Jump to content

Hardin 7 East Chambers 57/FINAL


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

Hardin vs Kirby should be a pretty good game. Hardin moved the ball well in the 1st half but you can tell the young QB had some jitters, he missed 2  deep balls that would have gone for six but over threw the WR and then on the other he under threw the WR. Hardin's rb is pretty good!!! 3 tds in the the first half that EC scored were off of a bad snap on a punt, Qb ran option but got confused and pitch the ball with no pitch man there and I can't remember the other one. I would go on a limb and say if Hardin had their starting qb this game it would have been prob 42-21 or a 42-28 score. They will give Kirby and Anahuac a very good game wouldn't surprise me one bit that they beat those 2 teams.  I don't see them beating Buna or OField

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Sportsfan1999 said:

Hardin vs Kirby should be a pretty good game. Hardin moved the ball well in the 1st half but you can tell the young QB had some jitters, he missed 2  deep balls that would have gone for six but over threw the WR and then on the other he under threw the WR. Hardin's rb is pretty good!!! 3 tds in the the first half that EC scored were off of a bad snap on a punt, Qb ran option but got confused and pitch the ball with no pitch man there and I can't remember the other one. I would go on a limb and say if Hardin had their starting qb this game it would have been prob 42-21 or a 42-28 score. They will give Kirby and Anahuac a very good game wouldn't surprise me one bit that they beat those 2 teams.  I don't see them beating Buna or OField

I can’t remember if I posted a prediction, but I thought sorta along these lines with a healthy QB. I think I said like 48-14. Not too far off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,885
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    bongomu
    Newest Member
    bongomu
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
    • @Big girl  @UT alum     Amazing, isn't it?!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...