Jump to content

West Orange Stark vs Pleasant Grove


tennisbc

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, PlayActionPass said:

PG is a better version of Kennedale because they throw the ball better that Kennedale does.

PG is well coached, but they do not have the staff that Coach Thompson does.

Both teams have great defenses.

WOS has the experience factor.

This very well could be the best game of all the State Championship contest. Can't wait to see this one.

I agree, I think this will be a 7 point or less game one way or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PlayActionPass said:

PG is a better version of Kennedale because they throw the ball better that Kennedale does.

PG is well coached, but they do not have the staff that Coach Thompson does.

Both teams have great defenses.

WOS has the experience factor.

This very well could be the best game of all the State Championship contest. Can't wait to see this one.

I agree 100% - This could be the best game.  If defense wins championships, it appears we'll have two good ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the arklatex area hunting right now, and I keep seeing a little local news commercial that says "if defense wins championships, then pleasant grove should win one next weekend!"  And I'm just thinking, they might, but I don't think they don't exactly understand the caliber of defense they're about to face.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, PG has given up 240 points this year, WOS 119 (with two less games).  Some might try to argue that PG has had a tougher schedule,  but madisonville, wimberly, salado, and Kennedale are all very good teams.  Going through each team's schedule, I'd say they're pretty even.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, goldenstick said:

Been a few years..Life gets busy.

 

Anyway, this Pleasant Grove fan base is sure confident they are going to be able to show WOS something new. Example: this poster talks if putting 5 touchdowns on the Mustangs

 

Wow, 13 pages and I'm just now getting to put in my 2 cents...

I think our biggest advantage is our game plan, coaching, and how coachable our Hawks are. They have the athleticism, brains, and drive to come out on top. We are healthy, smart, and motivated...be prepared for the Hawks to put on a show. 

PG 35

WOS 18

Whoever this guy is truly doesn't know football.  They sit and look at who played who.instead of matchups for these 2 teams.PG truly deserve to be in the big dance.but some of the things that they do on offense want work against w.o defense. Both teams have played against some half way descent teams.all these ppl on here with all doubting.truly don't understand never measure the heart of a champion! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh okay that is a decent argument but have they played a team that is competing for a state title in a higher classification? Have they faced a 6 foot 4 prolific passer with 3 1,000 yard wr’s that beat the almighty cuero (who was most peoples pick as state champ)! Let’s not forget we’ve already played a team that runs this same offense the same way in the post season! Madisonville threw the ball out of that offense impressively but it wasn’t enough! They think they are the most physical team left lol we wrote the book on being physical! Our db’s hit like most teams linebackers!!! Gonna be like Christmas, but instead of bells it will Be silver helmets doing the ringing!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, wosgrad-84 said:

strength of schedule per Dave Campbell.

PLEASANT GROVE OPPONENTS 75 WINS TO 74 LOSES

WEST ORANGE - STARK OPPONENTS 82 WINS TO 66 LOSES

I would say our schedule was slightly tougher.   

Dave Campbell is wrong with those numbers.

Actual records for PG opponents is 95-81

For WO-S it's 84-60.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Dave Campbell is wrong with those numbers.

Actual records for PG opponents is 95-81

For WO-S it's 84-60.

That gives PG opponents a winning percentage of .539 and WO-S opponents .583. 

If you take out the losses to PG and WO-S out of those records: the opponents records are 95-66 for PG (.590) and 84-47 (.640) for WO-S. 

Either way, the argument from the PG crowd that they have played a "tougher schedule" than WO-S fails miserably when a calculator is put to the numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

That gives PG opponents a winning percentage of .539 and WO-S opponents .583. 

If you take out the losses to PG and WO-S out of those records: the opponents records are 95-66 for PG (.590) and 84-47 (.640) for WO-S. 

Either way, the argument from the PG crowd that they have played a "tougher schedule" than WO-S fails miserably when a calculator is put to the numbers.

Completely agree.

BTW, how did DCTF come up with those very inaccurate numbers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Completely agree.

BTW, how did DCTF come up with those very inaccurate numbers?

As we discussed earlier today, I have no idea.  I tried different computations....eliminating losses to PG and WO-S, using just regular season numbers, etc.  Nothing I did reflected the numbers that DCTF came up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOSgrad said:

That gives PG opponents a winning percentage of .539 and WO-S opponents .583. 

If you take out the losses to PG and WO-S out of those records: the opponents records are 95-66 for PG (.590) and 84-47 (.640) for WO-S. 

Either way, the argument from the PG crowd that they have played a "tougher schedule" than WO-S fails miserably when a calculator is put to the numbers.

Good luck trying to use something as obvious as simple math to convince them of that.  They have slayed Goliath for 15 weeks and counting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bullets13 said:

I'm in the arklatex area hunting right now, and I keep seeing a little local news commercial that says "if defense wins championships, then pleasant grove should win one next weekend!"  And I'm just thinking, they might, but I don't think they don't exactly understand the caliber of defense they're about to face.  

K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, #1stangfan said:

Good luck trying to use something as obvious as simple math to convince them of that.  They have slayed Goliath for 15 weeks and counting.

Well, to paraphrase the old Fram oil filter commercial from the 1970's, they can learn now or learn later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,936
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I think you’re missing my point- I also believe the prosecution is a mistake, but that’s not the point.    I’m confused that Conservative Christian Right-wing Republican straight white American male family first Trump voters are ignoring the fact that Trump did, in fact, do that awful thing…. But are instead focused on the fact that he’s being accused of covering it up.    There’s obviously no decency or morality in MAGA. But they still believe themselves to be exactly that… the side of decency and morality. It would be funny if the stakes weren’t so high. 
    • Naw people are mad the good ole boy system is getting broken. Didn’t think it would be this fast for the drama to be here. Honeymoon is over. 
    • Here’s the thing. I keep dropping facts on you, and you keep on knee-jerk saying “all lies!” I’ve asked you multiple times to point out whatever I’ve said that is factually wrong…but you can’t.  You might not like the facts, and they might make your eyes sweat a little… but it doesn’t change the fact that they are as true. Heck, deep down inside you might even know that Ol’ CB is right, but you believe Trump isn’t to blame. That, sir, does not turn the truth into a lie. What you should have said was is “that may be true, but I’m giving Trump a pass because…” Not “that’s a lie” when the numbers don’t lie.    But for you and everyone that  believes Trump was good for the economy, I’ll give another of my beloved and informative analogies that might help you finally understand.    A man handles his Family’s finances.  He makes a decision that life could be better, so he’s like “this is our year!” He stops all contributions to retirement accounts (cuts taxes) then proceeds to book a trip to Disney, buys nice things for the family and maxes out all possible lines of credit…. Now they’re facing bankruptcy.  The kids (y’all) are now arguing “things were so much better when  Dad (Trump, also your Daddy) was in charge! We had nice things!” The man set us on a course for ruin with deficit spending, then it accelerated with COVID, then he was such a pig that Biden got elected, and now we’re facing another “anybody but Trump” loss in the November, guaranteeing four more years of nonsense from which we’ll probably never recover. The debt is just insurmountable. We shouldn’t be surprised, either.  Trump has always been a “borrow as much as we can and pray (errrr, hope….not pray. I’m pretty sure he doesn’t do a lot of that) that it all works out” as evidenced by his businesses which have repeatedly bankrupted. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...