Jump to content

SETXsports HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL RANKINGS - WEEK 3


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

This is the hidden content, please

2018 HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL RANKINGS

WEEK 3

 

6A/5A Rankings

Rank, School, Pts., Prev, Next Opponent

1.   Galena Park North Shore (2-0) (12), 120, 1, 9/13 at Spring Westfield

2.   Crosby (2-0), 101, 5, 9/21 vs. 4A/3A #3 West Orange-Stark

3.   A&M Consolidated (2-0), 97, 4, 9/21 vs. Leander Rouse

4.   Port Arthur Memorial (2-0), 84, 5, 9/15 at Beaumont United

5.   Huntsville (2-0), 67, 7, 9/14 vs. College Station

6.   Beaumont West Brook (1-1), 59, 2, 9/14 vs. Houston Lamar

7.   Nederland (2-0), 50, 8, 9/14 at 4A/3A #7 Silsbee

8.   Port Neches-Groves (1-1), 40, 3, 9/15 at Tomball

9.   New Caney (1-1), 17, 10, 9/14 at Willis

10. Vidor (1-0), 16, 9, 9/13 at Conroe Caney Creek

Others receiving votes: Deer Park 5, Lamar Consolidated 3, Sheldon C.E. King 3

 

4A/3A Rankings

1.   Newton (2-0) (12), 120, 1, 9/14 at #3 West Orange-Stark

2.   Jasper (2-0), 104, 2, 9/14 at Little Cypress-Mauriceville

3.   West Orange-Stark (1-1), 93, 3, 9/14 vs. #1 Newton

4.   Woodville (2-0), 87, 6, 9/14 vs. Hardin-Jefferson

5.   Diboll (2-0), 54, 7, 9/14 at Cleveland

6.   East Chambers (2-0), 53, 9, 9/14 vs. Hamshire-Fannett

7.   Silsbee (0-2), 32, 4, 9/14 vs. Nederland

8.   Franklin (1-1), 30, 5, 9/14 at Mart

9.   Orangefield (2-0), 28, NA, 9/14 at Shepherd

10. Liberty (2-0), 24, 8, 9/14 vs. Livingston

Others receiving votes: Shepherd 11, Center 4, Buna 4

 

2A-Private Rankings

1.   San Augustine (1-0) (12), 118, 1, 9/14 vs. Garrison

2.   Grapeland (2-0), 104, 3, 9/14 at Crockett

3.   Evadale (2-0), 92, 4, 9/14 at Galveston O'Connell

4.   Lovelady (1-1), 70, 2, 9/14 vs. Normangee

5.   Groveton (1-1), 68, 5, 9/14 at Buffalo

6.   Hull-Daisetta (2-0), 67, 7, 9/14 vs. Sabine Pass

7.   Beaumont Kelly Catholic (2-0), 57, 7, 9/14 vs. Tarkington

8.   Gilmer Union Hill (1-1), 32, 8, 9/14 vs. Avalon

9.   Oakwood (2-0), 17, NA, 9/14 at Milford

10. West Sabine (1-1), 12, 9, 9/14 at Hemphill

Others receiving votes: High Island 10, Baytown Christian 3, Shelbyville 2, West Hardin 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are my rankings for this week:

Here are my rankings:

6A-5A

1. North Shore

2. A&M Consol.

3. Crosby

4. PAM

5. Huntsville

6. West Brook

7. Nederland

8. PN-G

9. New Caney

10. Vidor

 

4A-3A

1. Newton

2. Jasper

3. Woodville

4. WO-S

5. Diboll

6. East Chambers

7. Shepherd

8. Orangefield

9. Lumberton

10. Buna

 

2A-Private

1. San Augustine

2. Grapeland

3. Evadale

4. Hull-Daisetta

5. Lovelady

6. Kelly

7. Groveton

8. Union Hill

9. Oakwood

10. High Island

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Austin1985 said:

Big Game of the Week should be Northshore vs. Westfield..... 

Remember that North Shore is not necessarily a "core" SETX team, but rather one that is followed by the site as they are in the same district as West Brook, United, and Sterling.  Thus, if we put them as the "SETXsports 6A/5A Game of the Week: we would have a game of the week that technically had no SETXsports teams.

Otherwise, it would have been a no brainer to have that be the game of the week.

I am curious, though, how the loss of Westfield's QB, as AAW just reported, will affect the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...