Jump to content

East Chambers 100 Hardin 50/FINAL


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, GoFundMe said:
7 minutes ago, GoFundMe said:

Last year Hardin lost to East Chambers 101-47 but did not play Good Samaritan.  Should they have played GS last year in order to not get beat by 50+ ?  Asking for a coach

 

3A school with this schedule needs no explanation:

Nov. 10 - at Fred Good Samaritan, 70-11

Nov. 13 - at Tarkington, ccl

Nov. 16 - Fred Good Samaritan, 63-18

Nov. 19 - at Spurger, 56-47

Nov. 27 - Port Arthur Bob Hope, 66-18

Nov. 29-Dec. 1 - Deweyville Tournament

             Colmesneil, 64-46

             Port Arthur Bob Hope, 74-32

             Hamshire-Fannett JV, 63-17

             Deweyville, 86-44

             Brookeland, 60-41

Dec. 4 - Goodrich, 77-12

Dec. 6-8 - High Island Tourament

            Deweyville, 44-28

            Sabine Pass, 54-28

            Port Arthur Bob Hope, 58-28

            High Island, 58-17

            West Hardin, 37-36

Dec. 11 - at Hull-Daisetta, W

Dec. 13-15 - Baytown Christian Tournament

         Grace Christian, W

          Baytown Christian, L

         CHSA W

Dec. 18 - Kirbyville, 56-42*

 

Hardin has played two schools that are 3A and that is only because they have to play them (district games). All other opponents are 2A, 1A and small private schools. Give me a break.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

3A school with this schedule needs no explanation:

Nov. 10 - at Fred Good Samaritan, 70-11

Nov. 13 - at Tarkington, ccl

Nov. 16 - Fred Good Samaritan, 63-18

Nov. 19 - at Spurger, 56-47

Nov. 27 - Port Arthur Bob Hope, 66-18

Nov. 29-Dec. 1 - Deweyville Tournament

             Colmesneil, 64-46

             Port Arthur Bob Hope, 74-32

             Hamshire-Fannett JV, 63-17

             Deweyville, 86-44

             Brookeland, 60-41

Dec. 4 - Goodrich, 77-12

Dec. 6-8 - High Island Tourament

            Deweyville, 44-28

            Sabine Pass, 54-28

            Port Arthur Bob Hope, 58-28

            High Island, 58-17

            West Hardin, 37-36

Dec. 11 - at Hull-Daisetta, W

Dec. 13-15 - Baytown Christian Tournament

         Grace Christian, W

          Baytown Christian, L

         CHSA W

Dec. 18 - Kirbyville, 56-42*

 

Hardin has played two schools that are 3A and that is only because they have to play them (district games). All other opponents are 2A, 1A and small private schools. Give me a break.

 

 

I'm not sure I understand why you want Hardin to play teams they can't beat ?  What good does that do for the program? They lost to West Hardin who is 2a, so who should they schedule (larger) than West Hardin in order to lose a bunch of games so the coach can get run off or disappoint the community or parents of players.  I just don't comprehend the suggested idea that any team needs to or MUST play up in order to get respect so they can finish 5th or 7th in their own district and miss the playoffs again?  Please help me understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GoFundMe said:

I'm not sure I understand why you want Hardin to play teams they can't beat ?  What good does that do for the program? They lost to West Hardin who is 2a, so who should they schedule (larger) than West Hardin in order to lose a bunch of games so the coach can get run off or disappoint the community or parents of players.  I just don't comprehend the suggested idea that any team needs to or MUST play up in order to get respect so they can finish 5th or 7th in their own district and miss the playoffs again?  Please help me understand.

So you don't think playing a few teams at same level or up would help make the team better and more prepared for better teams?

IMO, the schedule that Hardin has played so far gives them a false sense of how good (or bad) they really are. Of those 18 wins, none are quality wins. How is that making the team better.

And you state that if they were to lose several games, the coach would get run off. Well is that what's important here, getting wins over weak teams or getting better as a team.

Like I said, I would much rather be 18-12 and going to playoffs than be 24-6 and missing playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

So you don't think playing a few teams at same level or up would help make the team better and more prepared for better teams?

IMO, the schedule that Hardin has played so far gives them a false sense of how good (or bad) they really are. Of those 18 wins, none are quality wins. How is that making the team better.

And you state that if they were to lose several games, the coach would get run off. Well is that what's important here, getting wins over weak teams or getting better as a team.

Like I said, I would much rather be 18-12 and going to playoffs than be 24-6 and missing playoffs.

