Jump to content

Crosby vs Bye


Cougar14.2

Recommended Posts

On ‎9‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 11:50 AM, Michele said:

Can't wait ... November 2nd 

Crosby played Nuemann's teams in the past, Barrow will have something different for you

Yeah, I heard BH fans saying the same thing when they hired Westeberg. You still have the same athletes and no Deshawn Washington though. Based on what I've heard about how Crosby feels about WOS after watching film and film I've seen of how Nederland looked against them, I would say Nederland would be doing well to stay within 20 points of this version of Crosby. 4-12 for 53 passing yards and a pick if pretty bad, as is 41 rushing attempts for 127 yards. It doesn't have anything to do with how good or bad Nederland is though, it's about them just not matching up well. You'll understand what I mean when Ned goes to BH in a few weeks. BH has looked subpar to date but watch how much of a matchup issue they are for y'all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

every week matchups are different,not knocking anyone just speaking the truth.true only had 50 yards passing an 150 yards rushing,it was his first varsity start ever against a team that has been to state the past four years,im sure he was a nervous wreck,not to mention pouring down rain and muddy grass field,,again the other teamn played in same conditions,not trying to make excuses.so explain manvel lost like 18 starters from last year I believe yall only lost three defensive starters from last year but this defense gave up 539 yards rushing last week,hey all that matters is Crosby won.just curious about your statement about this version of Crosby!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, chorizo said:

every week matchups are different,not knocking anyone just speaking the truth.true only had 50 yards passing an 150 yards rushing,it was his first varsity start ever against a team that has been to state the past four years,im sure he was a nervous wreck,not to mention pouring down rain and muddy grass field,,again the other teamn played in same conditions,not trying to make excuses.so explain manvel lost like 18 starters from last year I believe yall only lost three defensive starters from last year but this defense gave up 539 yards rushing last week,hey all that matters is Crosby won.just curious about your statement about this version of Crosby!!

wild n out no GIF by Identity

So they beat Manvel but this "Manvel" isn't the Manvel of the past few years. No Jalen Preston etc. Gotcha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, chorizo said:

every week matchups are different,not knocking anyone just speaking the truth.true only had 50 yards passing an 150 yards rushing,it was his first varsity start ever against a team that has been to state the past four years,im sure he was a nervous wreck,not to mention pouring down rain and muddy grass field,,again the other teamn played in same conditions,not trying to make excuses.so explain manvel lost like 18 starters from last year I believe yall only lost three defensive starters from last year but this defense gave up 539 yards rushing last week,hey all that matters is Crosby won.just curious about your statement about this version of Crosby!!

Good Lawd! 539 yards rushing!! Does Manvel run the Slot-T offense! Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Realville said:

Good Lawd! 539 yards rushing!! Does Manvel run the Slot-T offense! Lol

Lol no slot T. They lost their 3 star qb with basically their entire team and head coach which is the qb  coach at Syracuse now. The kid they had at qb was no where near the caliber of Kasin Martin and their receiving core was the least athletic I have seen from them in at least the last 6 years I have seen them in the playoffs. Their running backs were both very good but kept coughing up the ball and they had some horrible penalties. Crosby did what they had to do to win for sure but this isn't the typical Manvel team I have been used to seeing. Manvel still has the talent to win a lot of games but will lose against good teams when they turn the ball over 4 times and don't cause any. Just not the team that can overcome the things they probably could of in the past. Crosby rolled their safeties up 4 yards of the ball for much of the night because they just couldn't stop the run and if a kid like Preston was getting man coverage with no help and the entire deep middle of the field wide open it would have been easy pass and catch td's the entire night. Defensively Manvel is descent but I mean New Caney held Crosby to 28 the week before so the fact the gave almost 50 doesn't really impress me. I thought Crosbys offensive line was the difference in the game and really deserve the game ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chorizo said:

every week matchups are different,not knocking anyone just speaking the truth.true only had 50 yards passing an 150 yards rushing,it was his first varsity start ever against a team that has been to state the past four years,im sure he was a nervous wreck,not to mention pouring down rain and muddy grass field,,again the other teamn played in same conditions,not trying to make excuses.so explain manvel lost like 18 starters from last year I believe yall only lost three defensive starters from last year but this defense gave up 539 yards rushing last week,hey all that matters is Crosby won.just curious about your statement about this version of Crosby!!

Manvel is still manvel trust me when I say they are loaded, turnovers were the difference in this game and the threat of having to play a spread team with a true qb, safeties played deep most of the night, just look at the championship game from last year their defense got exposed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, bronco pride said:

Lol no slot T. They lost their 3 star qb with basically their entire team and head coach which is the qb  coach at Syracuse now. The kid they had at qb was no where near the caliber of Kasin Martin and their receiving core was the least athletic I have seen from them in at least the last 6 years I have seen them in the playoffs. Their running backs were both very good but kept coughing up the ball and they had some horrible penalties. Crosby did what they had to do to win for sure but this isn't the typical Manvel team I have been used to seeing. Manvel still has the talent to win a lot of games but will lose against good teams when they turn the ball over 4 times and don't cause any. Just not the team that can overcome the things they probably could of in the past. Crosby rolled their safeties up 4 yards of the ball for much of the night because they just couldn't stop the run and if a kid like Preston was getting man coverage with no help and the entire deep middle of the field wide open it would have been easy pass and catch td's the entire night. Defensively Manvel is descent but I mean New Caney held Crosby to 28 the week before so the fact the gave almost 50 doesn't really impress me. I thought Crosbys offensive line was the difference in the game and really deserve the game ball.

Manvel will be in the regional final mark my word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CCbigfan said:

Manvel will be in the regional final mark my word. 

Could be but will have to get much better qb play and cut out the turnovers and penalties. They are very beatable this year unlike last years team. Still a huge boost for Crosby and a big win. Just have seen a lot of Manvel games over the last several years and this is a totally different caliber team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, #COUGAR08 said:

Alltho BYE has been undefeated for the last 100 years, I'll take Crosby by 3, in a triple overtime field goal off the safety's hands and just through the uprights.

I'm just ready to come check out that Crosby WOS game. Should be another good one. I will give Crosby one thing the atmosphere is excellent and great turnout. Really cool seeing that game ball being parachuted in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Yeah, I heard BH fans saying the same thing when they hired Westeberg. You still have the same athletes and no Deshawn Washington though. Based on what I've heard about how Crosby feels about WOS after watching film and film I've seen of how Nederland looked against them, I would say Nederland would be doing well to stay within 20 points of this version of Crosby. 4-12 for 53 passing yards and a pick if pretty bad, as is 41 rushing attempts for 127 yards. It doesn't have anything to do with how good or bad Nederland is though, it's about them just not matching up well. You'll understand what I mean when Ned goes to BH in a few weeks. BH has looked subpar to date but watch how much of a matchup issue they are for y'all.

Yep, that was the stats with our back up QB in a flood of a rain storm, but ... we still have the play the game and I will say I am really looking forward to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...