Jump to content

Crosby@Nederland


navydawg31

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, KF89 said:

There was no weakness with Stansbury or Riggs with Nederland secondary. Every pass stansbury caught was under 8 yds in the 1st half becuz he was tackled immediately after short receptions & Ned db’s stepped up & shut down big plays by all png wr’s all nite & intercepted png 2 times  13-24 99yds equals about 7yds a catch compared to about 9 yds a carry by Mr. Johnson even the dumbest coach knows to let Mr. Johnson run becuz the wr’s were not getting it done.  Mr. Stansbury was given what Ned db’s wanted to give them then tightened up coverage on him on 3rd downs which amounts to not much of an advantage .Come on man give credit when credit is due to Ned secondary,Faircloth & his offensive coaches went away from the pass becuz Ned db’s shut it down & Knew Mr. Johnsons running ability was png  best option to win 

I wholeheartedly disagree. This is Cams Stat line that game.

Cameron Stansbury 7-67

There are more to stats than just reading the QB stat line. While he overall passing average was 7 yards, to CAM it was nearly 10.

That means Cam had nearly 10 yards a catch every time HE touched the ball. Ned made an effort to take away Riggs and Hughes which they did very well because Roschon only had 6 other completions in the game. At nearly 10 yards a catch from Stansbury, as you now know, that is nearly a first down every catch. You DONT go away from that. As I said before, you don't go away from what works. If they stay with the pass and Cam has a game as productive in the 3rd and 4th as he did in the first and second, PNG has more first downs, meaning less running on Johnson, and that may open Riggs later. Just if he doubles his catches and yards its a 14 catch 134 yard game. You DO give your DT QB chances to make plays in the passing game so he CAN close with the RUN.

Not trying to take away from Ned, but BF gives you guys games with his decisions. Now if PNG can make a stand on D, none of all what I said matters anyway. Just an observation. Now go beat Crosby!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neds D has been solid all year, United, Santa Fe, Dayton and Vidor all had goose eggs on the board at the half, and WOS only points were from their defense, so that's pretty good....but that D will be put to the test the next 2 weeks, I would think Crosby and PNG have the 2 best offenses  in the District.....I think Nederland takes it this week, but Crosby won't make it easy at all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Jack Da Rabbit said:

I wholeheartedly disagree. This is Cams Stat line that game.

Cameron Stansbury 7-67

There are more to stats than just reading the QB stat line. While he overall passing average was 7 yards, to CAM it was nearly 10.

That means Cam had nearly 10 yards a catch every time HE touched the ball. Ned made an effort to take away Riggs and Hughes which they did very well because Roschon only had 6 other completions in the game. At nearly 10 yards a catch from Stansbury, as you now know, that is nearly a first down every catch. You DONT go away from that. As I said before, you don't go away from what works. If they stay with the pass and Cam has a game as productive in the 3rd and 4th as he did in the first and second, PNG has more first downs, meaning less running on Johnson, and that may open Riggs later. Just if he doubles his catches and yards its a 14 catch 134 yard game. You DO give your DT QB chances to make plays in the passing game so he CAN close with the RUN.

Not trying to take away from Ned, but BF gives you guys games with his decisions. Now if PNG can make a stand on D, none of all what I said matters anyway. Just an observation. Now go beat Crosby!

You lost the game.  Period.  And they don't play again till next week.   Crosby is up next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • There's some truth to that.......some.
    • The AD's job is to win in football. Everything else is window dressing. If the football team is winning the rest can go up in smoke. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...