Jump to content

Silsbee vs. Cuero, 4A State Semifinal


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Yes, and the 4A Divison 1 state champs only beat them by 4. In a game that many will tell you Silsbee could have won. I wasn’t there though.

If Calvin Tyler does not slip on 2 yard line, Silsbee beats Carthage in that Bi-District game. No question about it. Carthage took over on downs and won on hail mary pass.

Now that does not mean that Silsbee would have went on to play for a state title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

As far as I've seen, all of our players came out pretty healthy...  At least our main guns...

Really, a few players been playing with injuries and no contact for the past several  weeks. Didn’t finish the game with one or two of them. Thing is this is the time of year that you play with bumps and bruises, scraps and scratches. You eat the pain and play on. TigerNation!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

If Calvin Tyler does not slip on 2 yard line, Silsbee beats Carthage in that Bi-District game. No question about it. Carthage took over on downs and won on hail mary pass.

Now that does not mean that Silsbee would have went on to play for a state title.

That’s what I’ve heard from several sources. Also, if Newton doesn’t slip on the Hail Mary then the last touchdown doesn’t happen either. I’ve heard that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

If Calvin Tyler does not slip on 2 yard line, Silsbee beats Carthage in that Bi-District game. No question about it. Carthage took over on downs and won on hail mary pass.

Now that does not mean that Silsbee would have went on to play for a state title.

I believe they would have been playing for the state title.  Lil' C slipped and fell, no contact that play.  That hurt bad...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

That’s what I’ve heard from several sources. Also, if Newton doesn’t slip on the Hail Mary then the last touchdown doesn’t happen either. I’ve heard that as well.

Newton appeared to get outjumped on that play.  Newton was like 5'6" and the Carthage receiver was over 6' tall.  Teams were picking on that side the whole year with tall receivers.  It's how Bridge City got a big play late in the game over Silsbee.  Threw the jump ball to Newton's side...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we played Cuero they had some big boys on offense, and couple of tallboys. The QB liked to run to the right a lot. The way we wore them down was to run them big boys to right and then to the left, and then run right down the middle. We threw long ball on them too. I have not seen much video on the Gobblers, but it seems that they will throw. Cuero, will not be use to the hard hitting that defenses in SETEX will give them since WOS put it on them. Then put that speed on them, even some physical speed yea some physical speed. LOL. Go Tigers beat them Gobblers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ladybug33 said:

When we played Cuero they had some big boys on offense, and couple of tallboys. The QB liked to run to the right a lot. The way we wore them down was to run them big boys to right and then to the left, and then run right down the middle. We threw long ball on them too. I have not seen much video on the Gobblers, but it seems that they will throw. Cuero, will not be use to the hard hitting that defenses in SETEX will give them since WOS put it on them. Then put that speed on them, even some physical speed yea some physical speed. LOL. Go Tigers beat them Gobblers!

Lmbo!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When We played WOS our QB hadn’t played that position since jr high. We had to transition our offense when our expected QB transferred to Refugio that’s why we were 80% run which is not our usual offense. Now we are about 60-40 run but some of the runs are from the wildcat using different players. We can throw it but haven’t had to do it much since our running game has been pretty damn good but like I said we CAN throw it whenever we want. Our defense is smaller on the line but we make up for it with our speed and quickness. The linebackers are a tuff bunch and will lay the smack down on rb’s. Our cb’s are fast since we play kids both ways we keep our best athletes on the field. We have 3 kids committed to the next level with 2 committed to div1 and one to div.2 I’m sure y’all have a few too so this game should get interesting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tigers94 said:

Long sustaining drives that chew up the clock is what Silsbee needs. Keep their offense off the field. They can't beat you if they hardly have the ball. Can our line push them around enough is the question.

If what the guy said above about their d line being smaller is true, then I think yalls offensive line can have their way with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Ol Lightfoot and co. Probably gonna be licking their chops...

Lol our OL took second at state in the lineman’s challenge ... strength and agility. I really do hope y’all go in thinking you’re going to dominate at the line. Our kids show sportsmanship and will help your guys up after pancaking them lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GMGKSA said:

Lol our OL took second at state in the lineman’s challenge ... strength and agility. I really do hope y’all go in thinking you’re going to dominate at the line. Our kids show sportsmanship and will help your guys up after pancaking them lol 

Lmao!!! Sounds fun. Cuero is very good and we know. Cuero just has no clue how good Silsbee is 10-4 doesnt sound good vs 13-1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GMGKSA said:

Lol our OL took second at state in the lineman’s challenge ... strength and agility. I really do hope y’all go in thinking you’re going to dominate at the line. Our kids show sportsmanship and will help your guys up after pancaking them lol 

Gonna be fun to watch the trench warfare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GMGKSA said:

He’ll records dont matter at this point. When we played WOS in the semis we had lost 5 games. Pretty good game if I remember correctly 

Agreed.  

To add to that, its about momentum at this point.  Both teams are full of it.  We took losses from tough teams, y'all took a loss and had a close game or two early.  I expect a battle.  At this point, I just think Silsbee is a little more battle tested...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GMGKSA said:

He’ll records dont matter at this point. When we played WOS in the semis we had lost 5 games. Pretty good game if I remember correctly 

Yes it was a good game. I think Martinez was your qb? They had big guys, alot of playmakers and qb had a strong arm. They hung close with us in 1st half. But could keep up in the 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...