Jump to content

Bridge City at Hamshire-Fannett Scrimmage/Post comments here!

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

urban_meyer

urban_meyer

Posted
Posted

BC's Defense looked a lot better last night, flying to the football!!  BC won the scrimmage 4-1 but it was really 5-1.  The QB sneak at the 1 was a TD as the QB was laying over the Goaline but the ref didn't call it a TD.  It was hard to see probably since oh btw, the lights weren't working on the Home side.  HF is pretty damn good imo as they have a QB that can go!  Once he broke contain on the D, he was a wiggle worm.  But the D held it's own.  HF's defense couldn't stop our bruising FB and whatever reverses the offense was doing.  They had 8 to 9 men in the box and were bringing the house every down.  Alll in all, the offense still needs some work but will get there.  Go Big Red!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BelichikYoSelf

BelichikYoSelf

Posted
Posted

5-1?  Incorrect my friend

You must counting the 2nd team 12 play session at end of scrimmage FROM the 20 Going IN.  H-F scored twice in that controlled section.  BC scored 3 times in that controlled section. 

 

In live half with 1s on 1s BC scored after an H-F fumble.  1-0 in live half.  H-F drove the ball all half very well with a few fumbles to kill drives.  That can be cleaned up.  The big back ran hard but was stopped twice on an outstanding goaline stand.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites
urban_meyer

urban_meyer

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, BelichikYoSelf said:

5-1?  Incorrect my friend

You must counting the 2nd team 12 play session at end of scrimmage FROM the 20 Going IN.  H-F scored twice in that controlled section.  BC scored 3 times in that controlled section. 

 

In live half with 1s on 1s BC scored after an H-F fumble.  1-0 in live half.  H-F drove the ball all half very well with a few fumbles to kill drives.  That can be cleaned up.  The big back ran hard but was stopped twice on an outstanding goaline stand.     

Hah, ya'll acted like ya'll had won the super bowl on that gif pass play.  But we all know that was NOT a so called goaline stand...that qb was in by all means.  BC scored at will on ya'lls defense!! Most the time, ya'lls backers didn't even know where the ball was on those end around , reverses BC runs.  I don't know what those plays are called but I didn't even know who had the ball until the back was in the end zone !!! lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites
urban_meyer

urban_meyer

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LC-M said:

Come on man, be honest about your team. Do you think they will make the playoffs

I'm serious...we looked terrible on both sides of the ball just saying.  No, I don't think we will make the playoffs.  It's gonna be like everyone says on their predictions!!

1. LUmberton

2. LCM

3. HUffman

4. Splendora

for pride BC and LIvingston will duke it out

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-Train11

L-Train11

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, GoBigRed2018 said:

I'm serious...we looked terrible on both sides of the ball just saying.  No, I don't think we will make the playoffs.  It's gonna be like everyone says on their predictions!!

1. LUmberton

2. LCM

3. HUffman

4. Splendora

for pride BC and LIvingston will duke it out

I wouldn’t take too much from scrimmages. Give it at least two weeks of real games then we’ll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-Train11

L-Train11

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LC-M said:

What happened yesterday with OF?

From what I’m told the “score” is worse than it actually was. We did have a pick six against us and we threw another int.

we had 230 yards of offense and 12 first downs. They had 92 yards of offense and 4 first downs.... those numbers are from the live half we played. Not sure about the controlled part. They had one big pass across the middle that went for 50 yards, which made up a huge chunk of their total yardage. 

I know everybody is reading “Lumberton lost to OF” and are freaking out, I’m not too worried about it. Scrimmages are good for film, but a bad look for fans. Next week will give all of us better insight into our teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PdaddyBball

PdaddyBball

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, L-Train11 said:

From what I’m told the “score” is worse than it actually was. We did have a pick six against us and we threw another int.

we had 230 yards of offense and 12 first downs. They had 92 yards of offense and 4 first downs.... those numbers are from the live half we played. Not sure about the controlled part. They had one big pass across the middle that went for 50 yards, which made up a huge chunk of their total yardage. 

I know everybody is reading “Lumberton lost to OF” and are freaking out, I’m not too worried about it. Scrimmages are good for film, but a bad look for fans. Next week will give all of us better insight into our teams.

