Jump to content

Silsbee vs WOS - Regional Finals


STigerNation

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Magnus1on11 said:

Yes they did and how many TD's through the air? Stangs DB's should match up better than Giddings. All I saw from replays were big plays from Silsbee. But those big plays got the W. 

My prediction again is that 21 points will win this game. 21-7 Stangs

It better because we have problems scoring much more than that.When we do they seem to get called back.lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-Train11 said:

After watching y’all Friday I do agree that Silsbee will need to pass, I’ve been telling everybody that Silsbee won’t run the ball at will against y’all. 

Not sure that I agree with you that Silsbee can’t pass on y’all though. Not saying they can either, but that’s something that we all should be looking for on Friday night

 

1 hour ago, Magnus1on11 said:

Yes they did and how many TD's through the air? Stangs DB's should match up better than Giddings. All I saw from replays were big plays from Silsbee. But those big plays got the W. 

My prediction again is that 21 points will win this game. 21-7 Stangs

Y'all killing me.  Silsbee ran the ball pretty well against y'all the first meeting. To the tune of 241 rushing yards.  So those dives and stretch plays did work all that while not passing for over 50 yards.  Smh. Killin me... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Jasper threw two WIDE open tds last week. Wos will need to clean that up for sure

One off a trick play and the other off us not lining up right. We’ll have all those mistakes corrected and DARE you to throw the ball. Ross and Rose have stepped up their game in these playoffs playing almost lights out. We KNOW what Teel can do. He’s licking his chops daring you to throw his way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Magnus1on11 said:

Yes they did and how many TD's through the air? Stangs DB's should match up better than Giddings. All I saw from replays were big plays from Silsbee. But those big plays got the W. 

My prediction again is that 21 points will win this game. 21-7 Stangs

Silsbee will only score 7 WOW!

Newton, PNG & Nederland couldn't even hold Silsbee to (1) TD but ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ST413 said:

I definitely wouldn’t go by that with them missing Hunt and others.  Now you may or may not limit us to 7 but that comparison is not useful.

Go watch the game and tell me what hole hunt was going to run threw if he would of played, cause I'm not seeing it. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wosfan1992 said:

In order to beat us at this point in the year, you have to be a serious threat to pass through the air. Not just a few passes but you HAVE to be able to legitimately throw us off balance. I most definitely don’t think Silsbee can do that to us. (I may be wrong) In all honesty , I think we win by 2tds+. I just don’t see that famous dive or stretch beating us.

It got almost 300 yard rushing the first time...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

 

Y'all killing me.  Silsbee ran the ball pretty well against y'all the first meeting. To the tune of 241 rushing yards.  So those dives and stretch plays did work all that while not passing for over 50 yards.  Smh. Killin me... 

Defense is different. Those gaping holes that Jasper and Silsbee enjoyed are gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...