Jump to content

Faith Family vs Yates


Recommended Posts

I am pulling for Yates but I’ve had a feeling the Region 2 team would be the team to beat due to being so battle tested.  I hope I’m wrong and the Lions wear them down like they have almost all teams they’ve faced.   I do think this should be the de facto championship game.  Decatur has the ability to slow the game down and maybe hang around and pull off an upset in a low scoring affair.  But I think either of these teams losing to the winner of the other semi-final would be a considerable upset. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Faith Family in the UIL state tournament is a joke.  The head coach was the head coach at Cedar Hill and FF offered him 6 figures to come over and allowed him to bring his whole staff.  Guess what...Cedar Hill players followed.  This is why you havent heard from Cedar Hill lately.  It is fitting that FF and Yates have to play each other and a sign of the sad sad state of UIL basketball.  And that is before you get to Madison being in the 3A tournament which is an even bigger joke.  HISD and DISD use their open enrollment status and “magnet programs” to manipulate their enrollments.  FF has about 200 kids in the school.....but 10 of them just happen to be good enough to get to the 4A state tournament?  Please.  It is becoming a joke what all is allowed and a shame.  It is ruining high school basketball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BmtPanther34 said:

Faith Family in the UIL state tournament is a joke.  The head coach was the head coach at Cedar Hill and FF offered him 6 figures to come over and allowed him to bring his whole staff.  Guess what...Cedar Hill players followed.  This is why you havent heard from Cedar Hill lately.  It is fitting that FF and Yates have to play each other and a sign of the sad sad state of UIL basketball.  And that is before you get to Madison being in the 3A tournament which is an even bigger joke.  HISD and DISD use their open enrollment status and “magnet programs” to manipulate their enrollments.  FF has about 200 kids in the school.....but 10 of them just happen to be good enough to get to the 4A state tournament?  Please.  It is becoming a joke what all is allowed and a shame.  It is ruining high school basketball.

I think many of us have stated pretty much the same views over the past several years.  Even though my Tigers have been the standard the last few years, I still have fealt that overall a school such  as Silsbee having to compete with some of these big city “small” schools is not quite an equal playing field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BmtPanther34 said:

Faith Family in the UIL state tournament is a joke.  The head coach was the head coach at Cedar Hill and FF offered him 6 figures to come over and allowed him to bring his whole staff.  Guess what...Cedar Hill players followed.  This is why you havent heard from Cedar Hill lately.  It is fitting that FF and Yates have to play each other and a sign of the sad sad state of UIL basketball.  And that is before you get to Madison being in the 3A tournament which is an even bigger joke.  HISD and DISD use their open enrollment status and “magnet programs” to manipulate their enrollments.  FF has about 200 kids in the school.....but 10 of them just happen to be good enough to get to the 4A state tournament?  Please.  It is becoming a joke what all is allowed and a shame.  It is ruining high school basketball.

I am not a fan of charter schools for reasons that go way beyond basketball.  There are a myriad of ways in which they are hurting public education.  I would say that when the highest ranking official in education in our country is an extremely vocal advocate for these charter schools, it’s not likely to change any time soon.  

But that’s a different discussion for a different board.   Your point is a good one and well taken. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I seen the name pop up in the TABC rankings, I knew something was fishy. I thought Deion Sanders had a new school like Prime Prep. I didnt know they would be a le to play in the UIL. Everyone remembers a few years ago when Mark Cuban hand selected an AAU team to play at Bridgeport. 4A is a middle ground I guess. A charter school of 200 has no reason playing in a 4A UIL tourney. They are like a junior college with all the recruiting. I actually hope Yates win to keep the title in Region 3 and shut down the nonsense in Dallas. Yates should combine with Kashmere and go to 5A. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, TxHoops said:

I am pulling for Yates but I’ve had a feeling the Region 2 team would be the team to beat due to being so battle tested.  I hope I’m wrong and the Lions wear them down like they have almost all teams they’ve faced.   I do think this should be the de facto championship game.  Decatur has the ability to slow the game down and maybe hang around and pull off an upset in a low scoring affair.  But I think either of these teams losing to the winner of the other semi-final would be a considerable upset. 

I think Decatur might surprise some people and it might not be as big of an upset as some think if they win it all. They have some length, play very solid defense and are well coached. Similar to Argyle teams of the past. But one difference is I think they will push the ball and look for easy baskets more in transition than your typical walk it up the court and run your half court sets. Yates/FF May negate that though. Should be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, yepyep said:

I think Decatur might surprise some people and it might not be as big of an upset as some think if they win it all. They have some length, play very solid defense and are well coached. Similar to Argyle teams of the past. But one difference is I think they will push the ball and look for easy baskets more in transition than your typical walk it up the court and run your half court sets. Yates/FF May negate that though. Should be interesting.

That’s what I’ve heard (similar to Argyle).  When those type teams take care of the ball and control tempo, tends to really frustrate teams that like to run and gun.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TxHoops said:

That’s what I’ve heard (similar to Argyle).  When those type teams take care of the ball and control tempo, tends to really frustrate teams that like to run and gun.  

