Jump to content

Nederland 52 Vidor 43/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, bballfan342 said:

You saw one BC game all year and it was at the two time defending state champions place? Great way to judge a team. 

Yea, I thought about this too.  But I've also seen Silsbee quite a few times.  I also know what causes Silsbee problems.  Bridge City don't posess anything that could cause Silsbee or any good teams issues.  It starts off at the guards.  You have kids that don't dribble well, that don't finish at the cup in traffic and you have shooters that's scared to shoot.  I'm not saying BC would've won,  it if BC possessed these traits, it would've been a loooot closer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bballfan342 said:

You saw one BC game all year and it was at the two time defending state champions place? Great way to judge a team. 

I have to say watching last nights game I had the same thoughts.  But I know Nederland doesn’t apply pressure the same way we do,  and that was the main thing that gave BC fits, turnovers and very few shots where there wasn’t a hand in their face. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, stevenash said:

I heard that in the Nederland-BC game, BC made an extremely high percentage of threes.

Very true.  And the whole team played well.  Nederland, other than Hefner, looked very flat that night.  There was one other player on the team, don’t know his name, who I would say played at or above average.  And let’s not forget McMorris was still playing football who is a pretty key piece for the Bulldogs.   Add some “favorable” officiating and it was a perfect storm.  

I was chastised that night for not giving BC enough credit.  And to be sure, they played very well and deserved that win.  But if anyone thinks if those two teams played 100 times and Nederland’s wins don’t start with a 9 in that hypothetical, they are fooling themselves.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Yea, I thought about this too.  But I've also seen Silsbee quite a few times.  I also know what causes Silsbee problems.  Bridge City don't posess anything that could cause Silsbee or any good teams issues.  It starts off at the guards.  You have kids that don't dribble well, that don't finish at the cup in traffic and you have shooters that's scared to shoot.  I'm not saying BC would've won,  it if BC possessed these traits, it would've been a loooot closer...

I can sum it up for you. Texas Southern won at Oregon and at Baylor, yet they can’t beat Lamar. It’s all about matchups and sometimes a team is an off night and the other team is on Fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...