Jump to content

California's 'foreclosure capital' to give away $500 a month to residents in experimental welfare program


LumRaiderFan

Recommended Posts

On 7/10/2018 at 7:42 AM, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

Median household income in Stockton is $8,000 below national median?  In a State where the Avg home is $440,000 & Rent is 50% higher than the nation, and $500 dollars a month is going to get folks out of poverty?  That’s $6,000 a year - being done by the same people that think McDonald employees should be making top wages?  You could scratch your head bald trying to rationalize this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Go fo rit.  Just as long as there is not any Federal money involved.  This program will eventually run dry.  Again -- go for it!

Any gov revenue stream eventually needs federal funding, especially if it's in danger of running dry.

Eventually the "wealthy Silicon Valley moguls" will quit funding it and guess who will step in?

In the words of the late great Ronald Reagan..."The closest thing to eternal life on earth is a Government Program".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Libs aren’t very bright...

 

This is the hidden content, please


Short story is they have given illegal aliens the right to vote in local elections, but now they are worried that ICE will use it to deport illegals. So they are going to spend 500K to educate people on the risks of voting.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

$37G per homeless person per year DOES NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM, yet $6G per year ( that's $500 per month for Big Girl ) will do it. You libs are really backward when it comes to money. It grows on trees for some of you, but alas, the trees are dying. Soon, you will have nothing to eat but each other.

San Francisco continues to spend big in fight against homelessness -- but is it working?

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Judge Aileen Cannon unsealed a trove of documents Monday that appear to reveal a coordinated effort within the JoeBama administration to target Donald Trump with political prosecution after he left office. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...