At the end of a Friday night, it’s who scored more points. Not had more yards though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

On a normal Friday night you also do kickoffs and punts and play a full game and game plan and watch film and play your starters the whole game..... you get my point, it’s a little different 

That's very true and I agree with you. Im just not sold on Lumberton being a tier 1 team. I believe they will make the playoffs but I can see them losing at least two district games this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bobkat

Bobkat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, L-Train11 said:

From what I’m told the “score” is worse than it actually was. We did have a pick six against us and we threw another int.

we had 230 yards of offense and 12 first downs. They had 92 yards of offense and 4 first downs.... those numbers are from the live half we played. Not sure about the controlled part. They had one big pass across the middle that went for 50 yards, which made up a huge chunk of their total yardage. 

I know everybody is reading “Lumberton lost to OF” and are freaking out, I’m not too worried about it. Scrimmages are good for film, but a bad look for fans. Next week will give all of us better insight into our teams.

Stats look a little off, Lumberton did have more total yards but it wasn't that drastic. Our offense wasn't on the field much to be honest, we had a pick six and a fumble returned for a touchdown that was called back several minutes after we scored. We we're sending out our guys to kick the extra point and the player was then ruled down. But like I said in another thread oh well lol.

Lumberton moved the ball well and ate up the clock, but Orangefield also forced several punts on top of the turnovers. Bend but don't break defense has always been our style of play. Lumberton's defense is a head of it's offense at this point but we did move the ball on them. QB showed signs of being a player, very good with the read option but he struggled throwing the ball and making the right reads. He'll be a good one though.

Good Luck to the Raiders this season!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Bobkat said:

Stats look a little off, Lumberton did have more total yards but it wasn't that drastic. Our offense wasn't on the field much to be honest, we had a pick six and a fumble returned for a touchdown that was called back several minutes after we scored. We we're sending out our guys to kick the extra point and the player was then ruled down. But like I said in another thread oh well lol.

Lumberton moved the ball well and ate up the clock, but Orangefield also forced several punts on top of the turnovers. Bend but don't break defense has always been our style of play. Lumberton's defense is a head of it's offense at this point but we did move the ball on them. QB showed signs of being a player, very good with the read option but he struggled throwing the ball and making the right reads. He'll be a good one though.

Good Luck to the Raiders this season!!!

I forgot to ask I saw yall in the spread. Are yall running the Wing T and Spread together?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bobkat

Bobkat

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, LC-M said:

I forgot to ask I saw yall in the spread. Are yall running the Wing T and Spread together?

Yes sir we're running both, we actually have a kid at QB that can throw it a little. We run the Wing T well, but against better teams especially in the playoffs we tend to bog down. This should at least give us more options on offense for moving the ball. So far I like what I've seen the little we've ran it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-Train11

L-Train11

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Bobkat said:

Stats look a little off, Lumberton did have more total yards but it wasn't that drastic. Our offense wasn't on the field much to be honest, we had a pick six and a fumble returned for a touchdown that was called back several minutes after we scored. We we're sending out our guys to kick the extra point and the player was then ruled down. But like I said in another thread oh well lol.

Lumberton moved the ball well and ate up the clock, but Orangefield also forced several punts on top of the turnovers. Bend but don't break defense has always been our style of play. Lumberton's defense is a head of it's offense at this point but we did move the ball on them. QB showed signs of being a player, very good with the read option but he struggled throwing the ball and making the right reads. He'll be a good one though.

Good Luck to the Raiders this season!!!

Good luck to y’all as well. I’m glad to hear our defense is looking good, we’ll get our running game going for sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Bobkat said:

Yes sir we're running both, we actually have a kid at QB that can throw it a little. We run the Wing T well, but against better teams especially in the playoffs we tend to bog down. This should at least give us more options on offense for moving the ball. So far I like what I've seen the little we've ran it.

I agree yall have a big running back/ linebacker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Woodshed
      APRIL 23rd SCORES

      By Woodshed · Posted

      Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • pngfan316
      Nederland is open, Barrow Resigns

      By pngfan316 · Posted

      He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • outanup
      Multi-Sport Athletes

      By outanup · Posted

      There's some truth to that.......some.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...