Jump to content

EAst Chambers Bench


thumper72

Recommended Posts

I see here on setx that ATm Fan 06  is stating that ECs bench will see a lot of playing time in the Sabine Pass 

Game on thursday at 5:15.  Well, i can tell you that ECs bench sees a lot of playing time at all the games  they play.  Coach allows his players as much playing time as possible.  Allllllllllllllllll   his players.  All the youth has talent and play a lot,  as the record shows ,  13 and 1 , and the one was a loss in overtime by 1 point.

 

Thump   Thump   Thump.......................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, JMAY88 said:

EC team is not deep.Their deep compare to Sabine or Bob Hope who has no bench those team literally  have 6 player's and one maybe two out of the six can play.Ec has a starting 5 they all can play and maybe 2 off the bench.

They returned 6 players off of last years team, and had four players move in...but they’re not deep. 

Have you seen them play any other team, than Bob Hope? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, JMAY88 said:

Yep saw them play against  Bridge  City and I will watch them again  tonight.Look EC has a good team not taking anything away from them but when I think of deep on a High School level the second 5 should just as GOOD? Just my opinion.

Silsbee’s second five isn’t as good as their starters...And you won’t find a team as deep as Silsbee. EC has 8 who you could stick in the starting rotation and not miss a beat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my last post about this. “Deep” doesn’t mean every player scoring, a “deep” team can have only 3-4 scorers. Every EC player can play defense, all 13 players can play defense at a high level in Sutherland’s system. EC has 13 players with a pretty good amount of varsity, or higher level high school, experience. In a 3A high school that’s pretty “deep”. Are all 13 on the same level, no. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, About a week ago said:

All 13 players scored 

All 13 players scored against who?  Because that doesn't mean they're deep...maybe they played a garbage team.  Which happens all the time.

How many kids score..or even play when they're in a close game..?  The number of players that contribute in a close game determines how deep a team is.  Not how many players score against a bad team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EC played 9 against Martins Mill and Edgewood. I believe 10 in 2nd Jasper game, Chapel Hill and Celina. Played 12 against WOS ,Liberty  (one player out due to injury)  Played all 13 against BC,WOS (I know they are missing 2 key guards) Legacy, BH, Campbell. Didn't see the other games. All 10 scored against Celina and Chapel Hill. 9 scored against Edgewood. 8 against Martins Mill. I think 11 scored against BC. Not sure on the other games and didn't see a few of their games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...