Jump to content

Fort Bend Marshall 47 Huntsville 43/FINAL


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, PlayActionPass said:

He needs to deep snap on punts, because the 2 safeties and the points following the free kicks are what got Huntsville back into the game and keep them in the game.

Yeah that and Huntsville started jumping those jet sweeps which really took Marshall's offense a huge step back. Question on that bated out safety on the first touch back why wasn't FB forced to kick from the 15. There was a penalty thrown for the intentional batting and you already have to kick from the 20 on a safety I thought. I could be wrong just wondering what the rule was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bronco pride said:

Yeah that and Huntsville started jumping those jet sweeps which really took Marshall's offense a huge step back. Question on that bated out safety on the first touch back why wasn't FB forced to kick from the 15. There was a penalty thrown for the intentional batting and you already have to kick from the 20 on a touchback I thought. I could be wrong just wondering what the rule was.

The illegal batting penalty does not carryover to the free kick.

The only way the illegal batting penalty would be enforced is if he would have batted the ball back into the field of play to avoid the safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PlayActionPass said:

The illegal batting penalty does not carryover to the free kick.

The only way the illegal batting penalty would be enforced is if he would have batted the ball back into the field of play to avoid the safety.

So why was a penalty thrown? Knowing that I would always just bat the ball out of the end zone. Thanks for the clarification. On the 2nd one he almost recovered it on the 1yd but luckily it kept rolling into the end one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...