Jump to content

Port Neches-Groves 31 Barbers Hill 14/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, BH4EVER said:

Just don’t be so surprised that the one trick pony leaves the hill just a little frustrated with the second loss of the season. The multi-talented Barbers Hill is just priming up for the upset.  But it will be a slug fest. Good luck PNG. 

Ned played without their top TWO RBs for most of the game and without the starting QB in 2nd half. It was a rough night injury wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having a bunch of starters come back after an iconic QB graduates doesn't always work out. In 2000 at Dustin Long left, I'm pretty sure PNG started the season ranked #1 -- Someone can correct me because I'm not 100% confident, but the team returned a lot of guys from the 1999 team, minus Dustin Long. Then we went 5-5. Not to say we'll do that next year. I think the future is very bright at PNG. We will definitely miss Roschon, but who wouldn't? He is a ridiculous athlete who has defined the last three years of football at PNG, and we'll be comparing players to him for the next 20 years and onward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rez Ipsa said:

Having a bunch of starters come back after an iconic QB graduates doesn't always work out. In 2000 at Dustin Long left, I'm pretty sure PNG started the season ranked #1 -- Someone can correct me because I'm not 100% confident, but the team returned a lot of guys from the 1999 team, minus Dustin Long. Then we went 5-5. Not to say we'll do that next year. I think the future is very bright at PNG. We will definitely miss Roschon, but who wouldn't? He is a ridiculous athlete who has defined the last three years of football at PNG, and we'll be comparing players to him for the next 20 years and onward. 

No almost the whole 99 team was seniors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BH people really thought this was going to be a game? We played with several backups in on offense and we didn’t even have to open up the offense. This was probaly one of our easiest wins of the season. We also played several backups on defense. This was not a game. Just wish Faircloth would have used the RB’s more. There was no reason to be running RJ when the game was decided. His dad was pissed towards the end of the game because he kept running it when the game was decided. We needed to run the clock out with our RB’s . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, prepballfan said:

 

Not sure why it's copying you Prep. I look at PA News and it appears RJ has 36 carries. That's insane! BF should be ashamed of himself. After RJ and Ceja, the ndn offense had 22 total yards. BF better figure out how to distribute the ball better. Not sure why he didn't have the RB's run the ball more. RJ had all but 6 yards of total rushing. That's on BF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TradenupBH said:

Not sure why it's copying you Prep. I look at PA News and it appears RJ has 36 carries. That's insane! BF should be ashamed of himself. After RJ and Ceja, the ndn offense had 22 total yards. BF better figure out how to distribute the ball better. Not sure why he didn't have the RB's run the ball more. RJ had all but 6 yards of total rushing. That's on BF.

Y’all kill me with this “Why does Faircloth run him so much?” stuff. 

Look, I get it. Nobody, including myself, wants that kid to get hurt. He has a very bright future. But if you don’t think Herman is gonna run that kid when gets to UT, y’all are insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, The Icon said:

Y’all kill me with this “Why does Faircloth run him so much?” stuff. 

Look, I get it. Nobody, including myself, wants that kid to get hurt. He has a very bright future. But if you don’t think Herman is gonna run that kid when gets to UT, y’all are insane.

My favorite comment at MCM last year, referring to how much we rely on Johnson:

”He better get used to it now if he wants to play at Texas.”

Dude wasn’t lying,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, The Icon said:

Y’all kill me with this “Why does Faircloth run him so much?” stuff. 

Look, I get it. Nobody, including myself, wants that kid to get hurt. He has a very bright future. But if you don’t think Herman is gonna run that kid when gets to UT, y’all are insane.

I thought he was slated to line up at receiver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Icon said:

Y’all kill me with this “Why does Faircloth run him so much?” stuff. 

Look, I get it. Nobody, including myself, wants that kid to get hurt. He has a very bright future. But if you don’t think Herman is gonna run that kid when gets to UT, y’all are insane.

You're killing me, I looked at Texas QB this year and Herman runs his QB 7-10 times on average per game. The highest was 17 carries in one game. I don't know where or what y'all know about football, but running your QB 36 times in a game and that's all of the time is crazy. I remember Bama kid being a band guy, I guess maybe you were too? Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...