Jump to content

12-5A D2 Predictions


Bigdog

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, bigdog said:

I know someone is going to post this soon , so what the heck I'll do it.  No such thing as too early right?

Playoff teams (no particular order)

Nederland

PNG

Crosby

BH

_________________________________

5. Vidor

6. Dayton

7. Santa Fe

8. Baytown Lee

Can’t disagree with that top 4 - order remains to be seen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vp93 said:

What have you seen from Lee or Dayton to show that have improved that much? 

I think Dayton returns.  A team like that can't stay down for long.  Something tells me this will be better for them.

 

And Lee had some pretty good players that I  seen those year that I believe we're underclassmen.  Also, I believe their sub-varsity teams weren't bad...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, bigdog said:

I know someone is going to post this soon , so what the heck I'll do it.  No such thing as too early right?

Playoff teams (no particular order)

Nederland

PNG

Crosby

BH

_________________________________

5. Vidor

6. Dayton

7. Santa Fe

8. Baytown Lee

For now I agree with your top four but watch out for Vidor I’m not to sure if these new teams are prepared for that kind of offense. Not many teams in the state run that offense as well as vidor does. Hard to defend if you don’t see it on a yearly bases 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

For now I agree with your top four but watch out for Vidor I’m not to sure if these new teams are prepared for that kind of offense. Not many teams in the state run that offense as well as vidor does. Hard to defend if you don’t see it on a yearly bases 

I completely agree...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, navydawg31 said:

For now I agree with your top four but watch out for Vidor I’m not to sure if these new teams are prepared for that kind of offense. Not many teams in the state run that offense as well as vidor does. Hard to defend if you don’t see it on a yearly bases 

You might be right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bigdog said:

I don’t think Dayton will improve that much this year.  I think you have Lee a little high too.

I think Lee had a first year coach last year, if I'm not mistaken.  I also believe they will be returning a LOT of experienced kids next year as I believe they were mostly young.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2018 at 11:51 AM, BMTSoulja1 said:

I think Lee had a first year coach last year, if I'm not mistaken.  I also believe they will be returning a LOT of experienced kids next year as I believe they were mostly young.  

Head Coach was Tom Finn - he’s been the head coach at Texas City and Wharton before coming to Lee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StateChamp17 said:

one word for ya. Roschon.

Gonna need a lot more than him. Time to stop being awestruck and someone else to make a name for themselves. Game plan has to allow it for the sake of balance. PNG has lost a game where he runs for 300 and 5tds. Everyone has to step up. No Riggs, no Hughes, not even a Stansbury. Who will step up at WR and on D. FC has shown he not committed to these Rbs but they need to be effective when they do have their moments. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...