Jump to content

You Here Illegally?! No Citizenship!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Reagan said:

I heard the other day that President Trump is thinking about telling anyone that comes into America illegally will NEVER gain citizenship.  Talk about stopping illegal crossings in a heart beat.  We won't even need a wall!  I say -- do it! 

I say this needs to be done, I just question how well it will work. Is citizenship what they are after? I think getting on the teat is what it is all about, or killing real Americans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baddog said:

I say this needs to be done, I just question how well it will work. Is citizenship what they are after? I think getting on the teat is what it is all about, or killing real Americans.

That teat is tempting, and they know the Dimtards want to keep them on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BS Wildcats said:

That teat is tempting, and they know the Dimtards want to keep them on it.

Some come here seeking political asylum. According to the libs, shouldn't the refugees go elsewhere for the same reason? Can't have it both ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I highly doubt this proposed bill makes it to the floor. Neither McConnell nor Ryan wants to expose the Republicans who would vote against it. Hopefully the bill does make it to a vote so we can see who needs to be ousted from Congress.

I agree, it will never make it.

Great idea, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heard on the radio today, that the Boston, Mass. city council is throwing around the idea of allowing non citizens to vote in city elections.  If you are here legally, but not a citizen you will be allowed to vote.  The residents should be marching against this, but this is in the northeast where there is a severe outbreak of the disease known as liberalism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2018 at 0:15 PM, baddog said:

Some come here seeking political asylum. According to the libs, shouldn't the refugees go elsewhere for the same reason? Can't have it both ways.

IF they are truly coming here for political asylum, why not go to one of the 9 american consulates in Mexico rather than making the dangerous trip to the border?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, stevenash said:

IF they are truly coming here for political asylum, why not go to one of the 9 american consulates in Mexico rather than making the dangerous trip to the border?

Exactly what I was alluding to..... since they are supposedly treated so badly here, according to the dems, shouldn't they seek political asylum FROM this country?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question: currently, as the laws stand now, can charges of aiding and abetting be brought against someone harboring illegal aliens?

If Diane Black's bill proposal becomes law, and illegal presence in the U.S. becomes a felony, can charges of aiding and abetting be brought then?

I have no idea on either question. Does someone out there know precisely the current law and potential law on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...