Jump to content

FYI from ol Soulja....


BMTSoulja1

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

If it's a Legit Question, then your premise is a little flawed. If you got a coach that won football games (I mean won like Newton, WOS, etc. year in/year out) then the scouts are gonna come no matter what. Plus in this day and age, even Junior High kids can make their own highlight videos. Hudl, YouTube, MaxPreps and other sites give the ability for these kids to be noticed a lot more than even just 5 years ago.

Therefore, if you had a coach that could bring a team wins, then he would effectively be getting those same kids recruited.

So, with that thought in mind, your question could only be: Would you rather choose a coach that wins football games and gets kid recruited or would you rather choose a coach that loses football games and gets kid recruited?

I'll take the winner please...

That's Arthur Louis' resume.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Austin1985 said:

Both.  In Beaumont, both can happen.  A city that produced a champion in '82 and a co-champion in 84 can have schools with deep playoff runs and significant amounts of scholarship offers

Title 1 schools are behind the 8 ball when it comes to winning big these days, especially at the 5A-6A level. Not saying it can’t be and isn’t done, but the larger school districts with kids that come from higher income families have pretty much taken over. All one needs to do is look at the past few years of state champs at the 5A-6A level 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, bigdog said:

I think coaching consistency is part of it, probably a big part of it.   Central was better about keeping a coach around for more than a couple of years but Ozen changed coaches every two years toward the end.

Consistency is a big part of it but we don't want one that is consistently losing either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Uncle Pig said:

Title 1 schools are behind the 8 ball when it comes to winning big these days, especially at the 5A-6A level. Not saying it can’t be and isn’t done, but the larger school districts with kids that come from higher income families have pretty much taken over. All one needs to do is look at the past few years of state champs at the 5A-6A level 

2017-Dallas Highland Park, College Station, Allen and Cy-Fair

2016-Dallas Highand Park, Aledo, Austin Lake Travis and DeSoto

I understand your point even though I'm not sure about the financial break down of Desoto.  I'm not expecting a state championship at United but I'm not excepting 2 wins a year either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Alpha Wolf said:

2017-Dallas Highland Park, College Station, Allen and Cy-Fair

2016-Dallas Highand Park, Aledo, Austin Lake Travis and DeSoto

I understand your point even though I'm not sure about the financial break down of Desoto.  I'm not expecting a state championship at United but I'm not excepting 2 wins a year either. 

Yessir I 100% see where you’re coming from. Desoto is very upper/middle class

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, bigdog said:

No, but you have to give a coach time to implement thier program and get the kids on board.  It usually takes more than two years.

It was the Ozen offensive system from the previous 2 years, just with more kids now but the same results.  Like I told the school board last night, those kids deserve better...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, The Icon said:

Weve seen it time and again

Would a new coach be able to bring in his own and staff and run his program? Consistency in the form of proven success is more helpful than perpetual mediocrity.

I'm sitting in Cheddars about to eat so I don't have much time but I received a 20 minute and 44 second phone call from one of the "Admin Powers" yesterday on this entire topic wanting to know my and the community's concerns about United football.  And I didn't hold back, I was actually more controlled last night because I only had 2 and half minutes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...