Jump to content

West Orange-Stark 24 Silsbee 21/FINAL

ST413

By ST413
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

j_dog

j_dog

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

BTW, when's the last time that WO-S has allowed a RB to go for over 300 yards on them.  I'm trying to see something...

I doubt that any WOS team has EVER given up those kinds of yards.  The big question is, is WOS that bad this year, or is Hunt that good.  I think Hunt is just that good.  In Jasper's first five games nobody came close to shutting him down, and WOS didn't do much better than the first five teams.  If you have not been following the Jasper-WOS thread Hunt had on his first six carries 3 TDs and over 200 yards.

Hunt didn't have three hundred plus yards in the earlier games because he sat on the bench after the half as far as I know.  Unless Silsbee has a RB like Hunt (and few teams ever do) then Tigers better be ready for a slobberknocker football game.  WOS is still a good and dangerous team even if perhaps they are not at their usual level.  Don't know about Silsbee.  Wouldn't try to pick a winner.  Good luck to both teams and may the ball bounce well for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

GUNHO
GUNHO

I would rather pay to get in and they ear mark that money to fix the score board that has not worked properly in years.A team that has been to 4 straight trips to state and won two of those should at

BADSANTA
BADSANTA

But doesnt everyone own Bridge City?

STiger85
STiger85

More then likely this will be the game that WOS puts it all together. If we take care of us I like our chances. WOS seems to always have a special place in their hearts for us. 

BMTSoulja1

BMTSoulja1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BADSANTA said:

Silsbee seems to have a stable of running backs. I've heard at least 4 backs in the backfield over the last few games. I wouldn't mind seeing Taylor return to RB and keeping Foster at QB. 

I agree.  Foster I dint believe hasn't thrown an interception. And has thrown for more TD passes than the other. And has played only a fraction of the reps as the others.  And he's more accurate than the others.  Roll with Foster the rest of the way and bring Taylor in on situational plays.  

If our Line blocks like I know they can, Silsbee wins.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dj

dj

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, BADSANTA said:

Silsbee seems to have a stable of running backs. I've heard at least 4 backs in the backfield over the last few games. I wouldn't mind seeing Taylor return to RB and keeping Foster at QB. 

No disrespect when I say this silsbee backs are just as gud as jasper backs.so if w.o doesn't put cooper back at LB I don't think w.o will slow them down either.the kid #45 that was lost for the year is huge.teams has to take advantage of the lack of experience w.o has a LB right now.by next year #48 will be better.he is just a soph.maybe by the end of the year he will be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
STiger85

STiger85

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I agree.  Foster I dint believe hasn't thrown an interception. And has thrown for more TD passes than the other. And has played only a fraction of the reps as the others.  And he's more accurate than the others.  Roll with Foster the rest of the way and bring Taylor in on situational plays.  

If our Line blocks like I know they can, Silsbee wins.  

The O line is blocking just fine. When the other teams don’t have to worry about the pass you better believe they are going to load up the box. We have a JV quarterback trying to make it in a varsity world. Throwing the ball up in the air down the field is not quarterbacking. Don’t pour the anointing oil just yet. BUT get it ready, the more he plays the more experienced he gets and he is calm in the pocket. I see him at practice and he is working hard and you can tell it’s just about to all come together for him. Our O-line is just fine, when our passing game gets going......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MMstangfan

MMstangfan

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, j_dog said:

I doubt that any WOS team has EVER given up those kinds of yards.  The big question is, is WOS that bad this year, or is Hunt that good.  I think Hunt is just that good.  In Jasper's first five games nobody came close to shutting him down, and WOS didn't do much better than the first five teams.  If you have not been following the Jasper-WOS thread Hunt had on his first six carries 3 TDs and over 200 yards.

Hunt didn't have three hundred plus yards in the earlier games because he sat on the bench after the half as far as I know.  Unless Silsbee has a RB like Hunt (and few teams ever do) then Tigers better be ready for a slobberknocker football game.  WOS is still a good and dangerous team even if perhaps they are not at their usual level.  Don't know about Silsbee.  Wouldn't try to pick a winner.  Good luck to both teams and may the ball bounce well for you.

Hunt is good , and the kid from Newton . IMO neither one would have gotten 50 yards on the 2016 Chain Gang. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, ST413 said:

What are yall considering “all time winning”? Percentage?  Percentage wise i have seen that.

 the winning percentage of a minimum of 500 games is that what your asking?. Right now the number 1 leader is  Southlake Carroll 77% Port Arthur has the 25th highest in the state with 66%

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ST413

ST413

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, LC-M said:

 the winning percentage of a minimum of 500 games is that what your asking?. Right now the number 1 leader is  Southlake Carroll 77% Port Arthur has the 25th highest in the state with 66%

Yes thats what i was asking, had seen that before.  Just when i first read it i was thinking number of wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Reagan
      Political Memes

      By Reagan · Posted

    • Reagan
      Coordinated Federal Effort To Target Trump!

      By Reagan · Posted

      Judge Aileen Cannon unsealed a trove of documents Monday that appear to reveal a coordinated effort within the JoeBama administration to target Donald Trump with political prosecution after he left office. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Woodshed
      APRIL 23rd SCORES

      By Woodshed · Posted

      Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...