Jump to content

West Orange-Stark turf


Majestyk

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING said:

Let's get one thing straight. I don't like the design, so what. I'm pretty sure there a greater tragedies in the world. Lcm will be  the first official victory on it for wos. 

Man your so negative, maybe it’s time for you to choose a different team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Smh.  Some of yall WO-S fans, I'll never understand.  NOW the turf is trash.  'WOW' is all I have to say right now.  This is worse than the torrential rainfall loss to Silsbee excuse..

First I never made an excuse about any lost. A lost is a lost. Second I'm negative because because I feel differently about something. The turf is fine. The design I don't care for. Nothing wrong with me not liking it. It's a bunch stadiums and arenas I don't like. I like infinity war better than I like endgame. Guess I'm just a terrible person and guess what, I COULD CARELESS ABOUT WHAT PEOPLE THINK. if hair piece can say what ever he wants and get elected, then I don't see a problem with what anybody has to say ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING said:

First I never made an excuse about any lost. A lost is a lost. Second I'm negative because because I feel differently about something. The turf is fine. The design I don't care for. Nothing wrong with me not liking it. It's a bunch stadiums and arenas I don't like. I like infinity war better than I like endgame. Guess I'm just a terrible person and guess what, I COULD CARELESS ABOUT WHAT PEOPLE THINK. if hair piece can say what ever he wants and get elected, then I don't see a problem with what anybody has to say ever.

You are entitled to your opinion and I do respect it.  Your logic is  huge head scratcher to me.  Thats all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING said:

The design I wanted had that and then some but orange tx keeps it plain Jane 

I didn't know there were multiple design proposals. Was that something that would have added more cost to the bond? Maybe this can be added to the field at a later date. Perhaps funded by booster club and private donation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

I didn't know there were multiple design proposals. Was that something that would have added more cost to the bond? Maybe this can be added to the field at a later date. Perhaps funded by booster club and private donation.

Well, let's remember.  The details of the field are not finished yet.  I mean, look at the field, there are no numbers painted on it yet.

Some folks just need to settle down, be patient and wait until all of the details on the field are completed before commenting how "plain jane" the field is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Well, let's remember.  The details of the field are not finished yet.  I mean, look at the field, there are no numbers painted on it yet.

Some folks just need to settle down, be patient and wait until all of the details on the field are completed before commenting how "plain jane" the field is.

I saw numbers they look good. I guess my WOS buddy is going out there every day lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

I didn't know there were multiple design proposals. Was that something that would have added more cost to the bond? Maybe this can be added to the field at a later date. Perhaps funded by booster club and private donation.

No it would have been the same price but I don't even care anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

I didn't know there were multiple design proposals. Was that something that would have added more cost to the bond? Maybe this can be added to the field at a later date. Perhaps funded by booster club and private donation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    henrysmith
    Newest Member
    henrysmith
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I don't know who the other coach was, but this guy has no head coaching experience, and minimal high school experience.  after graduating from college he spent a year each in defensive coaching positions on bad college teams before moving to high school.  Not sure what he did from 2019-2022. Last year he spent was at cleveland, who was terrible.  He may be great, and I don't care one way or another, but if Liberty passed up a coach with a history of success for a virtual unknown with no previous success at the high school or college level I'd be pretty frustrated if I was a panther fan.
    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...