The point is they played a tougher schedule last year and they still did not make the playoffs.  They did NOT play GS last year and lost by 54 at EC.  They played GS this year and lost by 50.  Anybody else getting this? It's Hardin we're talking about by the way.  Is AAW on Warrens case about who they have or have not played and why they haven't been relevant in BASKETBALL in 15 years like Hardin has? Nope.  We just want Hardin playing tougher competition in non-district games so they will have some L's on the schedule and we won't have to discuss at all why they are 18-3 or whatever they are.  Am I right ? Thought so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GoFundMe said:

The point is they played a tougher schedule last year and they still did not make the playoffs.  They did NOT play GS last year and lost by 54 at EC.  They played GS this year and lost by 50.  Anybody else getting this? It's Hardin we're talking about by the way.  Is AAW on Warrens case about who they have or have not played and why they haven't been relevant in BASKETBALL in 15 years like Hardin has? Nope.  We just want Hardin playing tougher competition in non-district games so they will have some L's on the schedule and we won't have to discuss at all why they are 18-3 or whatever they are.  Am I right ? Thought so.

No you are not right.

And I am not talking just Good Samaritan. You can choose several from that schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, uknowit2 said:

It’s just like football. “We’re  5-0”, what a great year”.  We were “18-3” what a great year.

i do like  the mighty Hornets for the 4th spot.

Nobody says it's a great year in Hardin.  Nobody is on this site asking for poll respect for Hardin.  It's Hardin for god sake.  If they make the playoffs in basketball it's the first time in 10-15 years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GoFundMe said:

Nobody says it's a great year in Hardin.  Nobody is on this site asking for poll respect for Hardin.  It's Hardin for god sake.  If they make the playoffs in basketball it's the first time in 10-15 years.  

My apologies. 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2014 are the playoff appearances in the last 20 years.

 

According to the banners hanging in the gymnasium.  But, still......not a lot to hang the ole' hat on in regards to basketball in hardin america.  According to one source, they advanced to the regional tournament in 2001-2002 season and fell short to Frankston in the Regional Final - but the banner in the gym says region quarterfinalist -which is incorrect. Duane Joubert was the Basketball coach during this run in the early 2000's - who I did not know coached at Hardin before going to Kountze.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardin isn't beating EC, OF or Buna. I think AAW is trying to make the point that the last playoff spot is going to be between Hardin, Kountze and Warren and a little tougher schedule  may prepare Hardin to beat those two teams a little more. The last playoff spot in this district will come down to matchups and foul trouble. I don't know anything about Hardins lineup so I have no idea how they will match up. I have seen Kountze and Warren and neither has much depth or post presence. Warren did have a left handed kid that had a decent stroke. They lost their PG to foul trouble in the game that I saw them and didn't handle pressure without him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GoFundMe said:

My apologies. 2001, 2002, 2003, 2008, 2012, 2014 are the playoff appearances in the last 20 years.

 

According to the banners hanging in the gymnasium.  But, still......not a lot to hang the ole' hat on in regards to basketball in hardin america.  According to one source, they advanced to the regional tournament in 2001-2002 season and fell short to Frankston in the Regional Final - but the banner in the gym says region quarterfinalist -which is incorrect. Duane Joubert was the Basketball coach during this run in the early 2000's - who I did not know coached at Hardin before going to Kountze.

They had some kids they could go from 2000-2004 ish. Think they moved up in class around 2004 which slowed their success, then the loss of Joubert obviously hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, whsalum said:

Hardin isn't beating EC, OF or Buna. I think AAW is trying to make the point that the last playoff spot is going to be between Hardin, Kountze and Warren and a little tougher schedule  may prepare Hardin to beat those two teams a little more. The last playoff spot in this district will come down to matchups and foul trouble. I don't know anything about Hardins lineup so I have no idea how they will match up. I have seen Kountze and Warren and neither has much depth or post presence. Warren did have a left handed kid that had a decent stroke. They lost their PG to foul trouble in the game that I saw them and didn't handle pressure without him. 

Guess we will know more Friday when Hardin hosts Warren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, yepyep said:

They had some kids they could go from 2000-2004 ish. Think they moved up in class around 2004 which slowed their success, then the loss of Joubert obviously hurt.

I thought Hardin / EC and Anahuac have been in the same district since the beginning of time. Yes, I am exaggerating but they have been together at least the better part of 30 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a dirtbag (your descriptor) does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...Dirtbags. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comment were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...