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VeryStableEnlightenedOne said:

Same goes for republicans. Shrieking for years about Obama being a Muslim, Hillary’s emails, etc. Middle class blaming the poor people (lmao) while the real wealth gap continues to widen

 

VSEO- Do you think Mr. Obama was overly sympathetic to Muslims?  Do you think that the erased Hillary emails were about Yoga and grandchildren?  Do you believe that the tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch was purely coincidental and, again, grandchildren talk was the subject of that meeting?  Do you think that the government is the best, most efficient solution to the wealth gap issue?

 

( if you are as enlightened as you suggest, you will respond to these questions rather than employing another failed deflection technique)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VeryStableEnlightenedOne said:

Answer 1: Overly sympathetic? Well, compared to Trump. Sure 

Answer 2: No

Answer 3: No

Answer 4: No

 

Thank you come again!

Wow VSEO, you need to be careful with answers like that.  There are liberals that will be calling you a racist, misogynist, inbred redneck for acknowledging truths that don't fit the Party line.  I'm beginning to think you're not only the king of pot stirrers, but only a halfa$$ democrat :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/19/2019 at 10:07 PM, Hagar said:

What is it about liberals?  They’ve lived and breathe Russian Collusion and Mueller’s Report for the last two years.  It clears Trump, and they’re hollering rigged.  Once their brains get something implanted, they ignore everything unless it affirms their position.

Btw, wonder if UTalum regrets getting off now?

No regrets, Hagar. Collusion has no meaning in the legal code. It’s called conspiracy, and has a high bar that Meuller couldn’t find enough evidence to bring charges. That’s part of why Barr’s press conference was a sham. He said no collusion parroting his boss,  five times without  making the conspiracy distinction once. Trump isn’t cleared of obstruction, just not charged. The report DID NOT exonerate him of obstruction. Read the report. But then again only the parts that you want to believe will be true, the rest witch hunt. I’m a third of the way through, and everything I’ve read has pretty much been reported already. So much for fake news. I think some of this needs Congressional investigation, but I don’t see the point in impeachment if there is no conviction, which there won’t be with 66 Senate votes required (I think). Investigation may reveal more corruption, however. I still say let 2020 decide. How does the man with a world class memory forget or fail to recall events related to his campaign 37 times. Guy’s still a clown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, UT alum said:

No regrets, Hagar. Collusion has no meaning in the legal code. It’s called conspiracy, and has a high bar that Meuller couldn’t find enough evidence to bring charges. That’s part of why Barr’s press conference was a sham. He said no collusion parroting his boss,  five times without  making the conspiracy distinction once. Trump isn’t cleared of obstruction, just not charged. The report DID NOT exonerate him of obstruction. Read the report. But then again only the parts that you want to believe will be true, the rest witch hunt. I’m a third of the way through, and everything I’ve read has pretty much been reported already. So much for fake news. I think some of this needs Congressional investigation, but I don’t see the point in impeachment if there is no conviction, which there won’t be with 66 Senate votes required (I think). Investigation may reveal more corruption, however. I still say let 2020 decide. How does the man with a world class memory forget or fail to recall events related to his campaign 37 times. Guy’s still a clown.

I believe it was Mr. Comey who said he didnt remember in excess of 200 times.  Is that, somehow, different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, stevenash said:

I believe it was Mr. Comey who said he didnt remember in excess of 200 times.  Is that, somehow, different?

I just now read UT Alum's post, and was all set to reply with a short, stinging exposure of his glaring TDS statement...but then read your reply. Mine was almost identical. In fact...yours is probably better, in that I was probably going to add the TDS aspect in schoolboy fashion.

27 minutes ago, UT alum said:

No regrets, Hagar. Collusion has no meaning in the legal code. It’s called conspiracy, and has a high bar that Meuller couldn’t find enough evidence to bring charges. That’s part of why Barr’s press conference was a sham. He said no collusion parroting his boss,  five times without  making the conspiracy distinction once. Trump isn’t cleared of obstruction, just not charged. The report DID NOT exonerate him of obstruction. Read the report. But then again only the parts that you want to believe will be true, the rest witch hunt. I’m a third of the way through, and everything I’ve read has pretty much been reported already. So much for fake news. I think some of this needs Congressional investigation, but I don’t see the point in impeachment if there is no conviction, which there won’t be with 66 Senate votes required (I think). Investigation may reveal more corruption, however. I still say let 2020 decide. How does the man with a world class memory forget or fail to recall events related to his campaign 37 times. Guy’s still a clown.

UT Alum, please answer Nash's pertinent question and explain how Trump can be a clown by forgetting 37 times, but Comey can plead ignorance 200+ times without such retribution or suspicion? In fact, please refute your obvious TDS symptoms by laying out a basis for your "clown" comment. Keep in mind that your "evidence" must apply across the board...in which your analysis will be understandably ridiculed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

No regrets, Hagar. Collusion has no meaning in the legal code. It’s called conspiracy, and has a high bar that Meuller couldn’t find enough evidence to bring charges. That’s part of why Barr’s press conference was a sham. He said no collusion parroting his boss,  five times without  making the conspiracy distinction once. Trump isn’t cleared of obstruction, just not charged. The report DID NOT exonerate him of obstruction. Read the report. But then again only the parts that you want to believe will be true, the rest witch hunt. I’m a third of the way through, and everything I’ve read has pretty much been reported already. So much for fake news. I think some of this needs Congressional investigation, but I don’t see the point in impeachment if there is no conviction, which there won’t be with 66 Senate votes required (I think). Investigation may reveal more corruption, however. I still say let 2020 decide. How does the man with a world class memory forget or fail to recall events related to his campaign 37 times. Guy’s still a clown.

Welcome back.  We just lost one liberal, so we needed a sub.  But be careful of statements like the “Trump couldn’t recall or forgot 37 times”.  He’s a stark amateur compared to Comey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Englebert said:

If I had around 20 high-priced veteran lawyers ready to pounce on my every word, and who I knew were not fans, and had a history of perjury traps, my number of "I don't recall" answers would be equal to the number of questions asked.

This is the correct answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...