Jump to content

Build Wall or Shut Down the Border


Hagar

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, baddog said:

The kids wouldn't suffer any more than they do now. The moms use the stamps for themselves and send the kids to school hungry for their only meals. The free lunch program feeds them.

FEMA replaced the food in my house from the storm that I bought and paid for with my own money. My tax money reimbursed me. I didn't sponge anything off of the government. The non workers do that.

I bet you haven't  have or have had kids under 25 on your insurance either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2019 at 0:24 PM, Kountzer said:

 You're probably as truthful and Trump.

Besides, it came from the same place that the notion that a big, beautiful concrete wall will solve this countries' border issues.

The 

This is the hidden content, please
, which was passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President George W. Bush, authorized about 700 miles of fencing along certain stretches of land between the border of the United States and Mexico.

The act also authorized the use of more vehicle barriers, checkpoints and lighting to curb illegal immigration, and the use of advanced technology such as satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles.

At the time the act was being considered, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer were all members of the Senate. (Schumer of New York is now the Senate minority leader.)

Obama, Clinton, Schumer and 23 other Democratic senators voted in favor of the act when it passed in the Senate by a vote of 80 to 19.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

stevenash,

Democrats plan piecemeal appropriation bill starting with the treasury department and IRS. The action is so people can receive tax returns. Curious to see if all those that feel he should not cave will allow there tax return to be refunded months or years from  now. Will people encourage Republicans to pass the bill because now they will begin to feel the effect . I have stated in previous post that he does not need Congressional approval. Why is he calling those who are not receiving pay checks Democrats?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Law Man said:

stevenash,

Democrats plan piecemeal appropriation bill starting with the treasury department and IRS. The action is so people can receive tax returns. Curious to see if all those that feel he should not cave will allow there tax return to be refunded months or years from  now. Will people encourage Republicans to pass the bill because now they will begin to feel the effect . I have stated in previous post that he does not need Congressional approval. Why is he calling those who are not receiving pay checks Democrats?  

I was not aware that he was calling those who are not receiving pay Democrats.  Can you point me to a link?  I want to see if i interpret in the same context as you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Law Man said:

LumraiderFan, 

your brother is a Federal Worker who is " non essential "  however I strongly ddisagree. Do you believe he is a part of the swamp? Should his job be done away with because it can be done in the public or private sector? 

His job should be done at the state level.  No need for the fed gov to have that much control and power.

And have no doubt, it is all about control and power, and so many buy into the nonsense that the fed gov is the answer to all our problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stevenash said:

I was not aware that he was calling those who are not receiving pay Democrats.  Can you point me to a link?  I want to see if i interpret in the same context as you.

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

TThe 

This is the hidden content, please
, which was passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President George W. Bush, authorized about 700 miles of fencing along certain stretches of land between the border of the United States and Mexico.

The act also authorized the use of more vehicle barriers, checkpoints and lighting to curb illegal immigration, and the use of advanced technology such as satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles.

At the time the act was being considered, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer were all members of the Senate. (Schumer of New York is now the Senate minority leader.)

Obama, Clinton, Schumer and 23 other Democratic senators voted in favor of the act when it passed in the Senate by a vote of 80 to 19.

Donald Trump  tweeted on Jan. 5, 2019 at 9:48 am. 

I don't care that MOST workers not getting paid are Democrats. How did he determine MOST workers? Where's the data?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

His job should be done at the state level.  No need for the fed gov to have that much control and power.

And have no doubt, it is all about control and power, and so many buy into the nonsense that the fed gov is the answer to all our problems.

Can I ask what his job is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Law Man said:

Can I ask what his job is?

He’s an engineer and there are departments on the state levels that do the same thing he does.

So many of the federal departments should be abolished because it is already being handled at the state level.

The fed gov is ridiculously bloated and should be cut back to only the responsibilities laid out in the Constitution.

Won’t ever happen, but it should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

He’s an engineer and there are departments on the state levels that do the same thing he does.

So many of the federal departments should be abolished because it is already being handled at the state level.

The fed gov is ridiculously bloated and should be cut back to only the responsibilities laid out in the Constitution.

Won’t ever happen, but it should.

What you may not be aware of is that he may have a security clearance and his job is very important.  Chemical Engineer, Computer Engineer, and many others cannot be done in the state level. I agree that jobs like TSO can be done at the state level. Screeners worked at airports before Homeland Security was created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Law Man said:

Donald Trump  tweeted on Jan. 5, 2019 at 9:48 am. 

