Jump to content

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

PhatMack19

By PhatMack19
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 307
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Tigers2010
Tigers2010

BTW, if ya'll want some real action head over to the Youth Sports hot topic. Page 3. LOL your welcome. Back to the topic.

baddog
baddog

Hey, at least I learned a new word...... Creditable

baddog
baddog

These women need to be charged with obstruction of justice, filing a false report, and after testifying, perjury. Hopefully that will stop future liars from coming forward.

Posted Images

BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, 77 said:

I remember a President not to long ago said "elections have consequences"   !!!

54 minutes ago, 77 said:

I remember a President not to long ago said "elections have consequences"   !!!

Dimtards have short memories.  I think he also said something along the lines of winning an election if things weren't going the way you liked them.  

MAGA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Reagan said:

This just shows how evil the Dimms have gotten!

This is the hidden content, please

From the article:

"The nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh will threaten the lives of millions of Americans for decades to come and will morph our Supreme Court into a political arm of the right-wing Republican Party," McAuliffe said.

 

I wonder if they'll be as "threatened" as the millions of babies aborted (as allowed by a SC ruling) over the last few decades?    ...doubtful.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted

I would love to see McAuliffe interviewed by a competent reporter/interviewer who makes him explain how he can come to the conclusion that Kavanaugh "will threaten the lives of millions of Americans". I recall a few Liberal posters on here mocking how Republicans use scare tactics. There is no equivalency when it comes to scare tactics used by Democrats. The Liberals posters that made those accusations should be well aware by now that the "both sides do it" tactic is akin to a basketball team winning 126-7, but try to say "well both teams scored". There is no excuse for not being awake now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I would love to see McAuliffe interviewed by a competent reporter/interviewer who makes him explain how he can come to the conclusion that Kavanaugh "will threaten the lives of millions of Americans". I recall a few Liberal posters on here mocking how Republicans use scare tactics. There is no equivalency when it comes to scare tactics used by Democrats. The Liberals posters that made those accusations should be well aware by now that the "both sides do it" tactic is akin to a basketball team winning 126-7, but try to say "well both teams scored". There is no excuse for not being awake now. 

Correct, scare tactic usage not even close.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
On 7/10/2018 at 10:25 PM, PhatMack19 said:

Kavanaugh is white

 

This is the hidden content, please

This Twitter link is about BK being white and a man.  Wondering why not a black man or woman.  The only black man currently on the COURT was a Repub choice, and he had to deal with an all out chdaracter assassination by the Dems.  No doubt if Trump had nominated Amy Barrett, who was already being attacked on the short list for being Catholic, the Dems would have fabricated lies about her as they did Thomas, or attack her relentlessly in the Media as they did Sarah Palin. 

The only conclusion one can draw from democratic actions, they love blacks and women........, if they’re liberal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
PhatMack19

PhatMack19

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 hours ago, Hagar said:

The insane Dim screamers at the hearing was an embarrassment.  I guess those sleezeballs would be happier if the hearings were held behind closed doors.

They are already getting arresting today and the hearing started 2 minutes ago.  It’s embarrassing.  Supposedly the only way to get in these hearing is to be invited.  These people are paid by the libs to disrupt and nothing else  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    henrysmith
    Newest Member
    henrysmith
    Joined


  • Posts

    • bullets13
      Liberty is Open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I don't know who the other coach was, but this guy has no head coaching experience, and minimal high school experience.  after graduating from college he spent a year each in defensive coaching positions on bad college teams before moving to high school.  Not sure what he did from 2019-2022. Last year he spent was at cleveland, who was terrible.  He may be great, and I don't care one way or another, but if Liberty passed up a coach with a history of success for a virtual unknown with no previous success at the high school or college level I'd be pretty frustrated if I was a panther fan.
    • idk
      Liberty is Open

      By idk · Posted

      How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • Mr. Thornton Melon
      Liberty is Open

      By Mr. Thornton Melon · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • 5GallonBucket
      Vivek interview with Rubin

      By 5GallonBucket · Posted

      The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...