Jump to content

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, 77 said:

I remember a President not to long ago said "elections have consequences"   !!!

54 minutes ago, 77 said:

I remember a President not to long ago said "elections have consequences"   !!!

Dimtards have short memories.  I think he also said something along the lines of winning an election if things weren't going the way you liked them.  

MAGA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Reagan said:

This just shows how evil the Dimms have gotten!

This is the hidden content, please

From the article:

"The nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh will threaten the lives of millions of Americans for decades to come and will morph our Supreme Court into a political arm of the right-wing Republican Party," McAuliffe said.

 

I wonder if they'll be as "threatened" as the millions of babies aborted (as allowed by a SC ruling) over the last few decades?    ...doubtful.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to see McAuliffe interviewed by a competent reporter/interviewer who makes him explain how he can come to the conclusion that Kavanaugh "will threaten the lives of millions of Americans". I recall a few Liberal posters on here mocking how Republicans use scare tactics. There is no equivalency when it comes to scare tactics used by Democrats. The Liberals posters that made those accusations should be well aware by now that the "both sides do it" tactic is akin to a basketball team winning 126-7, but try to say "well both teams scored". There is no excuse for not being awake now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I would love to see McAuliffe interviewed by a competent reporter/interviewer who makes him explain how he can come to the conclusion that Kavanaugh "will threaten the lives of millions of Americans". I recall a few Liberal posters on here mocking how Republicans use scare tactics. There is no equivalency when it comes to scare tactics used by Democrats. The Liberals posters that made those accusations should be well aware by now that the "both sides do it" tactic is akin to a basketball team winning 126-7, but try to say "well both teams scored". There is no excuse for not being awake now. 

Correct, scare tactic usage not even close.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2018 at 10:25 PM, PhatMack19 said:

Kavanaugh is white

 

This is the hidden content, please

This Twitter link is about BK being white and a man.  Wondering why not a black man or woman.  The only black man currently on the COURT was a Repub choice, and he had to deal with an all out chdaracter assassination by the Dems.  No doubt if Trump had nominated Amy Barrett, who was already being attacked on the short list for being Catholic, the Dems would have fabricated lies about her as they did Thomas, or attack her relentlessly in the Media as they did Sarah Palin. 

The only conclusion one can draw from democratic actions, they love blacks and women........, if they’re liberal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
9 hours ago, Hagar said:

The insane Dim screamers at the hearing was an embarrassment.  I guess those sleezeballs would be happier if the hearings were held behind closed doors.

They are already getting arresting today and the hearing started 2 minutes ago.  It’s embarrassing.  Supposedly the only way to get in these hearing is to be invited.  These people are paid by the libs to disrupt and nothing else  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,924
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...