Jump to content

Bill O'Brien

BS Wildcats
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hook'em

Hook'em

Posted
Posted

I think he does, but I don't think he should. I get tired of hearing the same ole crap in the postgame presser after every loss without any changes made. There is too much talent on that team to start 0-2. I did get a good laugh when someone on twitter posted, "Don't @ any Texans o-lineman with criticism, lord knows they won't be able to block you." LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, Tigers2010 said:

Again, he is going nowhere. This isn't my opinion. That comes from people who report on the NFL and understand the financial side of it. He just got extended for four years, after this one. McNair ain't about to drop 100 million to replace him. He is here to stay a minimum of two more years.

Two more years of sorry football

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Tigers2010 said:

Again, he is going nowhere. This isn't my opinion. That comes from people who report on the NFL and understand the financial side of it. He just got extended for four years, after this one. McNair ain't about to drop 100 million to replace him. He is here to stay a minimum of two more years.

They laid out $70 million on Osweiler. They were able to recoup some of their dough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Nobody is trading for Bill O Brien. They also lost a 2nd round pick to get rid of him. Like I said, that's not my opinion. That is what is being stated by everybody who works in and around the league. 

I was making a point of it not always being about money. Sometimes teams throw money at people without being proven. It wouldn't be the first time a team are their hat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    henrysmith
    Newest Member
    henrysmith
    Joined


  • Posts

    • bullets13
      Liberty is Open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I don't know who the other coach was, but this guy has no head coaching experience, and minimal high school experience.  after graduating from college he spent a year each in defensive coaching positions on bad college teams before moving to high school.  Not sure what he did from 2019-2022. Last year he spent was at cleveland, who was terrible.  He may be great, and I don't care one way or another, but if Liberty passed up a coach with a history of success for a virtual unknown with no previous success at the high school or college level I'd be pretty frustrated if I was a panther fan.
    • idk
      Liberty is Open

      By idk · Posted

      How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • Mr. Thornton Melon
      Liberty is Open

      By Mr. Thornton Melon · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • 5GallonBucket
      Vivek interview with Rubin

      By 5GallonBucket · Posted

      The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...