Jump to content

Beaumont United 45 Galena Park North Shore 42/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

Congrats!  Warms my heart to see these kids and coach go and win in that hostile environment against the highly ranked NS Mustangs, even though many early was super crucial on the United coaching staff.  Waiting on those detractors to give their feedback.  Or maybe they were watching a Mid county game...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great job players and coach, both boys and girls. You have started something great, I say this with much LOVE I worked the Central campus and the Ozen lol and some Lil Brook, some know what I mean Brook not West Brook , even played at HEBERT you make me feel like I'm walking the Panther grounds when watching you and walking your campus with you 

Thank You

Champions make Champions 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about the future?  How far can United go?  Nobody in 3 is ranked higher than North Shore going into this game.  San Antonio?  In the first year of existence?  Surely it will be either United or North Shore.

Memorial has climbed to No. 7.  They are the highest ranked team in Region 3 with Barbers Hill right behind.

Silsbee of course is the highest ranked team in Region 3 and I think the favorite to go to San Antonio.

Three area schools at the State Tournament?  That would be remarkable.  I hope it happens.

FYI.  I'm stretching it a bit and claiming North Shore and Barbers Hill each as an "area school"  but I refuse to call Yates that.  How's that for selective logic!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, JimThorpe said:

What about the future?  How far can United go?  Nobody in 3 is ranked higher than North Shore going into this game.  San Antonio?  In the first year of existence?  Surely it will be either United or North Shore.

Memorial has climbed to No. 7.  They are the highest ranked team in Region 3 with Barbers Hill right behind.

Silsbee of course is the highest ranked team in Region 3 and I think the favorite to go to San Antonio.

Three area schools at the State Tournament?  That would be remarkable.  I hope it happens.

FYI.  I'm stretching it a bit and claiming North Shore and Barbers Hill each as an "area school"  but I refuse to call Yates that.  How's that for selective logic!

Neither North Shore nor United will be favored in Region III in my opinion.   North shore is the highest rated based on record, but that is a very tough region.  Morton Ranch, Dickinson, Summer Creek, Elkins, Sam Houston, etc, are all tough teams.  Not saying BU or NS couldn’t make it make it out of that region, but it would be surprising if they did.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JimThorpe said:

What about the future?  How far can United go?  Nobody in 3 is ranked higher than North Shore going into this game.  San Antonio?  In the first year of existence?  Surely it will be either United or North Shore.

Memorial has climbed to No. 7.  They are the highest ranked team in Region 3 with Barbers Hill right behind.

Silsbee of course is the highest ranked team in Region 3 and I think the favorite to go to San Antonio.

Three area schools at the State Tournament?  That would be remarkable.  I hope it happens.

FYI.  I'm stretching it a bit and claiming North Shore and Barbers Hill each as an "area school"  but I refuse to call Yates that.  How's that for selective logic!

Don’t forget EC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TxHoops said:

Neither North Shore nor United will be favored in Region III in my opinion.   North shore is the highest rated based on record, but that is a very tough region.  Morton Ranch, Dickinson, Summer Creek, Elkins, Sam Houston, etc, are all tough teams.  Not saying BU or NS couldn’t make it make it out of that region, but it would be surprising if they did.  

I was just discussing this with a fellow Central alum.  His son is the star player on Morton Ranch.  Both of agreed that region 3 is a grindhouse.  But they beat Cinco Ranch 3 times, the same Cinco Ranch team that have United it's worst loss all season.  

But I think United is peaking at the right time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JimThorpe said:

What about the future?  How far can United go?  Nobody in 3 is ranked higher than North Shore going into this game.  San Antonio?  In the first year of existence?  Surely it will be either United or North Shore.

Memorial has climbed to No. 7.  They are the highest ranked team in Region 3 with Barbers Hill right behind.

Silsbee of course is the highest ranked team in Region 3 and I think the favorite to go to San Antonio.

Three area schools at the State Tournament?  That would be remarkable.  I hope it happens.

FYI.  I'm stretching it a bit and claiming North Shore and Barbers Hill each as an "area school"  but I refuse to call Yates that.  How's that for selective logic!

North Shore has lost some of their steam after the loss to United in Beaumont.  I don't think NS will be a factor.  I dint even think they'll make the regional tournament...United just needs to keep playing good ball and getting better.  Good thing about the playoffs is those other guys need to play good ball too or they'll be going fishing early as well.  

Memorial is good, really good, but it just don't sit well for me with the close games with the Ant Mound.  The Memorial team last year, you seen early that those guys were special and had an extra gear they always went to in the 4th period.  

Silsbee is a runaway freight train to state.  But there, it concerns me if they meet a team with length or a team with a dominant and skilled big man.  But I'm sure they'll cross that bridge when they get to it.  Because Silsbee will be the most experienced team at the tournament regardless of classification, imo...

What did EC lose from last year's team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

North Shore has lost some of their steam after the loss to United in Beaumont.  I don't think NS will be a factor.  I dint even think they'll make the regional tournament...United just needs to keep playing good ball and getting better.  Good thing about the playoffs is those other guys need to play good ball too or they'll be going fishing early as well.  

Memorial is good, really good, but it just don't sit well for me with the close games with the Ant Mound.  The Memorial team last year, you seen early that those guys were special and had an extra gear they always went to in the 4th period.  

Silsbee is a runaway freight train to state.  But there, it concerns me if they meet a team with length or a team with a dominant and skilled big man.  But I'm sure they'll cross that bridge when they get to it.  Because Silsbee will be the most experienced team at the tournament regardless of classification, imo...

What did EC lose from last year's team?

Nothing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
    • Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.
    • Surely you're aware of the great lengths Trump has gone to disrupt the elections and destroy the careers of republican politicians who haven't supported some of his most outlandish claims, or dared to question him or disagree with him about January 6.  You and I actually agree on this issue, although it must only go one way for you, because Trump's actions against republicans who didn't fall into lockstep with him is one of my biggest concerns about reelecting him.  The fact that he took action to affect literally hundreds of republican primaries from national elections down to municipal levels across the country, is concerning. It would've been one thing had he done it in an effort to help republicans win. Instead his purpose was to push out his perceived detractors and install MAGA politicians at every level of government in as many places as possible, and has resulted in a fractured republican party.
    • Lmao. No doubt. With a name like that, he would've gotten made fun of even if he was home-schooled.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...