-
Member Statistics
45,895
Total Members1,837
Most Online
-
Posts
-
That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury. -
-
and I thought it was the concrete dividers used for construction lanes that caused the water to be dammed. I guess I missed something. -
Yeah I remember the pictures of the water piled up on the north side of the highway, it was bad. -
-
-
Topics
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.