Jump to content

US and North Korea meet.


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

45 could... on himself and u sycophants would agree with it.

Again, please give your rationale for making this asinine statement. I bet you won't...because when you start typing the response you will realize how pathetic your statement really was. Do you really enjoy trying to pigeonhole (stereotype) everyone? I thought you people (Liberals...clarification for Dove since I know his head was about to explode) hated stereotyping people. I can't remember who originally made this statement so I can't give them credit, but I'll use it anyway. When a Liberal starts screaming about some bad action, you can bet he is the one guilty of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

He came away with more verifiable nuclear concessions that's for sure.

 

13 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Do you mean the ones where we must give several weeks advance notice before we go and "verify"?

And the one that clears the path for Iran to eventually possess nuclear weapons?

I hope you realize there are other (and much better) sources of information besides the loony Left wing-nut outlets. I'm fairly confident that you don't frequent any other sources due to your incessant parroting of those propaganda machines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Other than the deal that may or may not be real. Is denuclearization even possible with the way technology is going.

I cant answer that question.  Can you answer this one?  Did North Korea release 3 U.S. Hostages BEFORE the summit?  Did Venezuela release one?  If you finally acknowledge these TRUTHFUL statements, please dont resort to trying to give credit to the Trump predecessor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, stevenash said:

Do you mean the ones where we must give several weeks advance notice before we go and "verify"?

Okay, I'm beginning to think there is a conspiracy to keep me quiet on this forum. Laptop and cell phone having problems trying to text on here. I'm trying to comment and it keeps bring me back to Nash's post above. Anyway, I'm just posting here to try and get out from Nash'r control on this forum. Obviously he had paid off for more control. Trump Jr. Hmmm?   Help us if it's really Nash telling Trump what to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Okay, I'm beginning to think there is a conspiracy to keep me quiet on this forum. Laptop and cell phone having problems trying to text on here. I'm trying to comment and it keeps bring me back to Nash's post above. Anyway, I'm just posting here to try and get out from Nash'r control on this forum. Obviously he had paid off for more control. Trump Jr. Hmmm?   Help us if it's really Nash telling Trump what to do.

Nash has not made any payment for any control and no attempt has been made to silence you.  However, if such asinine assertions continue, I can easily make that happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First sitting American President to visit the Western Wall.  First since the Korean War to meet with the leader of N. Korea.  Snubbed his nose at the G-7.  Increase tariffs on are allies(?).  Ask for more support from our allies(?) for NATO.  Those countries have been living off the American teat so long, provided by the American taxpayers.  Why should we have so many troops in Europe costing us billions of dollars, when the Europeans spend so a small amount on their military’s?  Essentially, we’re subsidizing their Socialist programs.  And IF we can bring N. Korea into the 21st century, we could remove thousands of our troops from the south, again saving billions of dollars.  Trump, like most Americans, is tired of us being Mr. Nice Guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, stevenash said:

I cant answer that question.  Can you answer this one?  Did North Korea release 3 U.S. Hostages BEFORE the summit?  Did Venezuela release one?  If you finally acknowledge these TRUTHFUL statements, please dont resort to trying to give credit to the Trump predecessor.

Your comprehension is way off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Your comprehension is way off.

How so?  Explain it to us.

The point is Trump is actually producing results from these thugs through strength.

Some of us in this country find this a welcome change from the weak boot licker that preceded him.

So I ask again, what is Nash missing? Explain it to us.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

How so?  Explain it to us.

The point is Trump is actually producing results from these thugs through strength.

Some of us in this country find this a welcome change from the weak boot licker that preceded him.

So I ask again, what is Nash missing? Explain it to us.

 

Thats one of the lefts favorite tactics- " I am smarter than you are and therefore, you cannot understand what is taking place because you are not enlightened".   Tactic ranks right up there with the racist, homophobe label.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stevenash said:

Thats one of the lefts favorite tactics- " I am smarter than you are and therefore, you cannot understand what is taking place because you are not enlightened".   Tactic ranks right up there with the racist, homophobe label.

No just read. I said nothing about anything but asked a simple do you believe denuclearization can be achieved with the way technology is moving. Nothing about trump or his predecessor. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

How so?  Explain it to us.

The point is Trump is actually producing results from these thugs through strength.

Some of us in this country find this a welcome change from the weak boot licker that preceded him.

So I ask again, what is Nash missing? Explain it to us.

 

What do any of this have to do with what I posted about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PAMFAM10 said:

What do any of this have to do with what I posted about.

You posted,

" Your comprehension is way off. "

I responded with what I perceived as Nash's comprehension on the subject and asked you to clarify why you felt he was "way off".

I'm still waiting on your opinion on why he was way off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...