Jump to content

District 9-5A DI


Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, The Icon said:

Who in that district is capable of beating Port Arthur?

Porter. Lessor teams have knocked off Port Arthur in the past two years. And with the new coach, I don't think they get out unscathed. I like the Titans but count me skeptical of them being undefeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BearEssentials97 said:

Porter. Lessor teams have knocked off Port Arthur in the past two years. And with the new coach, I don't think they get out unscathed. I like the Titans but count me skeptical of them being undefeated.

I can respect that

I may not agree, but I appreciate your response and rationale

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Icon said:

I can respect that

I may not agree, but I appreciate your response and rationale

That's why they play.  Besides one loss doesn't doom them to second place.  I think it's going to a more competitive district than what most people expect. 

I'm team PA. I like it when they do well. I wish them the very best and will be happy if proven wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BearEssentials97 said:

That's why they play.  Besides one loss doesn't doom them to second place.  I think it's going to a more competitive district than what most people expect. 

I'm team PA. I like it when they do well. I wish them the very best and will be happy if proven wrong.

I think PAM will do very well.  Morgan had a little grin on his face when asked about the offense.  They'll be much better than people outside of PA expect.  We know the D will be dominant, but word is the passing game will be electric and Hopkins could be dynamic in the run game.  I think Morgan had that grin for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That is yet to be determined in trial. ”Taking” in the Fifth Amendment doesn’t mean ownership, title changing hands, etc. A government can “take” your property without “taking” your properties.  That has been true.  This issue is, did Texas take the property under the Fifth Amendment and subsequent Supreme Court rulings and not the dictionary definition of “taking”. As always in the law, definitions matter. 
    • Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
    • But of course you wouldn’t understand the saying. You’re so clever. Your education precedes you. 
    • Hmmmm..... Didn't they just win a football state championship?
    • The fact that you try to bolster your assertion that Trump was a bad president by using "facts" that are not attributable to him is disinformation at it's worse. It is "lying by omission", which is just another way to say big ol' fat lie. Unemployment was going down to record lows before Covid hit. You and I and almost everyone on Earth knows this, but somehow you try to spin this stat as a knock on Trump. Same for the stock market. LYING BY OMISSION. A tactic almost as old as prostitution. The debt and spending exploding due to Trump is just an old fashioned bald face lie. You seem to follow the mantra "if you tell a lie enough times it becomes fact." You are starting to resemble Biden now. Do you have any other whoppers to share?  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...