Jump to content

Lumberton Band Booster Theft


Hagar

Recommended Posts

I cannot believe that clubs like this give one person authorization to make deposits and withdrawals.  You've got to have at least two people authorized & must co-sign.  This happens about every 5 years.  Dumb, dumb, dumb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2018 at 10:28 PM, REBgp said:

I cannot believe that clubs like this give one person authorization to make deposits and withdrawals.  You've got to have at least two people authorized & must co-sign.  This happens about every 5 years.  Dumb, dumb, dumb. 

Absolutely......  but if I was willing to steal $70,000, don’t you think that I could justforge the other person’s signature?

 I am not sure that any law can stop a criminal. The only thing that stops a person from a theft crime is honesty or fear of paying a penalty.  Once the crime has been committed then the law only provides a punishment and no deterrent at that point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2018 at 5:51 AM, tvc184 said:

Absolutely......  but if I was willing to steal $70,000, don’t you think that I could justforge the other person’s signature?

 I am not sure that any law can stop a criminal. The only thing that stops a person from a theft crime is honesty or fear of paying a penalty.  Once the crime has been committed then the law only provides a punishment and no deterrent at that point. 

Good point tvc.  Just seems to bother me more when it’s an organization for the kids - school boosters, Little League, etc. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, REBgp said:

Good point tvc.  Just seems to bother me more when it’s an organization for the kids - school boosters, Little League, etc. etc.

Yes, theft is terrible. Theft from children is worse. 

 But as gun owners we make the same argument. It isn’t the gun but the person. If a person is willing to commit mass murder for which there is significant chance if death at the scene or the death penalty later, what is another law or rule going to do? 

I think that two signatures is reasonable and my union does that. It might give a person a bit of pause and rethink the issue. A person who is addicted to gambling and willing to risk prison time to keep it up? I am not sure that anything will stop that except getting caught. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some organizations separate the purchaser and financial secretary/treasurer permissions. That is, the financial secretary/treasurer has access to the bank statements, receipts, etc. but is not allowed to make purchases. The purchaser can spend the money, but does not have access to the paper trail. This setup allows the purchaser to make purchases without anyone else being present, but also ensures that same person can't hide these purchases. Of course, if the parties are in cahoots, then...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Englebert said:

Some organizations separate the purchaser and financial secretary/treasurer permissions. That is, the financial secretary/treasurer has access to the bank statements, receipts, etc. but is not allowed to make purchases. The purchaser can spend the money, but does not have access to the paper trail. This setup allows the purchaser to make purchases without anyone else being present, but also ensures that same person can't hide these purchases. Of course, if the parties are in cahoots, then...

There was a time that would’ve almost been foolproof.  But now, not so much.  Insert emoji with tears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...