Jump to content

North Shore 63 Baytown Sterling 3/FINAL


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, JagMarine95 said:

This one's going to get ugly ugly...... if Sterling can hold them to under 70 I'd count that as a good night for them...

Coach Kay don't play those games. He could have scored 80 on GCM the past 2 years and called off the dogs.

Deer Park started taking cheap shots at his players last week so they got the full meal deal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s get real here, a good showing for Sterling could be measured by...

Defense - hold NS to multiple 3rd and long situations.   Multiple punts would be big.  

Offense - have multiple drives where we are able to put together at least 3 first downs.  A score would be big.  

Special teams - do not allow a kick or punt returned for TD.  

Play with more discipline than last week cut out the nonsense penalties.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ThirdDay said:

We can’t even get the correct number of kids on the field for special teams.  

Absolute worse set of coaches that I have ever seen in HS football.  Most undisciplined disorganized team I have seen.  Zero, I mean zero direction for these kids   

63-3, start of 4th

This is exactly my point from the LaPorte game.  I have seen many Sterling games this year and this has been a problem all year long.  The kids deserve better but it seems like all Goose Creek wants is a body for a coach.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, speedy48 said:

This is exactly my point from the LaPorte game.  I have seen many Sterling games this year and this has been a problem all year long.  The kids deserve better but it seems like all Goose Creek wants is a body for a coach.  

Time to combine all 3 Baytown schools. Get a high name coach and restore to the glory days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ThirdDay said:

None of the coaches addressed the players as a group at the end of the game.  Not the HC, not the DC, not the OC.  

“Bus leaves in 10 minutes boys, lets go.”  That is it.  A home game.  Wow, I am pissed.    

The seniors don’t deserve this and neither do the under class men.  If he don’t want to wear the shirt I would have all of his belongings packed up ready for him to pick it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,887
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    brainlarae123
    Newest Member
    brainlarae123
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
    • @Big girl  @UT alum     Amazing, isn't it?!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...