I don't care that MOST workers not getting paid are Democrats. How did he determine MOST workers? Where's the data?

“I don’t care that most of the workers not getting paid are Democrats, I want to stop the Shutdown as soon as we are in agreement on Strong Border Security!” the president tweeted. “I am in the White House ready to go, where are the Dems?” - I interpret that as meaning it doesnt matter who is the victim of the shutdown.  He did not intend for the shutdown to have a particular impact on a particular segment of society.  Apparently you interpreted it as he doesnt care about their pay if they are democrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Law Man said:

What you may not be aware of is that he may have a security clearance and his job is very important.  Chemical Engineer, Computer Engineer, and many others cannot be done in the state level. I agree that jobs like TSO can be done at the state level. Screeners worked at airports before Homeland Security was created.

Nothing like that...simply the fed gov creating a dept to staff for more control, nothing else.  

Folks gotta stop making excuses for our bloated wasteful fed gov.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stevenash said:

Dove, why isn't anyone  circumventing the wall in Israel?

A paragraph I saw somewhere:

 

But the system has proved far from hermetic. Depending on the season, up to 60,000 Palestinians without work permits 

This is the hidden content, please
 to work in construction, agriculture or service industries in Israel, either through gaps in the route or by utilizing the services of local smugglers. And occasionally, the system is defeated by Palestinians who carry out terrorist attacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, stevenash said:

“I don’t care that most of the workers not getting paid are Democrats, I want to stop the Shutdown as soon as we are in agreement on Strong Border Security!” the president tweeted. “I am in the White House ready to go, where are the Dems?” - I interpret that as meaning it doesnt matter who is the victim of the shutdown.  He did not intend for the shutdown to have a particular impact on a particular segment of society.  Apparently you interpreted it as he doesnt care about their pay if they are democrats.

I respect your interpretation. My co-workers were discussing it at work and we did not interpret it as meaning it doesn't matter who is the victim of the shut down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Law Man said:

I respect your interpretation. My co-workers were discussing it at work and we did not interpret it as meaning it doesn't matter who is the victim of the shut down. 

 " So the Dems realize that MOST of the people not getting paid are Democrats? " he added. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Nothing like that...simply the fed gov creating a dept to staff for more control, nothing else.  

Folks gotta stop making excuses for our bloated wasteful fed gov.

Homeland Security was created after 9-11. President Bush administration created this department that I appreciate.  President Trump is creating the United States Space Force. Do you consider this wasteful government?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Law Man said:

I respect your interpretation. My co-workers were discussing it at work and we did not interpret it as meaning it doesn't matter who is the victim of the shut down. 

So you are saying that the reason he wanted the shutdown is because it would do harm to federal workers who mostly voted against him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Law Man said:

Homeland Security was created after 9-11. President Bush administration created this department that I appreciate.  President Trump is creating the United States Space Force. Do you consider this wasteful government?

I don’t consider education wasteful spending, but the fed gov manages to do it in the Dept. of Education.  The fed gov is too large to effectively manage most programs, especially when it’s full of corrupt folks running them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Law Man said:

Homeland Security was created after 9-11. President Bush administration created this department that I appreciate.  President Trump is creating the United States Space Force. Do you consider this wasteful government?

35 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I don’t consider education wasteful spending, but the fed gov manages to do it in the Dept. of Education.  The fed gov is too large to effectively manage most programs, especially when it’s full of corrupt folks running them.

Imo, we do not need a space force, and NASA is a HUGE waste of money.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, stevenash said:

So you are saying that the reason he wanted the shutdown is because it would do harm to federal workers who mostly voted against him?

16 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I don’t consider education wasteful spending, but the fed gov manages to do it in the Dept. of Education.  The fed gov is too large to effectively manage most programs, especially when it’s full of corrupt folks running them.

Corrupt folks running them. 100% agree.

20 minutes ago, stevenash said:

So you are saying that the reason he wanted the shutdown is because it would do harm to federal workers who mostly voted against him?   Initially he didn't want to shut Government down. He agreed to sign a bipartisan bill.  My interpretation of his tweets are my reason for asking your opinion. 

 

16 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I don’t consider education wasteful spending, but the fed gov manages to do it in the Dept. of Education.  The fed gov is too large to effectively manage most programs, especially when it’s full of corrupt folks running them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

Imo, we do not need a space force, and NASA is a HUGE waste of money.  

I don't know. Weapons are placed on satellites.  Recently other countries have been launching into space. China is planning to launch its own artificial moon by 2020 to replace street lamps and lower cost in urban areas, state media report. This all sound fishy to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...