Jump to content

Nederland 52 Vidor 43/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, bballfan342 said:

You saw one BC game all year and it was at the two time defending state champions place? Great way to judge a team. 

Yea, I thought about this too.  But I've also seen Silsbee quite a few times.  I also know what causes Silsbee problems.  Bridge City don't posess anything that could cause Silsbee or any good teams issues.  It starts off at the guards.  You have kids that don't dribble well, that don't finish at the cup in traffic and you have shooters that's scared to shoot.  I'm not saying BC would've won,  it if BC possessed these traits, it would've been a loooot closer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bballfan342 said:

You saw one BC game all year and it was at the two time defending state champions place? Great way to judge a team. 

I have to say watching last nights game I had the same thoughts.  But I know Nederland doesn’t apply pressure the same way we do,  and that was the main thing that gave BC fits, turnovers and very few shots where there wasn’t a hand in their face. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, stevenash said:

I heard that in the Nederland-BC game, BC made an extremely high percentage of threes.

Very true.  And the whole team played well.  Nederland, other than Hefner, looked very flat that night.  There was one other player on the team, don’t know his name, who I would say played at or above average.  And let’s not forget McMorris was still playing football who is a pretty key piece for the Bulldogs.   Add some “favorable” officiating and it was a perfect storm.  

I was chastised that night for not giving BC enough credit.  And to be sure, they played very well and deserved that win.  But if anyone thinks if those two teams played 100 times and Nederland’s wins don’t start with a 9 in that hypothetical, they are fooling themselves.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Yea, I thought about this too.  But I've also seen Silsbee quite a few times.  I also know what causes Silsbee problems.  Bridge City don't posess anything that could cause Silsbee or any good teams issues.  It starts off at the guards.  You have kids that don't dribble well, that don't finish at the cup in traffic and you have shooters that's scared to shoot.  I'm not saying BC would've won,  it if BC possessed these traits, it would've been a loooot closer...

I can sum it up for you. Texas Southern won at Oregon and at Baylor, yet they can’t beat Lamar. It’s all about matchups and sometimes a team is an off night and the other team is on Fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,883
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    paaro21
    Newest Member
    paaro21
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
    • @Big girl  @UT alum     Amazing, isn't it?!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...