Jump to content

Kirbyville is open


rykerx144

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, rykerx144 said:

Posting is up until the 28th so I doubt there will be anything new until then.  I understand as of last friday there was about 50 applied.  There is a board meeting on the 22nd.  We might can learn something more official then about the process they plan to use. 

 

 

So is Doughty still running the off-season program and doing the day-to-day work of the AD?

Is Doughty going to be the one to finalize the non-district schedule?

Always an interesting dynamic when the man leaving is making he schedule for the next two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, PlayActionPass said:

So is Doughty still running the off-season program and doing the day-to-day work of the AD?

Is Doughty going to be the one to finalize the non-district schedule?

Always an interesting dynamic when the man leaving is making he schedule for the next two years.

Yes he has agreed to stay until end of year or until obviously he gets hired somewhere.  Once the new AD has been hired the new AD will take over all AD responsibilities.  

I assume Doughty will continue with his scheduling plan until replaced.  The timing of who does what? Will depend on the timing of the hire.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rykerx144 said:

.  I assume Doughty will continue with his scheduling plan until replaced.  The timing of who does what? Will depend on the timing of the hire.  

I'm wondering if any schedule plan he puts in place will cross the Superintendent's desk for approval?

Or, it might be "tentative" waiting on the new HC/Ad's approval.

This is a tough spot for them because most schedules are finalized pretty quickly after Feb. 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, dillonpanthers said:

Hopefully he wouldn't do it, but he could put them in a bad place with non district scheduling. 

He wouldnt do that.  We just going to hope for the best.  The timing of the hire and when new AD steps foot on campus will determine most of these questions.  He might just have to work with whatever is in place.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rykerx144 said:

He wouldnt do that.  We just going to hope for the best.  The timing of the hire and when new AD steps foot on campus will determine most of these questions.  He might just have to work with whatever is in place.  

Yes, he'll just have to deal with what he'd given. Not much difference than when someone is hired in March or later 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Speedkills said:

Jowell Hancock maybe?

Yes, Hancock is the HFC/AD at Rusk. He has had a good two-year run but I'm sure he is not looking forward to the possibility of being in the same district with Center and Bullard who are both dropping down. He is also graduating a very good senior class that will be hard to replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...