True.  You cant argue with their success.  One thing i have always felt  is that style also leads to closer games with teams that you may be better than as well, leaving the possibility of a defeat.  I guess what i am saying is they arent normally going to run away from good teams and get a big lead.  Whereas a team that plays like we do does just that many times.  The question is of course which suits your team better and which style do you have more confidence in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ST413 said:

True.  You cant argue with their success.  One thing i have always felt  is that style also leads to closer games with teams that you may be better than as well, leaving the possibility of a defeat.  I guess what i am saying is they arent normally going to run away from good teams and get a big lead.  Whereas a team that plays like we do does just that many times.  The question is of course which suits your team better and which style do you have more confidence in.  

Exactly.  Keep the game low scoring and give yourself a puncher’s chance.  You’re may not be able to run away from more athletic teams but you can hit a shot at the end to upset them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Exactly.  Keep the game low scoring and give yourself a puncher’s chance.  You’re may not be able to run away from more athletic teams but you can hit a shot at the end to upset them.  

Yes but you can also give the other team the same shot is what i am getting at.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yates is a good team but they are here because Silsbee self destructed in the second half last Saturday.  Oak Cliff is a tested team and have played a much tougher schedule and a postseason that's arguably tougher as well.  The middle is not going to be porous like it was against the Tigers so outside shooting will be critical.  If they are shooting well it's still no guarantee but if they aren't they won't win. 

It's a "career" magnet school (please, I may have been born at night, but not last night!)  against a "charter" school.  I tend to go with the lesser of two evils which is Yates.  But then I'll be pulling for the winner of the Decatur - Liberty Hill game in the final because those schools are from towns.  And 4A schools should be from towns.  One high school districts.  You know?  Like Sour Lake or Bridge City or Lumberton or even Silsbee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have t faced anyone that will apply pressure all 32 minutes 

32 minutes ago, JimThorpe said:

Yates is a good team but they are here because Silsbee self destructed in the second half last Saturday.  Oak Cliff is a tested team and have played a much tougher schedule and a postseason that's arguably tougher as well.  The middle is not going to be porous like it was against the Tigers so outside shooting will be critical.  If they are shooting well it's still no guarantee but if they aren't they won't win. 

It's a "career" magnet school (please, I may have been born at night, but not last night!)  against a "charter" school.  I tend to go with the lesser of two evils which is Yates.  But then I'll be pulling for the winner of the Decatur - Liberty Hill game in the final because those schools are from towns.  And 4A schools should be from towns.  One high school districts.  You know?  Like Sour Lake or Bridge City or Lumberton or even Silsbee.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JimThorpe said:

Yates is a good team but they are here because Silsbee self destructed in the second half last Saturday.  Oak Cliff is a tested team and have played a much tougher schedule and a postseason that's arguably tougher as well.  The middle is not going to be porous like it was against the Tigers so outside shooting will be critical.  If they are shooting well it's still no guarantee but if they aren't they won't win. 

It's a "career" magnet school (please, I may have been born at night, but not last night!)  against a "charter" school.  I tend to go with the lesser of two evils which is Yates.  But then I'll be pulling for the winner of the Decatur - Liberty Hill game in the final because those schools are from towns.  And 4A schools should be from towns.  One high school districts.  You know?  Like Sour Lake or Bridge City or Lumberton or even Silsbee.

Ummmh the same could be said for  the yates vs silsbee game last year .. yates was up for most of the game last year with their best player being restricted. 

And yates played in a national tournament they beat powerhouse Christ the king out of New York. They broke a record in that tournament for points being scored.They also beat a powerhouse school out of St. Louis.

And the argument for inner city  public schools goes both ways. A lot of kids that are zoned to yates , Wheatley , kashmere etc.. don’t go there. A lot of the elite players that are zoned to those schools attend charter , home and private schools. That’s why those schools are now better than the public schools. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Who That said:

Who ever wins this game . WILL destroy the winners of this first game..

You seem confident it will be a blowout. So set the line and give me Decatur and the points.

No go on Liberty Hill.

 

It’s funny how these slow, unathleitc, half court teams like Brock, Ponder, and Argyle don’t look the part yet seem to keep winning championships.  

Decatur will give Yates/FF a game. I will be shocked if they don’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, yepyep said:

You seem confident it will be a blowout. So set the line and give me Decatur and the points.

No go on Liberty Hill.

 

It’s funny how these slow, unathleitc, half court teams like Brock, Ponder, and Argyle don’t look the part yet seem to keep winning championships.  

Decatur will give Yates/FF a game. I will be shocked if they don’t.

Welp Decatur didn’t do their part. Ugly game. Good luck to the remaining teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, bayou city 713 said:

Ummmh the same could be said for  the yates vs silsbee game last year .. yates was up for most of the game last year with their best player being restricted. 

And yates played in a national tournament they beat powerhouse Christ the king out of New York. They broke a record in that tournament for points being scored.They also beat a powerhouse school out of St. Louis.

And the argument for inner city  public schools goes both ways. A lot of kids that are zoned to yates , Wheatley , kashmere etc.. don’t go there. A lot of the elite players that are zoned to those schools attend charter , home and private schools. That’s why those schools are now better than the public schools. 

 

 

Thanks Faith Family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...