Jump to content

Giants @ Dallas *** SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL***


Cowboys Week 2  

2 members have voted

  1. 1. Who Ya Got?

    • New York Giants
      0
    • Dallas Cowboys


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, baddog said:

I think the Giants lost their RB, who is supposed to be pretty good. We can't stop RBs or running QBs, so that could be a good thing. Hopefully our offensive line won't look so offensive next outing. Zeke had no holes and Dak had no time.

I can’t find anything online about Barkley being injured?  He had a big game yesterday.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Tigers2010 said:

What an awful prime time game. I surprised the NFL doesn't try to flex another game into this slot. 

People will watch it because Dallas is playing. The haters will be out in full force hoping Dallas loses. Dallas faithful will be watching  hoping to see The QB throw farther than twenty yards down field. The ratings will be through the roof all because Dallas in on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, STiger85 said:

People will watch it because Dallas is playing. The haters will be out in full force hoping Dallas loses. Dallas faithful will be watching  hoping to see The QB throw farther than twenty yards down field. The ratings will be through the roof all because Dallas in on. 

I didn't say people won't watch. Inevitably, I will watch. That does not change the fact that arguably the two worst offenses in football will be playing the Sunday Night Game. That does not make me a "hater" or hoping Dallas loses, its just fact. Dallas is awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cowboys are 

This is the hidden content, please
 about the team’s lack of success and how the brand — the most valuable brand in the NFL — doesn’t resonate with the new generation of fans.

They should be concerned. The Cowboys might be the most popular team in the NFL, according to the 

This is the hidden content, please
, but the Green Bay Packers and Pittsburgh Steelers are the favorite teams of those under the age of 30. The Cowboys make up the big meaty middle — they’re the dominant team of those aged 30-64 — but that group doesn’t determine who is cool these days.

Ninety-four percent of respondents under the age of 30 

This is the hidden content, please
 that the Cowboys were not “America’s Team.”

PPP also found that no survey takers from ages 18-29 listed the Cowboys as their favorite team, but 41 percent of those under-30s did say the Cowboys were their least favorite team.

 

 

It'll be interesting to see how long 7-9 will be acceptable by Americans. Numbers are already showing people who didn't grow up in the 90's don't like the Cowboys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overreaction Monday. The Giants are one of the worst two teams in the league behind the Bills. This is the 9th game out of the last 12 Dak has thrown under 200 yards. A bad team, beat an awful team. 160 Passing yards... 64 coming on one play. But, that is exactly how Dallas has to play to win, rely on Dak as little as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tigers2010 said:

Overreaction Monday. The Giants are one of the worst two teams in the league behind the Bills. This is the 9th game out of the last 12 Dak has thrown under 200 yards. A bad team, beat an awful team. 160 Passing yards... 64 coming on one play. But, that is exactly how Dallas has to play to win, rely on Dak as little as possible.

Hey, somebody has to beat the bad teams. Lol

In the bold, that's why I say they need to get Zeke on track. A running game is a QB's best friend. Everything works off of it.

BTW, what pro team do you follow again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • he'll 1000% abuse this if elected and given the chance.  he's like a petulant little kid.  again, I'm voting for his policy, but he's all about revenge against slights and wrongs, both real and perceived.  
    • 3 yrs ago LCM and Vidor played in Vidor for a play in game.  Game was on a Saturday and started around 1 or 2p.
    • It would shock me beyond belief if he tried to. Now, I hope and pray he appoints people that will investigate, charge, and imprison anyone found guilty of the crimes against him...including treason. I would be all for a special task force charged solely with the task of investigating crimes against Trump. Of course the Democrats will be screaming bloody murder that Trump is weaponizing the government against them. We all know the story. From a cursory standpoint, there seems to be a plethora of evidence to lock up many Democrats for a long time. Unless this is done, I see no end to destruction of our political system...and this country.
    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...