Jump to content

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

On 9/17/2018 at 7:29 AM, baddog said:

If someone sexually assaults my wife, she isn't going to wait until you are nominated for the scotus to bring charges. Oh the timing of it all.

And she never claimed a sexual assault. She was offended by the way he grabbed her and she got away from him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Ford’s lawyer saying, we’ll meet anywhere, anytime, a few days ago, she now claims they want an FBI investigation before testifying.  My question, to anyone, what in the cornbread hail is the FBI going to investigate?  An accusation about something that happened at a party with a bunch of HS kids that happened 35 years ago.  And the accuser doesn’t know where, when, and can only give two other names- and both of them deny it happened.

This is like Englebert has pointed out several times about false accusations.  Okay, 35 years ago, while I was in a drunken stupor, Diane Feinstein sexually assaulted me (could I get that drunk?).  That’s it.  She needs to removed herself from Congress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Whatever happened to the statute of limitations?

Ain’t that the dying truth.  I think, on cases like this, it varies from state to state.  I hope Texas shortens them here.  The sad thing, all these women (and men) crying wolf for financial gain, or political reasons, will make it more difficult for the ones actually attacked or abused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2018 at 9:36 PM, Hagar said:

Grassley just announced that Monday’s date will not move.

And they’ve moved it again.  Wonder how it feels to be a human puppet, controlled by the Democrats.  If Kavanaugh is not confirmed, I think we’ll see that blue wave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hagar said:

And they’ve moved it again.  Wonder how it feels to be a human puppet, controlled by the Democrats.  If Kavanaugh is not confirmed, I think we’ll see that blue wave.

If this "B" does not testify, then it was a total fabrication, to which she, and everyone involved in the smear campaign, should go to jail...... Do not pass GO, do not collect $200.

Grassley sets Friday deadline for Kavanaugh accuser to say if she will testify

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing that proves this lady is pulling another Democratic scam, is that when ask to come testify she said no, not until the FBI investigates this.  B. Kavanaugh immediately accepted the invitation.  This is not what the FBI does.  This is a matter for local law enforcement officials.  If this happened yesterday -- the FBI would NOT be called!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, all politics aside, I have a question.  How can Anyone investigate this?  I’m asking for honest opinions.  If CF doesn’t even know what year it happened, where it happened, or who was there, how do you investigate?  I’m guessing these kids had quite a few parties over a two year period.  And since Fords’ memory is bad, what about all the other potential witnesses?  Who are you going to believe?

One thing for sure, there needs to be a short statue of limitations set on cases like this.  Accusations of this type, real or imagined, from 35 years ago, are ridiculous, imo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stevenash said:

The left cares not about the investigation.  They just want it to go until the mid terms.  Doesn't matter to them if there is any evidence to be gathered or not

There’s no doubt in my mind what you say is true.  But since the Dems want an investigation, I just want someone to tell me how they’d go about it.  Saw a guy on TV today say he’d solved cases that old, but I bet he had a base line.  This allegation doesn’t have one.

Btw, CF sudden remembrance of this incident, is similar to many who suddenly recount alien abductions.  Point is, if you believe CF, you might want to put MUFON on your favorites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard this yesterday.  That the year in question's yearbook was deleted from the internet because of what it shows about this school being a "party" school.  I also heard that her lawyers are Democratic left-wing political hacks.  It's starting to unfold what this really is!

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Concerning this situation, President Tweeted this, " “I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!” "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, stevenash said:

The left cares not about the investigation.  They just want it to go until the mid terms.  Doesn't matter to them if there is any evidence to be gathered or not

Delaying until after an election?   I wonder when was the last time that happened? You know, glass houses (on both sides)....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TxHoops said:

Delaying until after an election?   I wonder when was the last time that happened? You know, glass houses (on both sides)....

I don't seem to recall the Republicans making up lies to try and destroy a man's entire life for political purposes...they simply resorted to the "Biden Rule".

Sadly, the media is throwing stones right along with the Democrats in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...