Jump to content

Superbowl Matchup Predictions


DEM BOYZ

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Omegatron said:

Mannn it ain’t about having respect bro the pa teams are better teams this year if a upset happens then that’s great but teams are going to have to almost play perfect against them justbkeeping it real 

PA-B barely beat Ned-W(who got beat by PNG-P)..... and PA-R beat PA-B by almost 30. But that's fine. We'll take the "underdog" role. ☺

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DEM BOYZ said:

PA-B barely beat Ned-W(who got beat by PNG-P)..... and PA-R beat PA-B by almost 30. But that's fine. We'll take the "underdog" role. ☺

Come on man this a brand new season now bro I base my prediction off of what I seen in season. Anything can happen, it’s going to be interesting to see how this first round plays out. Best of luck to u and your kids 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DEM BOYZ said:

We dont overlook anyone. Just saying all those 39-0 wins PA-B has against bottom teams is not a good indication of things. But we shall see......like I told PA-R, both teams will show up and the kids have to play the game.☺

To that I say "home cooking." It could have, would have AND should have been worst. Good luck and hope to see you next round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2018 at 0:03 PM, DEM BOYZ said:

We dont overlook anyone. Just saying all those 39-0 wins PA-B has against bottom teams is not a good indication of things. But we shall see......like I told PA-R, both teams will show up and the kids have to play the game.☺

And Nederland Black won against bottom of the barrel teams. When y’all played real teams such as BC AND PA RED y’all took L’s. Come on let’s be real. And the if you was present at the Nederland white and PAB game. You know exactly what happen. So let’s keep it real now man. I not once talk down on Nederland black or shot them down against no team. But now I’m gone come out and say what it is. I am part of the PAB coaching staff and the kids we have are some dogs. The two kids y’all have are legit no doubt. That’s 2 against 11. And the the first game of the season we had some babies who didn’t understand the concept. Now they balling. And you still have top tier athletes who haven’t touched the ball or had a bare minimum carry of one or two touches. #24 is one of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GodSpeed said:

And Nederland Black won against bottom of the barrel teams. When y’all played real teams such as BC AND PA RED y’all took L’s. Come on let’s be real. And the if you was present at the Nederland white and PAB game. You know exactly what happen. So let’s keep it real now man. I not once talk down on Nederland black or shot them down against no team. But now I’m gone come out and say what it is. I am part of the PAB coaching staff and the kids we have are some dogs. The two kids y’all have are legit no doubt. That’s 2 against 11. And the the first game of the season we had some babies who didn’t understand the concept. Now they balling. And you still have top tier athletes who haven’t touched the ball or had a bare minimum carry of one or two touches. #24 is one of them. 

Funniest list of excuses I've seen in a while. Pretty sure it's 11 on 11. Can 2 kids make all the tackles? As far as y'all against Ned-W...I saw a tight game between 2 teams. A struggle.

PA-R 35

PA-B 8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DEM BOYZ said:

Funniest list of excuses I've seen in a while. Pretty sure it's 11 on 11. Can 2 kids make all the tackles? As far as y'all against Ned-W...I saw a tight game between 2 teams. A struggle.

PA-R 35

PA-B 8

Lol ok. Enough said. All i need to hear! Have a bless one. We will see you next week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DEM BOYZ said:

Funniest list of excuses I've seen in a while. Pretty sure it's 11 on 11. Can 2 kids make all the tackles? As far as y'all against Ned-W...I saw a tight game between 2 teams. A struggle.

PA-R 35

PA-B 8

As i recall. Y’all lost two.. We will take that one L. 0 points gave up in division. And the only team to put numbers up is the same team that beat y’all on a onside kick. Or we can talk about the one kid that ran all over your defense from BC. Who i train. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, GodSpeed said:

As i recall. Y’all lost two.. We will take that one L. 0 points gave up in division. And the only team to put numbers up is the same team that beat y’all on a onside kick. Or we can talk about the one kid that ran all over your defense from BC. Who i train. 

Apparently it wasn't "enough said" lol. I'm sure you're responsible for any kid in SETX that has skills. Like you said in your last comment. We will see y'all next Saturday. ☺

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    adline
    Newest Member
    adline
    Joined



  • Posts

    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...