Jump to content

BRIAN MORGAN NAMED NEW HC AT PORT ARTHUR MEMORIAL


Djones8301

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Reagan said:

If Memorial would have dominated their district, say, like WOS does, and constantly challenging for the State Title no one would be calling him anything other than a great coach.  He's had the opportunity and talent to easily win district titles and, again, challenge for State Titles.  But...

Could it be that some of the kids didn’t buy into his system? And that’s why they weren’t as successful as they could be? That can hurt a good coach no matter how hard they try... I don’t know if that was an issue, just something i would like to hear from somebody who knows PAM football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Reagan said:

If Memorial would have dominated their district, say, like WOS does, and constantly challenging for the State Title no one would be calling him anything other than a great coach.  He's had the opportunity and talent to easily win district titles and, again, challenge for State Titles.  But...

Perhaps.....but if you look at Memorial's history, the following fact is undeniable.  No coach, even the hallowed Ronnie Thompson, ever took the Titans as far as Kenny Harrison did, despite these coaches having the same level of talent that Harrison had.

That the next head coach may take Memorial "to the next level" is a reasonable hope, but perhaps an unreasonable expectation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was my opinion that Kenny would have probably left PAM earlier if not for his son being in high school when he was. I will say, I give the school board and school district credit for sticking with him through that rough two-season stretch right at the end of them being in 6A.

Whoever gets the job next will have a ton of talent and a heck of a fan base lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2018 at 3:47 AM, WOSgrad said:

Perhaps.....but if you look at Memorial's history, the following fact is undeniable.  No coach, even the hallowed Ronnie Thompson, ever took the Titans as far as Kenny Harrison did, despite these coaches having the same level of talent that Harrison had.

That the next head coach may take Memorial "to the next level" is a reasonable hope, but perhaps an unreasonable expectation.

First post here so go easy on me. Didn't Ronnie Thompson lose the State title game to Odessa Permian with the double D's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PNG71 said:

First post here so go easy on me. Didn't Ronnie Thompson lose the State title game to Odessa Permian with the double D's?

That was with Port Arthur Jefferson.  As 1985 stated, Thompson's stint at Memorial was less memorable.

Believe me, I am looking forward to a new Memorial coach as much as anyone for I might have a coach there who doesn't feel he is above answering my emails and I won't have a coach's wife who snipes at me by pm when folks on the board pick on her little boy.

However, I think a lot of folks are discounting the results that he had while at Memorial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/19/2018 at 9:20 AM, PNG71 said:

First post here so go easy on me. Didn't Ronnie Thompson lose the State title game to Odessa Permian with the double D's?

RT was a shell of the man. with a shell of the staff or support the 2nd stint. RT was way ahead of the curve in 78 when he roared into PA. His offense was way ahead of the defenses at that time, and the cupboard was FULL. He had a staff, administrative support, athletes, and as a hometown boy the community too. Throw in lots of 2 and 3 yr starters and a system no one had seen. Mix in a load of  Div 1 talent and you know the rest. Folks, timing is everything....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2018 at 5:59 AM, Austin1985 said:

The major plus of having KRH as head coach, he hustle scholarships for his players.  Nuemann was the polar opposite.  So let him stay in retirement, please and thank you

Man thats an apples to oranges comparison....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Austin1985 said:

Explain

Talent wise.  Nederland has some kids every few years or so that are good enough to play in college.  And by and large,  most of them did.  PA sends people every year. So blaming or praising a coach for “getting scholarships “ is kind of silly.  Those kids and their families are doing more of the work on getting the scholarships by uploading videos and social media. But you can only do what you can with what you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bigdog said:

Talent wise.  Nederland has some kids every few years or so that are good enough to play in college.  And by and large,  most of them did.  PA sends people every year. So blaming or praising a coach for “getting scholarships “ is kind of silly.  Those kids and their families are doing more of the work on getting the scholarships by uploading videos and social media. But you can only do what you can with what you have.

 

8 minutes ago, bigdog said:

Talent wise.  Nederland has some kids every few years or so that are good enough to play in college.  And by and large,  most of them did.  PA sends people every year. So blaming or praising a coach for “getting scholarships “ is kind of silly.  Those kids and their families are doing more of the work on getting the scholarships by uploading videos and social media. But you can only do what you can with what you have.

I agree, its not the coaches job to find the kid a College to play at. If the kid plays good enough the scout will find them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LC-M said:

 

I agree, its not the coaches job to find the kid a College to play at. If the kid plays good enough the scout will find them.

I disagree... a coach with good connections to the college level can get a lot of kids looks who wouldn’t normally get a look.... 

Coaches who don’t focus on the recruitment process tend to end up with fewer recruits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I disagree... a coach with good connections to the college level can get a lot of kids looks who wouldn’t normally get a look.... 

Coaches who don’t focus on the recruitment process tend to end up with fewer recruits. 

If the talent isn’t there they won’t.  That was my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I disagree... a coach with good connections to the college level can get a lot of kids looks who wouldn’t normally get a look.... 

Coaches who don’t focus on the recruitment process tend to end up with fewer recruits. 

 

4 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I disagree... a coach with good connections to the college level can get a lot of kids looks who wouldn’t normally get a look.... 

Coaches who don’t focus on the recruitment process tend to end up with fewer recruits. 

I see your point but your big D1 players imo get recruited by bigger colleges and are scouted like Kyler Murry the kid never lost a varsity game and put up big numbers kind of hard not find him at Allen. I just don't see all the big colleges knowing all the high school coaches unless the scout comes to your school and talks to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 quick examples of what I'm talking about.  Old boy who plays for the Patriots(his name escapes me) started at Morgan St.  Ended up at UofH.  I don't know if he gets that shot under Nuemann.  Also, Sage Sei(sp) had to get film from Central and Ozen to get at look from McNeese.  All my Nederland examples come from ex players/parents.  Again, I stand on my original statement for him to stay at home in his rocking chair.  Please and thanks

 

PA send a lot of kids to small colleges and JUCOs.  Nuemann, not so much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...