Jump to content

Conservative Black Leadership Meet With Trump


Hagar

Recommended Posts

These are some inspiring messages.  You see the word “Leadership” in the title?  That’s what these young people are, Leaders.  They’re the spear point (Leaders) of a new movement, away from the Ultra Left, who only want to make them more dependent on the Govt.  They give me hope we can save our country.

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Hagar said:

These are some inspiring messages.  You see the word “Leadership” in the title?  That’s what these young people are, Leaders.  They’re the spear point (Leaders) of a new movement, away from the Ultra Left, who only want to make them more dependent on the Govt.  They give me hope we can save our country.

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

BigGirl is scratching her/his head!  LOL!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BearEssentials97 said:

That group is scorned by people who have black America interests at heart. 

And who might that be?  Oh, Trump of course.  Lowest black unemployment ever.  Many blacks moving into the middle class.  Actually living the American Dream.  Standing on their own two feet, and breaking the shackles the Democrats want blacks in.  But I don’t think Trump scorns the group.  I think he likes them.  

But if you disagree with my post.  If you think Democrats giving free iPhones to blacks is better than Republicans giving blacks an opportunity to go to work and better themselves, well, uhhhhhhhhh, that’s your right.

As for myself, I think a prosperous black society is good for America.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hagar said:

And who might that be?  Oh, Trump of course.  Lowest black unemployment ever.  Many blacks moving into the middle class.  Actually living the American Dream.  Standing on their own two feet, and breaking the shackles the Democrats want blacks in.  But I don’t think Trump scorns the group.  I think he likes them.  

But if you disagree with my post.  If you think Democrats giving free iPhones to blacks is better than Republicans giving blacks an opportunity to go to work and better themselves, well, uhhhhhhhhh, that’s your right.

As for myself, I think a prosperous black society is good for America.  

 Most of the gains in black wealth and employment were made under Obama.  The celebrity in Chief did nothing.  Why he has a 10 percent approval rating is beyond me. Maybe it's 10 percent of black republicans? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BearEssentials97 said:

 Most of the gains in black wealth and employment were made under Obama.  The celebrity in Chief did nothing.  Why he has a 10 percent approval rating is beyond me. Maybe it's 10 percent of black republicans? 

Please list the Obama policies that helped with black employment. I have asked several times what did Obama do to help blacks and have received absolutely no answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baddog said:

Please list the Obama policies that helped with black employment. I have asked several times what did Obama do to help blacks and have received absolutely no answer.

Please list the fart policies that help black people first since anything I have stated in the past is just libtard propaganda. Maybe if you enlighten me I'll propose to Candice Owens and we can raise super fart sniffers together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, BearEssentials97 said:

Please list the fart policies that help black people first since anything I have stated in the past is just libtard propaganda. Maybe if you enlighten me I'll propose to Candice Owens and we can raise super fart sniffers together.

creating an economic environment that allows everyone to have a job- creating an economic environment where there are more jobs open than people to fill them- creating an economic environment that has black and hispanic unemployment rates at historical lows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stevenash said:

creating an economic environment that allows everyone to have a job- creating an economic environment where there are more jobs open than people to fill them- creating an economic environment that has black and hispanic unemployment rates at historical lows

I asked for policies. Not anecdotal gibberish.

As for the current economy, that began under Obama. Go look at the stock market when he took office and employment numbers. You'll see this bull run started under his watch. Sadly this will end under fart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again- the broadest barometer of the health of the economy is GDP-  Bear, you can forget trying to spin that one.  Obama never had a year of 3$ growth during his entire presidency.  That is the ONLY presidency that can lay claim to that FACT.   2nd quarter GDP for 2018 was 4.2% and third quarter will come in at about 3.5% in spite of two crippling hurricanes.  The ascendance of the stock market during the previous administration can mostly attributed to a retracement of the losses of 2008 and the BENEFIT of zero% interest rates.   Trump began with neither ( although rates were still low for the first few months of his administration.  Rates never rose during the Obama years because the Federal REserve knew full well how tenuous the "recovery".  They have raised rates 4 or 5 times during the current administration because they regard the economy to be on more solid footing and pretty robust.  As Hagar just stated, when you take over at the bottom, there is no place else to go. ( There has NEVER been a recession from which we did not recover, regardless of what political party occupied the White House or ran congress.  Please let me know if you consider these remarks to also be anecdotal giberish.( note the correct spelling)  I don't know many things, but I understand this economy far better than most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, stevenash said:

Once again- the broadest barometer of the health of the economy is GDP-  Bear, you can forget trying to spin that one.  Obama never had a year of 3$ growth during his entire presidency.  That is the ONLY presidency that can lay claim to that FACT.   2nd quarter GDP for 2018 was 4.2% and third quarter will come in at about 3.5% in spite of two crippling hurricanes.  The ascendance of the stock market during the previous administration can mostly attributed to a retracement of the losses of 2008 and the BENEFIT of zero% interest rates.   Trump began with neither ( although rates were still low for the first few months of his administration.  Rates never rose during the Obama years because the Federal REserve knew full well how tenuous the "recovery".  They have raised rates 4 or 5 times during the current administration because they regard the economy to be on more solid footing and pretty robust.  As Hagar just stated, when you take over at the bottom, there is no place else to go. ( There has NEVER been a recession from which we did not recover, regardless of what political party occupied the White House or ran congress.  Please let me know if you consider these remarks to also be anecdotal giberish.( note the correct spelling)  I don't know many things, but I understand this economy far better than most.

I’m awaiting his profound, and more than likely, misspelled response.  I’m betting it has fart in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I’m awaiting his profound, and more than likely, misspelled response.  I’m betting it has fart in it.

I'll bet with you (definitely not against) that any response will at minimum contain a childish name. After all, his posts have shown his maturity level. I'm guessing now that you've called him out, he will altar the descriptive, although a rise in decorum would be too elusive and beyond his pay grade. The Liberal media he considers the word of God is making him look foolish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I'll bet with you (definitely not against) that any response will at minimum contain a childish name. After all, his posts have shown his maturity level. I'm guessing now that you've called him out, he will altar the descriptive, although a rise in decorum would be too elusive and beyond his pay grade. The Liberal media he considers the word of God is making him look foolish. 

Nash has pretty much made him look like a fool on the economy.  

As far as looking like a racist hater, all we gotta do is read his posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...